The most distinct part of the research of Aaron Clauset and his colleagues is to explore a pattern based on mathematical symmetries, which offers a conclusion based on scientific reasoning rather than emotional traits of the element. The patterns evaluated include power law relationship — called “scale invariance”. The statistical analysis technique employed by Clauset utilizes the statistical rule unleashing the finding with the simple extrapolation for anticipation of future occurrences.
What is the goal of this particular research?
The goal of the study is to unleash the logical symmetry / pattern behind the occurrences to spot indicators of happenings for future reference. Clauset theoretical analysis is completely in contrast to the earlier conducted researches which study the reason behind terrorism occurring to hold control. While, the Clauset theory evaluates the potential of reoccurring over the mathematical investigation of early pattern
What tools from physics are being used as part of this research? How might they prove useful in explaining/predicting terrorism?
The scientific method of evaluation being used by Aaron Clauset and his colleagues includes the study of the dynamics of patterns of attacks in terms of dynamics and severity. It evaluates the outcome to measure the probability for calculating future strategy of the terrorist.
How does studying the how of terrorism versus the why of terrorism change the research?
The change of formula of evaluation entirely transforms the approach as it allows to measure the probability of future occurrences on the grounds of certain calculations. Such a study allows Clauset to present the readings of the potential pattern of threat anticipated over the components of chronological resource allocation aligned in previous terror attacks. Hence, the outcome is complete overhauling in the scope of research in reference to horizons of targeted findings.
What does Clauset’s research reveal about the differences between secular terrorism and terrorism fueled by religious extremism?
Clauset threw light over the difference between the two kinds of terrorism with an illustration of the effect and the ideas of the event of 9 / 11. The main difference of apprehension between secular terrorism and religious terrorism lies in the theology. The religious network is better organizes that allows them to operate at a fast mode. Meanwhile, the growth ratio of religious groups is also fast in comparison to secular groups as a religious group possess a fundamental affiliation of concept with concerned religions.How might Clauset’s research prove useful in combatting terrorism?
The research of Clauset presents more a rational approach for terrorism management than offered by any other theory. The research does not allow to exactly determine the time , place or location of occurrence. However, the features studied under he law of probability allow to gauge the level, mode and spectrum of the potential happenings and future that allows to secure the zones with necessary preventive measures.
The study of Clauset allows to get into the decision making platform of the terrorist through the formula based mathematical interpretations.
How might organizational dynamics play a role in explaining the development of common patterns of behavior among terrorist organizations?
The indication of patterns developed over the model presented by Clauset is primarily devised through exploration of common patterns of the global terrorist network. These are elaborated by Cluset as the organizational dynamics from a social perspective. Clauset specify that the terrorism bodies have a single component of intense motivation with a single product of terror attacks. Hence, irrespective of network, the phenomena of operation needs to be explored. Such an investigation, as stated by Clauset allows more secure prevention that the measures adopted after retrieval of information from captives of the network