Australian tourism policy is a significant domain for exploration due to its realistic and theoretical significance. It is of sensible importance due to demand of global travels for government assistance in decisions related to the necessities of services and facilities, mutual negotiations with aviation, communications with additional segments, application of govt. possessed reserves including domestic parks for appeal, the culmination of tourist visas, and financing of specific marketing places . The official authorities have the right to procure the political firmness, safety, lawful and the monetary structure which Australian tourism demands and governments deliver necessary services and fundamental infrastructure. The domestic governments are able to communicate and establish accords with additional governments on problems including process of immigration or arrival on domestic land .
This essay attempts to analyze the Australian tourism policy literature and their influence on different economies of the world. It also procures integrative structures in development of fragmented and diverse literature which contain meager perception of individuals for its exploration and logics against strength of the researches. Moreover, the assessment of this essay reveals extensive typical segments that assist the literature over reachable, and to deliver instance of documents within each theme.
Australian Tourism Analysis
A significant argument in the studies relates to the establishment of tourism as a tool for the economic policy . The developing economies of the world focused on this tool since the 1970s . The studies conducted worldwide in the field of Australian tourism promoted development theory and planning and they focused on jobs enrichment, establishment of backward associations with economic and agricultural segments, developed careers path for fresh scholars, promoted business activities and improved life style of the poor with the help of financing fundamental services, guidance and academic . The industrialization first strategy in under developed economies gained preference in economic establishment in comparison with another social enhancement approach . The priorities within multiple development programs described the significance of ideology in confirming the policy selections; the beliefs of ideology deliver the desirable rules that establish the tone and strength of development . Therefore theories of development, plans, policies and strategies willfully or non-willfully show an emphasized idea of what development is and these priorities, which in response reveals values and ideology .
On the basis of collapse of recent tourism in growing economies and the results of the studies conducted worldwide, a substantial number of theories came up that showed dominancy or contrary at one time. The variables came up with modernization, human advancement, dependency theory, and post-development according to Azcairate (2006). A past range of the transitions from traditional models to; contemporary models, reaction-oriented in dependency theory, different Australian tourism, the involvement of society and culture safety were subject to the discovery of and community-oriented attempts were attributable to the . A same range reported in the four structures proposed by Jafari (1989) including adaptancy, advocacy, knowledge-based and cautionary that represented policy and ideological transitions . The association between destination of Australian tourism, paradigm transfers, Australian tourism platforms and tourism situation in European cultural dynamics summarized according to Weaver (2001). The positive transitions in the paradigm stability, the objective of Australian tourism policy amended from complete advertisements to the management of race and product growth . Currently, post-advancements researches established development as a worldwide dialogue resisted by domestic additional though the dialogue treated a mutual procedure backed by mediation of effective domestic players.
Key Influences on Policy Decisions
Australian tourism is a difficult area that reveals a broad array of variables that have a significant influence on policy decisions. Every variable in the context of a particular text and multiple policy proposals led to a consideration of a policy in terms of “an outcome” instead “a process”. The following variables gained support of the executives in procuring effective solutions that ultimately ends ideological perceptions and political debates. They are aborigines, aviation, biodiversity, disability and admission, local Australian tourism, occasions’ policy, health, innovation, learning and facts, nationwide parks, and local policy .
The investigation of Australian tourism is a basis of opportunity for aborigines according to Fuller, et al. (2005). The policy decisions contained issues for Australian individuals according to Altman (1989), mutual supervision of local recreation areas according to Wearing & Huyskens (2001), the native policy , and the provisions for cultural comprehension were the key elements that impacted on policy decisions. The establishment of preference for interferences influenced on Australian tourism policy decisions according to Van Der Duim & Caalders (2002). The innovation policy and networks showed a greater influence on policy decisions according to Hjalager (2010). The evaluation of events policy occurred in multiple economies by Whitford (2002). For instance, the transition of Australian tourism policy frameworks illustrated by Kerr, et al. (2001) for the Australian tourism entities. The development of policy, thus comprehended in the context of problem investigation process and supervision where numerous issues simultaneously located, developed, preferred and de-preferred . A model also launched by Whitford (2009) for the Australian tourism events, and for sport-Australian tourism policy procedure by Weed (2006). The regional recreation place charges proposed by Buckley (2003), the land disagreements, environmental policies, and attempts to overcome Australian tourism sector according to Kent (2006), whereas the secured destinations revealed by Moore & Weiler (2009). All of them had significant impact on policy decisions.
