The essay is about hip hop music and its impact on society is very interesting in terms of its insights. The essay clearly documents the effects of hip home musing especially on the young generation from a seemingly unbiased point of view. The writer of the essay also seems to be very knowledgeable as far as hip hop music is concerned. This can be deduced from the fact that the writer can give a statement about the effects of hip hop music especially on the young listeners of this genre of music and proceed to give examples of not only songs but also rappers. In this particular essay the writer employs deductive reasoning. This is because the writer is clearly able to show the connection between hip hop and rap music and some of the vices in society and proceed to give evidence that it is the rap music that is responsible for the development and incubation of these vices. A good example of deductive reasoning is the statement that hip hop music has led to an increase in gang related violence. The writer backs up this claim by providing names of rappers who are very popular an also very vocal in terms of their gang affiliations. These rappers make the young members of society think that gangs are the in thing and as a result the number of gang related violence and crimes has increased. The writer also employs deductive reasoning in the statement that rap music leads to the degradation of women. The writer proceeds to give songs in which women are brought out as nothing more than sex elements.
The essay titled the new known nothingism is a perfect example of the writer showcasing fallacies that are present in society today. These are fallacies that are very common in among the ordinary citizenry as well as the administrative bodies and as such they tend to cloud the judgment of the American people when it comes to matters dealing with immigrants. The first fallacy that the author presents is the assumption that the United States is being overrun by immigrants. This is a fallacy because analysis of the citizenry of the United States shows that most of the people who occupy the United States are themselves immigrants. The people claiming to be losing the country to immigrants are themselves immigrant and this creates an infinite cycle of immigrants blaming other immigrants. Another fallacy presented by the writer is the assumption that immigrants take jobs from American citizens. This fallacy is common among the population because it is very easy to see the positions that the immigrants occupy. The writer however proves this a fallacy by giving evidence that immigrants infect create more jobs than the ones that they take. Immigrants are usually entrepreneurial and they lead to job creation as opposed to job deprivation. Another fallacy presented by the author is the assumption that immigrants drain the resources of the country. This is part of a common opinion that a lot of money is spent by the government taking care of immigrants at the expense of its own citizens. This is however a fallacy according to the writer because immigrants generate more in terms of tax remittance than they use in terms of service consumption. Taxes paid by immigrants are therefore sufficient to cater for their services.