Amnesia usually originates from memory loss as a result of particular situations, mostly brain illness, injury, or psychological trauma. Memory loss is frequently the most disabling attribute of numerous disorders, weakening the ordinary day by day actions of the patients and intensely distressing the people (Madan, 2011).
Amnesia is based on the proximal cause of the injury such as psychogenic amnesia and organic amnesia. This paper discusses psychogenic amnesia, its causes and its types including the psychogenic fugue and psychogenic focal retrograde amnesia. Psychogenic amnesia was then differentiated from retrograde and organic type of amnesia.
Psychogenic amnesia is described by a dissociation or loss of a person’s past experiences and identity (Madan, 2011). Retrograde amnesia is the lack of ability to remember knowledge that had been obtained previous to the damage or illness that formed the amnesia. Organic amnesia is caused by biological occurrences such as tumors, brain disorders and chronic practices of some drugs.
Various people think that memory disorders affect memory all together. On the other hand, this is not true since memory is not a unitary facility of the brain. Memory disorders do not merely distress the entire memory; somewhat they only damage chosen memory systems (Madan, 2011).
Memory is a psychological utility. Differentiating physical and psychological sources of memory loss is a type of hand-waving that signifies the existing deficiency of perception regarding the association between brain and mind (Kopelman, 2002).
Amnesia is an anomalous mental condition where learning and memory are affected out of every section to further cognitive functions in a responsive and alert patient. Amnesia can influence learning of new things due to disorder in the retrieval, storage and encoding memories. Amnesia can also cause trouble in remembering formerly obtained memories, which might be general information, personal experiences or perceptuomotor abilities (Pujol & Kopelman 2003).
Particular circumstances of momentary amnesia emerge to be prompted by means of an actually trifling occurrence, linked to stages of emotional stress, and encompass a neuropsychological contour that is tricky to settle with the dysfunction of focal neurological. Circumstances have variably been called, ‘functional’, ‘hysterical’ or ‘psychogenic’ amnesia (Kopelman, 2002).
Amnesia is classified into several different types. The type in which amnesia is based on the proximal cause of the injury includes psychogenic amnesia and organic amnesia. Organic amnesia is caused by biological occurrences such as tumors, brain disorders, temporal lobe surgery, degenerative diseases, strokes and chronic practices of some drugs. Psychogenic amnesia or the psychological memory disorder has much more uncommon incidences than organic amnesia. Psychogenic amnesia is described by a dissociation or loss of a person’s past experiences and identity (Madan, 2011).
Psychogenic amnesia (PA) is an impaired contact to intervallic memories for a definite period, or combination of these memories, in the framework of psychogenic stress. Speculations regarding PA emphasize the neuropsychological and phenomenological resemblance involving organic amnesia and PA and imparted PA to the limbic memory system dysfunction (Arzya et al., 2009).
Some theories regard emotional stress as cause of PA, similarly associated to the limbic system movements. Nonetheless, different from patients with organic amnesia, PA frequently goes with unexpected loss of personal identity and may consequently be associated with dysfunction in more self-related, posterior, brain sections (Arzya et al., 2009).
Psychogenic amnesia is characterized through abrupt inception of an incapability to contact memories from a widespread enfold of earlier periods, frequently with loss of personal identity. Loss of personal identity is an indication otherwise merely observed in the most recent phases of degenerative disease of the brain. In bleak contrast, new-fangled knowledge is generally conserved. The memory loss may perhaps be coupled with episodes of peripatetic. This stage is called the ‘fugue state’ for which the person is also afterward amnesic.
Neuropsychological investigations do not have any reliable guide of discrepancy that might assist with analysis. A narration of psychiatric illness or drug misuse is not rare and the patient could have encountered an occurrence of ‘organic’ momentary amnesia some time ago. Projection is changeable among some individuals considerably improving their recollections in reaction to a trivial signal, along with others staying enduringly hindered. Psychogenic memory loss could be particular to some events such as in the framework of crime-related amnesia and posttraumatic stress disorder (Kopelman, 2002).