The public bodies, their perspectives are highly significant in the research of procedures, results, and influence on Australian tourism public policies. The provisions exist for the research of underlying associations between policy and performance. The results of Australian tourism demanded adequate measurement in order to assure right policy decisions. Therefore, the assessment of public decisions, programs, actions, and policies of Australian tourism are significant in order to have advanced recognition. The results of policy for numerous forms of Australian tourism assessed in which tourism played significant role in growth, the supervisions of secured domains, and the growth in groups.
Power Relations in the Policy Arena
There are multiple ideological situations that were in consideration while the formulation of policy. The features of four varied forms of political economic systems; social democracy, mercantilism, liberalism, and communism were dominant in the discussion of . The forms varied in respect of the act of the province in the country. For instance, liberalism that involved meager wellbeing state, democracy in society, little inclusion, few state possession, rules, and substantial wellbeing state; the comparative significance of the market; policy design; and the form of policies that is agreeable. In most of the economies worldwide, a single ideology may show dominancy and vary on the basis of period. The author suggested that the policy of Australian tourism in Australia improved through an ideology of neo-liberalist, and the same attempt revealed in New Zealand . In real terms, this situation promoted as impacting policy of development in state rustic groups based at Canada and in Peru and most of the economies of the world involving UK and USA.
Hard and Soft Structures
Political economic application theory of Neo-liberalism suggests that welfare of individuals are attributable to the effectiveness of business flexibilities in the domain of institutional structures backed by private property rules, sole freedom, free trade and markets . It is the procedure through which market-oriented rules grew, state interferences decreased, and a difficult range of government and private systems carry on.
A characteristic of market-oriented-neo-freedom economic planning in the period of 1980s transferred from support policies to extensive or concealed support for development sectors which aimed to reduce encouragement for declining sectors and improve support for growing industries. This strategy demanded substantial encouragement or to a last extent, the passive approval for the transference of production sector to consumption and service segments. In referring to domestic economic growth, this action plan showed restructuring of most of the domestic economies formerly relied on manufacturing sectors .
There were few characteristics of neo-liberalism including gains, race, performance, output, individualism, monetary level-headedness, and a free market culture. Neo-liberalism linked with the nature commode-frication .
Impact of Interest Groups
Business and Environmental Interest
The management of positive conversation between groups and policy-makers establishes avoidance of failure in sustainable policy implementation. The objective is achievable through group visioning seminars where multiple interest groups in the host destination showed their ambitions and panics. The manner to discourage disagreement in Australian tourism growth proposes the combination of three fundamental variables including empirical-rational, power-coercive, and normative-educative .
Non-governmental organizations (NGOs) are the interest groups that had a great impact on policy of Australian tourism. The author illustrated the elements applied to receive legality including support, media, and litigations. NGOs were the great contributors in policy growth and in most of the economies, the flexible Australian tourism state allowed a substantial number of interest groups to aspire for playing their role in public policy-making and application in the Australian tourism segment. Though, current approaches generated a sole political sound . The environment of ethics in terms of policy is considerable for a substantial number of perspectives, but subject to the exemplification of a specific form of linked entity or value. Recent interest in ethics referred to a symbolization in the research of Australian tourism growth . An extensive interest in ethics improved through the demand to apply sustainable growth rules.
The highly significant provisions in the tourism policy are environmental ethics and they required symbolization in the economy of the market. Moreover, suggested that there is a transfer to emphasize on “only sustainability” and include observations related to social justice. Dishonesty had a significant influence on social justice that comes up with ethical fulfillment. It is condemnable that the inheritance of imbalanced growth, and the established strength of domestic political and economic elites, may weaken the aspects in terms of sustainable Australian tourism .
Evaluation of lobbying campaign
Interest groups showed their associations with customer politics that reveal typical policies that aid in minimization of costs and promote gains. A locatable team gains from a policy, as the associated costs imposed on every individual of a team or a greater segment of the individuals and that policy of Australian tourism is one such domain .
The relational campaign promotes improved involvement of “stakeholders” in the operation and strategy-making of Australian tourism entities. A stakeholder attempts to delineate the “duality of managerial interest groups and the supporting nature of organization’s objective-setting and implementation of policy. An actor-based attempt is feasible to investigate, frameworks, agency, and social transition proposed by Long (2001). Further, the strategy went ahead and researchers and focused on the proposal of Long in order to probe of power, pertinent debates linked with Australian tourism growth, and policy-development. The findings focused on associations between players and frameworks, established to segregate the unassisted dualism between framework and agency applying an island in previous East Germany as their case.
