Essays on Jury Duty

Introduction

Traditionally, employment relationships have generally been governed by the common law doctrine of employment at will. In the nineteenth-century American common law, the employment-at-will doctrine became the norm. The at-will-doctrine holds that unless the parties expressly agree in particular duration, the employment relationship can be served by either employer or the employee at any time and for any reason. According to the Bureau of Labour Statistics, however, there are major exceptions to Employment-at-Will including implied contract exception; policy exception and convention of good faith and fair dealing (Muhl, 2001). Employment at will is basically a voluntary and indefinite employment ...

Georgia recognizes the doctrine of employment at will. Employment at will means that in the absence of a written contract of employment for a defined duration, an employer may terminate an employee for a good cause, bad cause, or no cause at all, so long as it is not an illegal cause . An employer cannot terminate an employee for discriminatory reasons, a breach of employment contract, or in retaliation for exercising their employee rights. Discriminatory reasons include race, color, sex, religion, national origin, etc. In order to better understand how at-will employment works, I will provide three different scenarios ...

Summary of employment-at-will doctrine from text

The employment at will doctrine is a legal doctrine that states that an employee who is hired for an indefinite period of time, may be terminated or end the employment at any time. Employment at will also means that the terms of the employment with regards to the employee can be altered at any time without notice and without consequences. For instance, an employer can reduce the employee’s wages, make changes in the employee’s benefits or change the terms of paid time off. In many states, employment at will doctrine has exceptions. One of the most common ...

Management

Summary of Employment-at-Will Doctrine The employment-at-will doctrine has its roots in the feudal doctrine of master and servant, wherein the master-servant relationship is viewed based on status rather than contract. H.G Wood’s treatise on the master-servant relationship held that ‘a general or indefinite hiring is prima facie a hiring at will’ (DeGiuseppe, 1981, p.6) This concept evolved in the United States as employment-at will. According to the doctrine, an employer can terminate the services of an employee at any time for any reason except an illegal one, and even for no reason at all, without risking legal ramifications. ...

At Will Employment Issues

According to information found at the National Conference of State Legislatures website. “Employment relationships are presumed to be “at-will” in all U.S. states except Montana.” This means that employers and employees can end the relationship at will or without cause or threat of retaliation from the termination of employment of either party. There are not any legal requirements that surround the termination such as a period or a specific reason involved. Every employee in the United States, except Montana, is considered to be an at-will employee unless he or she has signed a specific contract with the employer at ...

The breastfeeding of a baby by the mother is an important act of nurture that deserves to be encouraged for the interests of both the child and maternal health. Mothers are supposed to breastfeed their babies sparingly to assure them of normal health and proper growth and development. Many organizations such as the WHO, the CDC as well as the American Academy of Pediatrics encourage extended baby breastfeeding as a way of ensuring the health of both the child and the mother and as a way of mitigating public health problems (Ketan & Ketan 2005). Doctors and medical experts usually state that ...

Book Review of “The Jury: Trial and Error in the American Courtroom”

The book of Adler reveals that the American jury system is essential element of the criminal justice system, but criticized the incompetency of some members of the jury. In fact, there are many instances when the jurors have clearly performed unsatisfactorily in arriving at important decisions which lack valid reasons. In most cases, the jury makes a decision for its own beneficial gain. Adler condemns the jurors for making tainted decisions, but he does not make criticisms directly on the actual performance of the jury, but considered some external factors that are beyond the control of the jurors, which do ...

My Responsibility To America Essay

United States is a democratic country which, as Abraham Lincoln puts, has "government of the people, by the people, for the people". To simplify, in a democratic nation, it is the citizens who form and run the government and the government takes actions listening to the voice of the citizens. A citizen is defined as an official member of a country. In USA, anyone born in the country gets citizenship by birth. Immigrants also become citizens of USA through naturalization. But one doesn't become a true American and citizen of a country just by acquiring citizenship. In order to be a true citizen of one's ...

Introduction

Marder (2005) reports that jury trials are commonly used in the criminal trials in the common law legal system. The United States is famous for its consistence use of juries over bench judges in criminal legal tussles. The use of juries has extended to include civil cases in the United States and Canada. The jury process in the United States tends to be high profile discussions. However, legal scholars admit that the public exaggerate how often juries are used. Marder (2005) adds that, in the United States, there about 150, 000 thousand cases every year in the state Courts. ...