Issues of civil relationships have recently been much in the media or news. This is as a result of the increasing tragic events which made people to urgently question the relation of the disparate grouping in a larger society to each other so that the society can function and interact as one. For the purpose of achieving this unity, integration into ordinary life and assimilation are some of the suggested factors. Identifying some core shared values that form the basis of oneness can also work to achieve unity in the society. This attitude, virtues, and values should be identified as the necessity of the civil framework which enables civil relationships to thrive and exist in the society. Aristotle believes that ethics is an eminently practical science in which the knowledge of the action is found and finalized. According to his sense of reason, the criticism of Plato is very radical as he deliberated on the issue of ontologically good and which according to him was a supreme idea unattainable by man. According to Aristotle, the world is eternal and unique, while the universe is a space centered on Earth. In the discussion of how human beings relate in the society, it is essential to explore some simple forms of relationships advanced by philosophers such as Aristotle. This is because when a person investigates these relationships, he or she learns and at the same time extrapolate with the consideration of looser as well as wider forms of societal interconnectedness. This paper, therefore, explores Aristotle's ideas on civil relationships and review 'best places to work traits' traits from the Best places to Work Institute. It explores whether the Aristotle's civil relationships ideas is a feasible aspiration for the larger democracies in terms of working environment.
It is mistaken and erroneous to view Aristotle's civic relationship to be a literal form of friendship. According to Aristotle, ideas on civil relationships make more sense when considered in the metaphorical sense. With regards to happiness, Aristotle argues that it was a waste of time to copy or repeat everything he wrote about the conditions affecting the ultimate happiness or highest good in the society. In fact, that some goods of person souls and his personal reasons are the virtues that play the greatest role in a person's happiness. He further says that virtues like generosity, sense, courage, justice, and a sense when are always depends so much on the correctness of the law and acquired through proper upbringing. Good laws are some of the reasons why the majority of people derive good evidence out of their character and it in turn contributes directly to living a good life. Aristotle notes that the highest good desired by everyone in the society is the happiness coupled with other interdependent factors. Although, in the society understands everyone his or her own unique ways of attaining this happiness. While others put in enjoyment and pleasure, others put their wealth as the ultimate happiness and achievement of a good life. However, true happiness to Aristotle is the final date and something perfect that attracts all different determinations. That one that is alone is the one said to be sufficient. This makes life to be selectable as there is no need of nothing and individuals believe that what constitute happiness. It is significantly complemented by alternative rational virtues in the event that the virtues are perfect and excellent according to the set standards. Flowing from happiness then virtue comes, and a fundamental distinction is made between dianoetic virtues and human virtues. These are both parts of ethical virtues and enlightened soul that are under the control of reason and corresponds to their appetitive soul (Schwarzenbach 37).
As a result of this discourse of civic relationships, and since each and every one choice and knowledge is towards good, all goods are achievable through actions. Several people refer and are in agreement that these actions are the ingredients of happiness. These people also believe that happiness is greatly concerned with the ability of an individual to express himself and at the same time live well as per the societal standards. Thus, it is not a point of contention that the elements of civic relationships such as deliberation, happiness, friendship, virtues, and justice are interrelated or intertwined. As in much as some individuals may disagree with Aristotle's definition of civic relationships, the majority of constituting elements are similar. In fact, some individuals argue that happiness to them is something which is conspicuous and visible , as wealth, pleasure, honor or some other things. The majority of people in the society agrees that civic friendships dictate the manner in which people relate to each other in a society or public sphere.
The civil elements of the friendship and happiness in the society refers to the fact that all of them must have some sought of relation to the public sphere or the civil realm. The manner in which people relate with each other in a civilized society in not synonymous with citizenry but should in addition provide some illumination in the manner in which individuals relate at the civil level. The term civic in the relationship or friendship must refer to some sought of politically relevant friendship so that it can be differentiated with other forms of friendship or happiness in the society. The friendship elements must also be clearly defined so that it carries enough characteristics that make it distinguishable. In order to consider the manner in which people relate with each other in a polity, it essential that some of the ideas of Aristotle such as friendship, happiness, justice, and virtues among others be considered (Schwarzenbach 38).
In the day-to day running of the state, individuals engage in activities, some of which can be said to be deliberate while others are incidental. While some activities could be attributable on the people who direct the state, others can be attributed to individuals themselves. These acts resulted to civic relationship acts to individuals, groups, and natural environment. Hence, the need to punish people for their wrongdoings developed in the concept of criminal liability in the event that it does not result to happiness to the majority members of the society. By reviewing the intimate civil connections, it is acceptable that an individual can extrapolate and discover the looser as well as, the broader types of civil human interconnectedness. Connecting the ideas of Aristotle on civil relationships has a long time political philosophy.