A network campaign is a preferred tool of in order to investigate the growth and procurement of policies. Network campaigns to policy growth emphasize on “policy groups” comprised of individuals that coordinated within networks. The policy evolved in the current scenario was attributable to the general sketches of association that considered the variables of difficult relationship through assessing them as they transfer and show transition . Network campaigns encouraged explication of the policy difficulty domain and the diverse nature of the policy complexities. The policy network campaigns evolved as the influential management perspectives to fathom concepts of relations of policy-development . The campaigns of networks applied to probe environmental dominancy, interest groups in England, government-public associations, interest of stakeholders and the act of gaining knowledge and networking . The network campaign eliminates the gaps within organizations and constitutes interacted efforts.
Macro, MESO and Micro Environmental Factors
There are multiple factors that cover the macro, MESO and micro environmental factors in the context of Australian tourism industry which are not limited to Economic Development, Competitiveness, Local Prosperity, Employment Quality, Social Equity and Pro-poor tourism, Visitor Fulfillment, Local Control, Community Wellbeing, Cultural Richness, Physical Integrity, Biological Diversity, Resource Efficiency, Environmental Purity, Sustainability, International Politics and Goodwill etc.
Other Policy Domains
The public policy objectives show its liabilities and ideology. Objectives depict formality, informality, implied or written. The formal objectives are generally reliable with the goals established in the public constitution or in the records of party policy. On the other hand, the leading informal objectives attain specific stakeholder goals to improve authority and retention at workplace. Numerous forms of public involvement in Australian tourism as per revealed that the lively involvement is subject to the execution of intensive actions. On the contrary, passive involvement happened when public body took action that had implications for Australian tourism but it did not impact on Australian tourism. Conventionally, the participation of government in Australian tourism is heavily dependent on the extensive policy objectives including the local economic development targets and balance of payments .
The case-study strategy is an effective research tool applied in Australia tourism policy researches as proposed by Hall & Jenkins (1995). The authors preferred application of intensive details to enhance policy comprehension in a particular scenario instead approaching to generate universal instances. The similar attempt helps to emphasize the expanded political scenario in the domain of decisions development. The domain of Australian tourism policy is extensive and fragmented and the field of exploration in comparative studies. Few scholars suggested that such an approach diminishes the level of difficulty in the context of policy that resulted in undesirable comparison between economies and regions. Nevertheless, there is few similarity of policy tools applied worldwide and therefore comparison between their roles and results may present significance, for instances in growth of regions. More specifically, policy growth that does not relate to Western cultures is significant for cross-country comparison, however, there are provisions to gauge and assess policy after its implementation. The culmination of few researches revealed that pubic planning in the context of Australian tourism has meager chance of impacting market players for the purpose of gaining economic success in destination domains and few signs for the influence of public policies showed highly significance . The comparison of theoretical illustration of the policy, there is not enough literature exists for the policies of Australian tourism. However, there is few consent that the research of Australian tourism policy included difficulty, diversity, and transition. The existence of variables prefers to execute varied attempts to fathom policy-making, and the application of grounded theory growth. There are provisions for alertness for the scholars’ ideological beliefs and preferences and they direct or restrain sources of knowledge, assessment of methods and results. The policy of Australian tourism generally supported by an extensive policy agenda in additional segments instead specifically objected at tourism. The Australian tourism policy resulted in supplementary policy areas with Expo occasions policy that influenced housing and it is preferable to reduce additional interests including a wish prevailing in aficionados to view trams in other economies of the world.
The industry-oriented point of view strengthened by the innovative expansion in Australian tourism was attributable to the economic development. The economic development took the tourism sector ahead through staggering expansion worldwide and the ultimate demand for academic suggestions and theories. The studies conducted in the field of Australian tourism attempted to locate and document this scenario with the help of the generation of huge data of examples, case studies and deviation. The contemporary developments in recent years in Australian tourism industry brought unconsolidated literature oriented measures through policy led and industry supervised efforts in order to have the tendency assessment approach for the internalization of industry preferences and observations . The studies conducted in the field of Australian tourism policies procured helpful insights into the process of who, when, what and why variables and they also contributed to effective informed public decisions and policy-making.
Ahmed, Z. U. & Krohn, F. B., 1990. Reversing the United States declining competitiveness in the marketing of international tourism: a perspective on future policy. Journal of Travel Research, II(29), pp. 23-29.
Altman, J., 1989. Tourism dilemmas for aboriginal Australians. Annals of Tourism Research, IV(16), pp. 456-476.
