|
|
|
Need a Term Paper for College?
Our very best writers will produce any essay or term paper you are looking for! We offer reasonable prices and deliver top quality papers on virtually any topic. Our service is available 24/7. Be sure that we are reliable and consistent.
Order your custom term paper for only $12.95 a page!
Case Study: Amoco Oil Co. V. Borden, Inc
Amoco Oil Co. v. Borden, Inc.
889 F.2d 664 (5th Cir. 1989)
Plantiff and Defendants:
The Plantiff is Amoco Oil Company. The defendant is Borden, Inc.
Facts:
Amoco bought 114 acres of land from Borden, Inc. in Texas City, Texas. Borden was the owner of a phosphate fertilizer plant in that same location. After the land was purchased by Amoco, they found out that 35 acres of land was covered by a pile of mildly radioactive phosphogypsum, a by product of fertilizer manufacture. Amoco, unaware of the problem then hired guards and put up fences around the radioactive material. Amoco then sued Borden, under the superfund (CERCLA) for its responsive costs.
Lower Courts:
The district courts looked at Bordens' proposal that the amount of radiation emitted by the pile was less than some natural sources. The district court then ruled that Borden was not liable for the containment costs.
Issues Appealed:
Should Amoco have to pay the costs of containment or should Borden?
Who Wins:
Amoco Oil Co. wins in Supreme Court.
Reasoning:
1) The supreme court pointed out that the plantiff's who has incurred responce costs meets the liability requirements as a matter of law.
2) The Supreme Court also pointed out the fact that Amoco's security measures and site investigation are acceptable responce costs within the meaning of (CERCLA).
3) The Supreme Court concluded that Borden was accountable for the costs that the radioactive material produced.
4) Amoco was entitled to a summary judgement on the liability issue.
5) The District Court's ruling was reversed and remanded.
Word Count: 260
|
|
|
Copyright 1999-2004 Wow Essays, All Rights
Reserved
Design by Dream Net Studio
|
|