Psychogenic periods of memory loss could be situation-specific as become known in amnesia for childhood sexual abuse and in amnesia in the partial recollection in post-traumatic stress disorder. In some other circumstances, psychogenic amnesia engages a more inclusive memory shortage, repeatedly go with loss of personal identity.
The term ‘psychogenic amnesia’ is more favorable because it does not create suppositions concerning mechanism unlike the term ‘dissociative’ amnesia; or regarding the level to which memory loss fallout from unaware progressions (‘hysterical’ amnesia), rather than intentional, motivated or mindful progressions (‘exaggerated’ amnesia). Then again, the expression ‘psychogenic’ constructs suppositions regarding primary aetiology and the time and conditions a psychological stress is adequate to turn into ‘psychogenic’ (Kopelman, 2002).
A psychogenic fugue is an unexpected loss of every part of autobiographical memories as well as the sense of personal or self-identity. It is frequently coupled with episodes of traveling, and a following amnesic gap subsequent to recovery. The wandering circumstances typically last for a couple of hours or days. If psychogenic fugue stays much longer than days, it possibly will develop into the so-called ‘focal retrograde amnesia’. However, the likelihood of premeditated imitation has to be extremely measured. The three major factors that lead to psychogenic fugue are; rigorous impaling stress like emotional or marital disagreement, monetary troubles or accusation of offending; disheartened temper or disposition that caused by the consideration of suicide prior to the experience and; a history of a temporary organic amnesia or having experienced rigorous head damage.
Psychogenic focal retrograde amnesia
The patent with psychogenic focal retrograde amnesia typically loses the whole memories of his or her earlier life; along with a prolonged memory loss. However, fresh learning is conserved. The patient confirms just small mutilations on recognized procedures of anterograde memory. Focal retrograde amnesia perseveres unlike fugue that is a temporary state. But it does not entail personal identity loss; even though the patients frequently state or claim that they have regained their identity. Wandering is atypical. Studies imply that this disorder usually trails slight or minor head damage, ensuing a discussion concerning whether the disarray is caused by the brain injury or is really psychogenic. In the early phases, it is usual for patients to fall short in recognizing partners and relatives. Any causal stressors are frequently not willingly evident, and the relatives unintentionally reinforce the patient assuming and preserving the sick character (Kopelman, 2002).
Retrograde amnesia means the lack of ability to remember knowledge that had been obtained previous to the damage or illness that formed the amnesia. Characteristically, for patients with amnesia, the degree of the retrograde amnesia diminishes for knowledge more sequentially inaccessible from the moment of brain injury, with extremely deprived recollection of proceedings that happened nearer in occasion to the event of the brain injury. This instance is called the temporal gradient of retrograde amnesia. For instance, at the time examined for fresh history, such as information of well-known people or proceedings, amnesic patients are expected to properly provide data on the subject of people and proceedings that were mentioned in the news prior to their injury. Nevertheless, memories of people and events that were remarkable just previous to their damage are not retained (Wingfield & Cronin-Golomb, 2001).
Furthermore, functional retrograde amnesia (RA) refers to a total or fractional loss of distant memories in the company of a predominance of psychological features with lack of matching compositional brain pathology. The state might happen subsequent to acute trauma or exceedingly stressful incidents the same as in dissociative disorders. The word ‘functional’ is occasionally employed with ‘psychogenic’, signifying the relationship between the cause of psychological aetiology and inception of amnesic indications. Yet, functional RA can also be found in neurologically healthy persons in who do not have either psychological ancestors or emotional disorders were discovered. These instances indicate that people can have functional disorders in memory-related brain structures below thresholds for recognition. Then again, the likelihood of unexposed emotional troubles or earlier psychiatric indications has to be measured (Fujiwara et al., 2008).