Azcairate, M. C., 2006. Between Local and Global, Discourses and Practices: Rethinking Ecotourism Development in Celestan (Yucatan, Mexico). Journal of Ecotourism, 1(5), pp. 97-111.
Benington, J. & Geddes, M., 1992. Local economic development in the 1980s and 1990s: Retrospect and prospects. Economic Development Quarterly, IV(6), pp. 454-463.
Bianchi, R. V., 2004. Tourism restructuring and the politics of sustainability: A critical view from the european periphery (The Canary Islands). Journal of Sustainable Tourism, VI(12), pp. 495-529.
Bramwell, B., 2006. Actors, power, and discourses of growth limits. Annals of Tourism Research, IV(33), pp. 957-978.
Bramwell, B. & Lane, B., 2008. Priorities in Sustainable Tourism Research. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, I(16), pp. 1-4.
Bramwell, B. & Meyer, D., 2007. Power and tourism policy relations in transition. Annals of Tourism Research, 3(34), pp. 766-788.
Buckley, R., 2003. Pay to play in parks: An Australian policy perspective on visitor fees in public protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, I(11), pp. 56-73.
Burns, P., 1999. Paradoxes in planning: Tourism Elitism or Brutalism?. Annals of Tourism Research, II(26), pp. 329-348.
Burns, P., 2004. The 1990 Solomon Islands Tourism Plan: A Critical Discourse Analysis.. Tourism and Hospitality Planning and Development, I(1), pp. 57-78.
Choy, D. J. L., 1991. Tourism planning: The case for market failure. Tourism Management, IV(12), pp. 313-330.
Cooper, C., 2011. Contemporary Tourism Reviews. Goodfellow Publishers Limited, pp. 18-18.
de Kadt, E., 1979. Tourism - passport to development? : perspectives on the social and cultural effects of tourism in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
Desforges, L., 2000. State tourism institutions and neo-liberal development: a case study of Peru. Tourism Geographies: An International Journal of Tourism Space, Place and Environment, II(2), pp. 177-192.
Dredge, D., 2006. Policy networks and the local organisation of tourism. Tourism Management, II(27), pp. 269-280.
Duffy, R., 2008. Neoliberalising Nature: Global Networks and Ecotourism Development in Madagasgar. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, III(16), pp. 327-344.
Elliott, J., 1997. Tourism, Politics and Public Sector Management. London: Routledge.
Fayos-Sola, E., 1996. Tourism policy: a midsummer night’s dream?. Tourism Management, VI(17), pp. 405-412.
Franklin, A. & Crang, M., 2001. The Trouble with Tourism and Travel Theory? Tourist Studies. [Online] Available at: http://tou.sagepub.com/content/1/1/5.refs[Accessed 13 November 2014].
Fuller, D., Buultjens, J. & Cummings, E., 2005. Ecotourism and indigenous micro-enterprise formation in northern Australia opportunities and constraints. Tourism Management, VI(26), pp. 891-904.
Greenwood, J., 1992. Producer Interest Groups in Tourism Policy : Case Studies From Britain and the European Community. American Behavioral Scientist, II(36), pp. 36-256.
Hall, C. & Jenkins, J., 1995. Tourism and Public Policy. s.l.:Routledge.
Hall, C. M., 1994. Tourism and Politics. Chichester: Wiley: Policy, Power, and Place.
Hall, C. M., 2007. Pro-Poor Tourism: Do “Tourism Exchanges Benefit Primarily the Countries of the South”?. Current Issues in Tourism, II(10), pp. 111-118.
Harrison, D. & Schipani, S., 2007. Lao Tourism and Poverty Alleviation: Community-Based Tourism and the Private Sector. Current Issues in Tourism, III(10), pp. 194-230.
Harrison, D. & Schipani, S., 2007. Lao Tourism and Poverty Alleviation: Community-Based Tourism and the Private Sector. Current Issues in Tourism, II(10), pp. 194-230.
Harvey, D., 2006. Neoliberalism as Creative Destruction. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography, II(34), pp. 145-158.
Hjalager, A. M., 2010. A review of innovation research in tourism. Tourism Management, I(31), pp. 1-12.
Holden, A., 2003. In need of new environmental ethics for tourism?. Annals of Tourism Research, I(30), pp. 94-108.
Jafari, J., 1989. An English-language literature review. In J. Bystrzanowski (Ed.), Tourism as a factor of change: the sociocultural study. Centre for Research and Documentation in Social Sciences, pp. 17-60.
