Our very best writers will produce any essay or term paper you are looking for! We offer reasonable prices and deliver top quality papers on virtually any topic. Our service is available 24/7. Be sure that we are reliable and consistent.
Affirmative action has been the subject of increasing debate and tension in our society.
Affirmative action has divided political parties, communities and campuses across the
nation. The basis behind affirmative action is that because of past discrimination and
oppression, such as the unequal treatment of women, and the enslavement of African
Americans, minorities and women have difficulty competing with their white male
counterparts. Tax breaks for home buyers may not be wrong but what is wrong are those
who take advantage of all kinds of breaks for themselves while denying affirmative action
for the most oppressed of society. The government runs many programs to increase
opportunities for various groups including women, racial and ethnic minority groups.
Affirmative action is necessary to ensure the recruitment and employment of women,
minorities, people with disabilities, and Vietnam veterans.
Affirmative action is a term, which refers to a variety of efforts used by employers
and educational institutions to overcome past and continuing discrimination in order to
allow qualified women and minorities to compete equally for jobs, education, and
promotional opportunities. When talking about affirmative action, there is a common
misconception between meeting quota and satisfying goals. A quota is a number that must
be achieved. Consequently, if a company fails to show it has made an effort toward
following this quota the company can be fined. This is every different from an affirmative
action goal. A goal is a flexible percentage, which is established by the company to achieve
a diverse workforce. The percentage is based on the availability of minorities and females
in the area. One of the goals is to make sure that many people are made aware of job
openings as possible to ensure that the applicant pool is reflective of the number of people,
who are qualified. To accomplish this, employers place advertisements in different types of
journals, including journals for women and minorities. Goals and timetables encourage the
hiring of members of women and minority groups.
Before affirmative action, companies did not post their jobs on bulletin boards.
Somebody just happened to know someone who needed a job and the job was filled. That
person was not always the best-qualified person for the job. How can a company possibly
tell if it is hiring the best people if they only consider a small portion of the population?
One cannot assume that all the white males out there are naturally qualified and all the
minorities and women are given breaks because they could not possibly be qualified.
Affirmative action involves recruitment efforts to ensure that every applicant pool includes
a diverse mix of people. Affirmative action programs in employment consist of posting and
publicizing job notices in locations that are seem by a wide range of people. These
programs do not reach out to unqualified individuals but instead are designed to increase
the number of qualified applicants for employment. If among a list of finalists for a job
there is a woman or a minority candidate, that candidate shall be chosen unless another
candidate is prove to be better qualified. Critics attack affirmative action by assuming that
it results in the hiring of less qualified minorities over more qualified whites. Affirmative
action is not about less qualified workers, but about looking for employees in various
places. Affirmative action used correctly only brings in qualified people. Nonetheless,
there are instances when certain positions are given to minorities, but there are probably at
least twice as many instances when minorities do not get jobs because they are minorities.
Affirmative action brings in great workers who might have been otherwise overlooked.
Minorities have the qualifications and are willing to work hard. All they need is the
opportunity to show it.
Affirmative action programs in contracting are often targeted for women-owned
firms, minority-owned firms, or forms that show a disadvantage. Such programs are
traditionally excluded. Affirmative action creates opportunities with contractors. The work
comes through relationships but that first opportunity to build a relationship comes from
affirmative action.
Affirmative action in education can consist of early outreach programs, recruitment
programs, efforts in admissions to diversify the student population, and specific financial
aid opportunities. Contrary to common belief, affirmative steps are not limited to
minorities. Colleges offer programs such as scholarship, tutoring, and outreach are
targeted toward minority and women students. These colleges have been able to diversify
and at the same time greatly strengthen the class academically. Graduation rates for
minority students are rapidly increasing. The only effective way to address inequality of
opportunity is by making sure that all children are provided with the same tools to
compete in our society.
Some feel that affirmative action plans increase reverse discrimination. Qualified
white males are being passed over for promotion or a job because women or members of a
minority have applied for the same job. The woman or a minority is hired not because they
are qualified but because of affirmative action. One of the biggest complaints about
affirmative action is that it is aimed at helping African Americans and that these programs
give preferential treatment to undeserving minorities because of the color of their skin.
What about athletes and legacy students who are given preferential treatment in university
admission decisions on a yearly basis due to their white ancestry? Affirmative action
cannot be reverse discrimination because it is not just for people of color. If a female is
equally qualified then as an affirmative action effort, she should be hired. This is not
preferential treatment.
