It has been argued that an individual must first perceive an idea in order to materialize an object. Philosophers argue that an individual must perceive an idea before materializing the object. There is no reliable account that seems to interlink objects and ideas, as the representation list approach tends to provide .
This made philosopher Berkeley to believe that objects and ideas are bound to be the atheism and skepticism. Even though thing are perceived in this manner, common sense provides that there exist only two important elements that are engaged in perception; this is what is perceived and the perceiver. He argues that, all that is needed to be done is to get rid of the absurd, conceive philosophically the third component in the picture.
People should accept that material objects do not exist, and the objects that we see are because of the ideas that are directly perceived by our minds tend to be real. The only way to acquire common sense is through materializing religion and science against the causes of skepticism. A significant quota of locks teachings to us is greatly required in unlearning and developing the causes of experimenter materialism.
Philosophers noted that human experience is always of solid particulars. The idea of a triangle when contemplated results in an image of a determined shape appear in the mind. The image does not indicate whether it is an icosless triangle of an equilateral triangle. The image can be used as a representative of both shapes for the purpose of geometry.
Berkeley defends the self-proclaimed common sense of believing that what individuals perceive is in the manner in which we perceive it to be. He explains that human beings only perceive things that are only sensible object, assemblies of sensible qualities, which are nothing much of the ideas that are created by the minds of the people who are perceiving them. Berkeley uses the argument that was used by Locke that showed the unreliability of the secondary qualities in enforcing his view, which is more radical. A good example is that of heat.
When an individual is exposed to excessively heat, the individual will feel pain to the extent that everybody will believe that the heat is in the person feeling the pain, and not in the heat. Berkeley argues that this is applicable even when a less amount of warmth is applied to a person and it should be perceived that the warmth is inside an individual and not from the fire. Philosophers also argue that is an individual deeps one leg into a freezing water and warms the other leg, the later deeps both legs in the freezing water, the water will feel both warm and cold at the same time. This clearly indicates that heat is a perceived notion, which is just an idea that is generated by the mind.
Other philosophers have established such experiments. It is perceived that different colors are perceived according to the ambient changes in light. Change and smell are also adversely affected by individual perception, such as when an individual is perceived to have a cold. It can be argued that since the eye position determines the size and shape of an object, a person’s experience of concreteness is dependable on an individual sense of touch and the person’s idea of emotions is usually related to a person’s situation. This explains why every sensible quality is perceived as ideas.
It is the nature of every perceived idea to be perceived in Berkeley points of view. It would be wrong to believe that the reality pertaining objects depend on the core imperceptions. This creates an argument opposing the possibility of substances that are material. Philosophers argue that the whole issue of perceptions can be allowed to rest into a single question. They ask whether it is possible for objects to exist independently of the perceiver’s idea. Berkeley illustrates this by use of a tree in the middle of the forest. This idea can hardly be found in the mind of an individual until he is convinced about that tree that is in the middle of the forest.
This makes it clear that a manner in which an individual perceives things is not independent of other perceptions. This shows that they believe and the argument that aggressively states that material substances exist independently of any perception is not logic. It is only in which a perceiver perceives an idea that enables the individual to view an object or feel. No object exists on its own as they are all perceived in the mind of an individual.
This makes it clear that a manner in which an individual perceives things is not independent of other perceptions. This shows that they believe and the argument that aggressively states that material substances exist on their own independently of any perception is not logic. It is only in which a perceiver perceives an idea that enables the individual to view an object or feel. No object exists on its own, as they are all perceived in the mind of an individual.