Jenkins, C. L. & Henry, B. M., 1982. Government involvement in tourism in developing countries. Annals of Tourism Research, IV(9), pp. 499-521.
Kent, M., 2006. From Reeds to Tourism: The Transformation of Territorial Conflicts in the Titicaca National Reserve. Current Issues in Tourism, I(9), pp. 86-103.
Kerr, W., Barron, G. & Wood, R. C., 2001. Politics, Policy And Regional Tourism Administration: A Case Examination Of Scottish Area Tourist Board Funding. Tourism Management, Issue 22, pp. 649-657.
Kruczala, J., 1990. Tourism planning in Poland. Annals of Tourism Research, I(17), pp. 69-78.
Lawrence, M. & Dredge, D., 2007. Tourism planning and policy processes. In D. Dredge & J. A. Jenkins (Eds.). Tourism planning and policy. Milton: John Wiley & Sons.
Lea, J., 1993. Tourism Development Ethics in the Third World. Annals of Tourism Research, Issue 20, pp. 701-715.
Long, N., 2001. Development Sociology: Actor Perspectives. London: Routledge.
Lovelock, B., 2003. A comparative study of environmental NGOs’ perspectives of the tourism industry and modes of action in the South and South-East Asia and Oceania regions. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, I(8), pp. 1-14.
Mair, H., 2006. Global restructuring and local responses: Investigating rural tourism policy in two Canadian communities. Current Issues in Tourism, I(9), pp. 1-45.
Mathews, H. G., 1975. International Tourism and Political Science Research. Annals of Tourism Research, IV(2), pp. 195-203.
Moore, S. A. & Weiler, B., 2009. Tourism - protected area partnerships: stoking the fires of innovation. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, II(17), pp. 129-132.
O’Neil, P., 2007. Essentials of Comparative Politics. 2nd ed. Norton: s.n.
Parker, S., 1999. Collaboration on tourism policy making: Environmental and commercial sustainability on Bonaire, NA. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, III(7), pp. 240-259.
Prunier, E. K., Sweeney, A. E. & Geen, A. G., 1993. Tourism and the environment: the case of Zakynthos. Tourism Management, II(14), pp. 137-141.
Romeiro, P. & Costa, C., 2010. The potential of management networks in the innovation and competitiveness of rural tourism: a case study on the <i>Valle del Jerte</i> (Spain). Current Issues in Tourism, I(13), pp. 75-91.
Sharpley, R. & Telfer, D. J., 2002. Tourism and Development : Concepts and Issues. Buffalo: Multilingual Matters.
Shone, M. C. & Ali Memon, P., 2008. Tourism, public policy and regional development: A turn from neo-liberalism to the new regionalism. Local Economy, IV(23), pp. 290-304.
Stevenson, N., Airey, D. & Miller, G., 2008. Tourism Policy Making: The Policymakers’ Perspectives. Annals of Tourism Research, III(35), pp. 732-750.
Swain, M., Brent, M. & Long, V., 1999. Annals and Tourism Evolving: Indexing 25 years of publication. Annals of Tourism Research, XXV(25), pp. 991-1014.
Van Der Duim, R. & Caalders, J., 2002. Biodiversity and tourism: Impacts and interventions. Annals of Tourism Research, III(29), pp. 743-761.
Vernon, J., Essex, S., Pinder, D. & Curry, K., 2005. Collaborative policymaking: local sustainable projects. Annals of Tourism Research, II(32), pp. 325-345.
Wearing, S. & Huyskens, M., 2001. Moving on from joint management policy regimes in Australian national parks. Current Issues in Tourism, II(4), pp. 182-209.
Weaver, D., 2001. Ecotourism. Queensland: John Wiley and Sons.
Weed, M., 2006. The Influence of Policy Makers’ Perceptions on Sport Tourism Policy Development. Tourism Review International, IV(10), pp. 227-240.
Whitford, M., 2002. Events and public policy: a literature review of public policy analysis. Journal of Sport Tourism, III(7), pp. 46-48.
Whitford, M., 2009. A framework for the development of event public policy: Facilitating regional development. Tourism Management, V(30), pp. 674-682.
Whitford, M., Bell, B. & Watkins, M., 2001. Indigenous tourism policy in Australia: 25 years of rhetoric and economic rationalism. Current Issues in Tourism, II(4), pp. 151-181.
Wray, M., 2009. Policy communities, networks and issue cycles in tourism destination systems. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, VI(17), pp. 673-690.