Marijuana Annotated Bibliographies Samples For Students

Introduction

Marijuana legalization is one of the polarizing issues in the United States and other countries of the world. Different people have different contradicting viewpoints on the issue with some arguing that marijuana is medicinal, others arguing that the country is losing a lot of money that would have otherwise been trapped through fees imposed on the trade. On the other hand, the opponents believe that, marijuana is an outlawed substance, which should not be allowed in the United States. Nevertheless, different states have taken similarly contradicting stands on the issue and have independently allowed or disallowed marijuana based on different ...

Medical Marijuana Program. (2010). California Department of Public Health. CA.gov. Accessed 29 March 2010 from http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/MMP/Pages/Medical%20Marijuana%20Program.aspx

This site gives information on all the themes that impact the use of medical marijuana in California. The information is about regulations and statutes and how the California program works. The site also discusses the responsibilities of dispensaries, patients, cooperatives and the primary caregiver under the programs rules.

Cohen, Peter J. “Medical Marijuana 2010 It’s time to fix the regulatory vacuum.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 38.3 (2010) Fall: 654-666 Web. 21 March 2012. Accessed from EBSCOhost.com http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs& ...

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

This order is an annotated bibliography of a research that was conducted in regard to opinions on whether marijuana should be legalized or not.

Summary

This survey was conducted on the American Association of Pediatricians Survey of Fellows. Conducted on sample of 1,099 US fellows, a total of 58% were male and 42% female. The majority of the respondents (45) were 68%, 32% were 45 or less. Averagely, the mean of the ages of the respondents was 41.
Research or survey questions included legal status of the drug marijuana to the adult population, what possible effects could occur from the ...

Works Cited

“California Court Voids Electronic Vote.” New Scientist 195.1613 (2007): 25, CQ Researcher. Web 13 July 2012.

This is a report on a decision by a California superior court justice that could be very important as a precedent setting decision. The court justice called for a recount on a vote on medical marijuana. The difference between yes and no votes was only 191 votes with the most votes going against allowing medical marijuana. The court justice called for the revote to be done during the next general election because the data had already been erased from the voting machines.

This article is very short but ...