Gender is a fundamental element that renders its influence in every social phenomenon. The distinctions are obvious in the aspects of expectations, attributes and miles stones. No doubt, the physical strength of males is apprehended with the supremacy of astuteness and intelligence. The male gender is raised in the same manner to cultivate the contextual skills, whilst the females are protected and preserved as less capable entities to secure themselves. Herein, it must be considered that sociology considers gender as a completely secular element in reference the element of sex. The feature of gender and its allocated expectation are cultivated by the society under the influence of culture, norms and traditions. While, ‘sex’ is a biological feature, gifted to an individual by nature. Thus, under the impression of social phenomenon it is the factor of perception that makes all the difference in the referred dimensions. This refers to cultural conception in the context of gender and natural (biological) possession in the context of sex.
In reference to perceptions and expectations, the gender and sex have an obvious influence of culture when studied from the aspect of sociological considerations. The dichotomous aspect of gender in a society is recognizable in every dimension of social and cultural context. For example, in the United States the femininity and masculinity of gender is apprehended with a different perception in contrast to the other societies. The wide horizons of discrimination of the concept of gender from sociological phenomenon, in the geographical dimensions can be studied with the example of The United States. The United States have made the cultural stamping over the ground of gender as a prominent feature of its
Sociological phenomenon. Such a stamping can be substantiated with the model of the population of Navajo culture called Berdaches. The masculine populace of the place was biologically normal men, yet they were categorized as third gender (a mix of male and female genders) by society and suitable to marry another male (outside community). The marriage was not considered to be a homosexual bond, but a normal nuptial. Hence, it can be stated that the dimension of gender and sex are two distinct fields of study from the context of sociology. The impression of the conception in the two dimensions is imposed with a thread of biological implication along with cultural perceptions. Thus, the biological implication that is about sex is natural and fixed, with the least chances of modification. While, the gender context is culture crafted which grants it a tendency to modify and update according to circumstantial alterations.
The influence of such a perception of society is directly cast over the populace of a place under the shadow of the social gender and sex phenomenon of a place. The outcomes of the influences are observed in the horizons of appearance, expectations and identity. The accumulation of the referred features curtails the style and social behavior of an individual in the society. Thus, the social phenomenon does not consider identity of a gender from the perspective of biology only, but the other factors of social and cultural aspects as well. Hence, the sociological phenomenon in the horizons of gender and sex, elaborate the influence of the two arenas over the grounds of the biological makeup (nature / sex) implications and brought up (nurture / cultural) implication with social surroundings that determine the gender impression of a society.
The influence of the concepts of gender and sex together, cultivate the range of expectations of an individual in context to socialization in society, apart from the scope of appearance. Such a matter is covered under the topic of gender socialization that read the expectations of a society from the context of social settings in the dimensions of life style. Gender specialization apprehends the scope of influence of a gender in society in the horizon of daily life activities, social settings comprehending social relationships (friends, family, and acquaintance), political and social deeds. Conception and perception developments that cultivate self-reflection are all features that develop certain shape of gender socialization of a society. Likewise, the adherence of the conceptions and perception of the rules and agents of gender socialization grants approval or disapproval to an individual from the perception of sociological phenomenon. The theory of gender socialization has a two way influence, that is it does not only it provide a framework of expectations to an individual for lifting, but also it proffers the concept of gender identity that allows an individual to follow a formula reflection in which one have to mold him / herself and view others, as well. For example, the exploration from the context of sociological phenomenon is witnessed to develop certain behavior in context to use and abuse of alcohol, drugs and even weapons. Likewise, evidences have also been gathered to prove the capacity to conceive occurring and display emotions in the context of gender identityThe subject is regarded as an Important Social Phenomenon' which is addressed with the support of theories and sociological frameworks.
Beck, U. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford University Press.
Giddens, A. (2013). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.. John Wiley & Sons.
Mead, G. H. (2009). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Vol. 1. University of Chicago press.
Shilling, C. (2012). The body and social theory. . Sage.