In this regard, RAs of implicit organic source can actually have been totally or to a certain extent attributable to psychological means. Similarly, even past considerable brain injury, indications of RA can cause by principal psychological means and materialize inconsistently to the injury level and position. No regular advancement to differentiate between psychogenic and neurological types of RA in the nonappearance of explicit confirmations from each side. Furthermore, the fact that nearly all preceding information was a distinct occurrence of partial and oversimplified facility of earlier instances. Consequently, the peculiarities of the patients in also hampered the construction of precisely demarcated diagnostic criteria. The inconsistencies in retrograde memory loss along with inconsistent levels of anterograde learning injury might provide significant suggestions of the causes psychogenic. Nonetheless, inquiries remain regarding the way a psychological mechanism affects autobiographical–intervallic memories consistently at the same time as sending-off a few semantic memories unharmed (Fujiwara et al., 2008).
The majority of the occurrence of memory disorders is related with a temporally partial retrograde amnesia. Reports state that these momentary amnesia occurrences are caused by the interruption of customary brain role for short periods with no lasting causes of brain injury as observed from congested head injury obtained from a car accident or sports injury inquisitive by means of the consolidation procedure. Further localized, longer, disorders can be seen in fleeting ischemic events where there is language skills loss even if the memory of the word-finding activity remains (Madan, 2011).
Differentiation of psychogenic from organic amnesia
Distinction of psychogenic from organic amnesia and other impairments is frequently straightforward, even though the source of psychogenic focal retrograde amnesia is much more contentious. There are a quantity of similarities and differences between psychogenic amnesia and neurological circumstances. In neurological setting such as transient global amnesia, there is generally comparative preservation of previous memories but stern destruction of fresh memories; while in psychogenic amnesia previous memories are totally missing, but latest memories, acquired after having such condition, remain.
The psychosocial strains influence anterior power or the administrative arrangement, therefore restraining the reclamation of periodic and autobiographical memories for the duration of a psychogenic focal retrograde or fugue amnesia. The reticence will worsen when a patient is exceedingly stimulated, awfully depressed, or when there is an earlier familiarity of momentary amnesia. The inhibition may possibly influence the individual semantic principle structure that may create a momentary loss of familiarity of personal identity. Regardless of the containment of autobiographical memory reclamation by the anterior inhibitory systems, anterograde knowledge is capable of occurring from typical environmental stimulus by means of the unbroken medial diencephalic mechanism (Kopelman, 2002).
In summary, psychogenic amnesia is particular in every situation. Psychogenic amnesia is a dissociative disorder. The subject undergoes a loss of autobiographical memory for a definite past. Psychogenic fugue is the amnesia that covers the entirety or the majority of the patient’s subject’s life; it is as well in the company of a loss of personal identity and physical relocation.
Psychogenic amnesia is defined through sudden inception of an incapability to contact memories from a widespread enfold of earlier periods, frequently with loss of personal identity. Loss of personal identity is an indication otherwise merely observed in the most recent phases of degenerative disease of the brain. Psychogenic periods of memory loss could be situation-specific as become known in amnesia for childhood sexual abuse and in amnesia in the partial recollection in post-traumatic stress disorder. Retrograde amnesia is the lack of ability to remember knowledge that had been obtained previous to the damage or illness that formed the amnesia. Furthermore, functional retrograde amnesia (RA) refers to a total or fractional loss of distant memories in the company of a predominance of psychological features with lack of matching compositional brain pathology Conventionally, the dissociative disorders have been recognized to be caused by trauma and further psychological strains; although the presented facts supporting this theory are overwhelmed by poor method of study. Actions commonly entail improving and working by seemingly reserved or separated memories of shock; presently, there are little controlled result studies.
Arzy, S., Wissmeyer, C. & Blanke, O. (2009), Psychogenic amnesia and self-identity: a multimodal functional investigation. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 174:32–39.
Fujiwara, E., Brand, M., Kracht, L., Kessler, J. & Diebel, A. (2008).Functional retrograde amnesia: A multiple case study. Elsevier Masson, 44: 29-45.
Kopelman, M. (2002). Psychogenic amnesia. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Madan, Christopher. (2011). Organic amnesia: A diversity in deficits. Alberta: Department of Psychology, University of Alberta.
Pujol, Mireia & Kopelman, Michael. (2003). Psychogenic Amnesia. Practical Neurology, 3:292-299.
Wingfield, A. & Cronin-Golomb, A. (2001). Amnesia. Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, 1-4.