Another misconception about affirmative action is that they stigmatize and call into
question the credentials of the qualified minorities. We hear a lot about so-called stigma of
affirmative action for minorities and women. We are told that affirmative action harms the
psyches of African Americans, Latinos, and women. For some reason, veterans are not
stigmatized by the GI Bill and Europeans are not stigmatized by the Marshall plan. Why is
it that only when the beneficiaries of affirmative action are women and people of color is
there a stigma? Affirmative action gives minorities the opportunities to challenge
stereotypes and stigmas.
To be fair and equitable society, it is important that those who are disadvantages
know there is equal opportunity for them to become the best they can be. This is exactly
what affirmative action is all about. Giving to the disadvantages a little help to compete
equally, recognize their potential, and give back to the community. Affirmative action
working as it should, gives women and minorities greater equality and opportunity in a
society that has so many inequalities. Our society must be persistent in our continuation to
ensure equal opportunity for all. Learning about other groups and learning to work with a
wide range of individuals is absolutely necessary for the survival of our society. Since we
do not live in a color-blind society, affirmative action may reduce racial tension by forcing
people to interact and work together. It is there to make things the way they should be:
fair. Until someone comes up with a better system, or prejudices are eliminated, we will
always need affirmative action.
Our very best writers will produce any essay or term paper you are looking for! We offer reasonable prices and deliver top quality papers on virtually any topic. Our service is available 24/7. Be sure that we are reliable and consistent.
When turning on the television, radio, or simply opening the local newspaper, one is bombarded with news of arrests, murders, homicides, serial killers, and other such tragedies. It is a rare occasion to go throughout a day in this world and not hear of these things. So what should be done about this crime rate? Not only is it committing a crime, but today, it is signing your life over to the government. This is a risk one is taking when he decides to pull a trigger or plunge a knife, but is it really up to our justice system to decide one's fate? There are many issues that address this question of capital punishment such as religion, the effect on society, restitution being denied, the possible wrongly accused, and the rights of the convicted. But how often do these concepts creep into the public's mind when it hears of our 'fair, trusty' government taking away someone's breathing rights? The Bible states Thou shalt not kill, and this being a sin should have to be amended within oneself. However, the Bible also states Don't judge others' personal convictions. It is the government's responsibility to punish people that disobey the law to keep our world in tact but is it their right to take away their lives? It is a Christian's responsibility to point out to those who sin that they do so and this country, trusting in God as it says it does, should do just that. So if the government stands strongly by this statement that's on the dollar bill, may they line up all the liars, adulterers, Buddhists, thieves, covetous and murderers at the chair. If they shall look into this one sin as so evil may they see all ten commandments so holy. The society is so confused as to what is right. More and more children are becoming murderers themselves. The reason is obvious: they see that if they kill someone they go to jail, get the death penalty, and the government, who they know as the good guy kills them for punishment. Lesson learned: the finger is pointing to its own actions. Learning morals is only as hard as people make it. Why complicate things? Some people think that restitution is granted when one is sentenced to the death penalty. However, if a loved one is murdered and his family feels justice in having the murderer done the same, is it not considered equally demented? Forgiving and forgetting are entirely out of the question, but one should consider the concept of regret and remorse. Just as one feels terrible and wishes the benevolence of their neighbor when wrongfully driving through his yard, surely a murderer may feel the same. One is only human and no one can expect any more. A mistake is a mistake, no matter whom it may harm or what destruction it may cause. There's always the chance of the innocent being in the wrong place at the wrong time. A handful of evidence from a strong lawyer could sentence someone to life in prison, and even the death penalty. One could be spending and ending his life in captivity for simply walking down the wrong street on the wrong day. Should he have to serve the time that's not rightfully his and take the needle that shouldn't prick his skin? It's a small fault in the justice system that is not easy to overcome, but that's someone's life, and not knowing the truth could be devastating. Abraham Lincoln declared, All men are created equal. This statement of truth has obviously been left out of consideration in the court room. The man that sits upon the bench in this room is no more entitled to justice than the one that sits in the defendant's seat. Everyone deserves a second chance because they are all capable of reformation. Is the reasoning not simply to teach a lesson that one punishes another? The offender should have the chance to go back into the world and prove himself honorable. May he that makes no mistakes take the rights of he that made the big one. A crime is a crime, be it desiring a brother's wife, or shooting her. Only is it the latter that the world may see and condemn. He that carries a false tongue should sleep no sounder than he that carries a poisonous heart. If solving corruption with immorality is the world's remedy for reconciliation, then why not chop off the thief's hand? An eye for an eye was the justice of the ancient. It is now a modern world based on logic and transformation. Must we commit a crime to justify another? If capital punishment was solely based on punishing the wrongdoers, there would be no one left to inject the needle or pull the lever. Everyone would be trying to fit into the chair.
Word Count: 815
Copyright 1999-2004 Wow Essays, All Rights
Reserved
Design by Dream Net Studio