Aristotle believed in civic relationships as good liberty and independence that he had his own definitions of friendship, happiness, justice, and deliberation. He was not willing to cede his ground, and he was among the first philosophers to utilized his civic philosophies to modernize the nation. He convinced the government to apply elastic interpretation of the ideas on civil friendship for the establishment of a united state. He showed sympathy to the poor and advocated for more rights and powers to the state governments. For instance, he advocated for administration of justice and preservation of virtues that were to result to friendships and happiness in the society. This is because his form of companionship advanced a direct attachment between the civic and the individual. This is one of the greatest sense of flourishing life in the society as well as civic friendship that is a crucial human good. He argues that civic friendships should assist in sustaining the perform of fairness and regulation in the state or society. That it should also assist to cultivate individual friendship based on virtue. In the event that individuals outlook the nature of their civil associates, they reach simultaneously in broad and different agreement of the affairs of the state and public principle (Schwarzenbach 39).
The Best Places to work Institute outlines of the 'best places to work' traits that are beneficial to individuals in regards to social and economic issues. These traits came out after the institute conducted several research in a number of companies across the world. These traits are also essential in developing unique leadership development and organizational change training programs. These training is most of the times developed for companies intending to increase employee engagement as well as productivity, financial performance, and decreasing rates of turnover to improve overall markets. The data has a strong basis on Great Place to Work Model and borrows heavily from employee surveys. The data in then translated un actionable feedback used by companies to improve staff engagement as well improve the working conditions at the company (Branham, Leigh, and Hirschfeld 56).
The best place to work should have a healthy working environment, they should be a good working relationship between managers and employees; there should be an equal opportunity in promotion and training. There should also be fairness, pride, credibility, camaraderie, and respect between managers and employees as well as among employees themselves. Companies that are the best place to work will have strongest employee engagement evidence, best applied management programs and practices, and highest levels of trust. Quality and safety in employment is the essential variables in delivering and establishing a responsive, accessible and best place to work environment. This refers to the organization of the resources in the most effective way with the intention of meeting the health needs of those employees who are in high demand for prevention and care. The intention is to give the employees safe care and working environment that meets the required standards without any waste of resources. Therefore, quality and safety is measured by examining the quality, and the way resources are used in providing the best place to work environment and facilities within the purview of Occupational Safety and Health, as well as welfare of the employees (Branham, Leigh, and Hirschfeld 57).
The best place to work also refers to companies with reward systems and incentive plans such as financial incentives, bonuses, recognition together with other intangible rewards as feelings of challenge and accomplishment. Reward systems will only be an effective tool for motivating organizational members to support the strategy implementation plans and efforts. The commonly used reward system which can be essential for the best place to work companies includes promotions, stock options, praise, salary raises, recognition; awards based on successful strategy implementation and increased job autonomy. Companies should make these rewards available to top managers and spread down among other employees through the organization. At the partnership level involving partners in the profit sharing, can sometimes be essential. Gain sharing can also be used at departmental or divisional levels, to closely link organizational rewards to performance.
According to Branham, Leigh, and Hirschfeld (64), organizations that are best to work with employ technology in the management and operation of all their stores so that they can provide quality products and services to protect the brand name. The technology that the company applies in the operation of the stores must be fit for the performance and reward strategy in order to achieve its successful implementation. Luca should also use technology that will differentiate the company's products from other competitors on the basis of quality and services which is very essential in that industry. This usually requires a tighter state of the art and control of the equipment that does not allow loopholes for low quality services or products. The business should not lack sufficient funds for the implementation of the new performance or market strategy and some companies still use the older equipments to reduce the immediate costs for procuring new equipments.
Aristotle's ideas on civic relationships have some resemblance or similarities with the contemporary best place to work notions. This is because demonstrates that every idea in a society that is now the workplace should seek to do good at all the times. Doing good in the sense of business means adhering to the concerns of the employees, customers, the environment, and the general public. This means that companies should endeavor to do good by offering employees with safe and healthy environment and producing quality goods at the same time. In the event that employees have a better working environment and the companies produces quality goods, there will be great happiness in the society. The issue of friendship also comes in when there are good working relations between top managers and employees and among employees themselves as well as in the event that the company fulfils her corporate social responsibility (Branham, Leigh, and Hirschfeld 45). The primary focus in both the good place to work and Aristotle ideas is the well-being of individuals in the society.
Branham, Leigh, and Mark Hirschfeld. Re-engage: How America's Best Places to Work Inspire Extra Effort Through Extraordinary Engagement. Dubuque, Iowa: McGraw-Hill Contemporary Learning, 2010. Print.
Schwarzenbach, Sibyl A. On Civic Friendship: Including Women in the State. New York: Columbia University Press, 2009. Print.