Essays on Verdict

Annotated Bibliography4

Introduction5 Literature Review..6 Conclusion....11 References..12 Abstract Negative (opposing or intimidating) events arouse robust and speedy physiological, rational, emotive, and social reactions. This organization of the organism is accompanied by physical, cognitive, and interactive results that diminish, lessen, and even wipe out the influence of that incident. This array of mobilization-minimization seems to be bigger for undesirable events than for unbiased or positive happenings. Hypothetical explanations of this response form are reviewed in this paper. Further, it will give a verdict on whether negative bias has been helpful or harmful to the process of human evolution. It is established that ...

Introduction

Maeder, et al. (2016) defined “CSI effect” as the unreasonable expectations of jurors on the sophistication of forensic science as a consequence of learning about it through television programs, such as the CSI (Crime Scene Investigation), resulting in fewer convictions in the absence of sophisticated forensic evidence against the accused. Lobo and Schnobrich-Davis (2015) referred to this as the “Tech effect”, which essentially extends the definition into the advances in information dissemination technology and beyond ‘crime scene television shows’.

Article Summary

Research questions: The Lobo and Schnobrich-Davis (2015) study was guided by three research questions: (1) Does the CSI effect (as ...

Part 1

Objective: in this critical analysis, you are expected to demonstrate an understanding of public health ethics and legal issues. Also, you are required to actively engage with the subject and come up with a substantial perspective on it.

Introduction

This critical analysis will outline the main purpose of the public health ethics and legal issues for protecting and upholding public health. Public policies and social programs are some of the aspects that constitute a good public health. Also, some patients with distinct issues contribute to the wellbeing of the public health, especially in a situation of unethical event regarding health ...

Abstract

With the ever-growing population at one end and the deteriorating ecosystem at the other, people are questioning the efficiency of the two approaches to farming now more than ever. One approach is the organic cultivation while the other follows the conventional techniques. There seems to be a divide where a few people support one type of agriculture while the rest stand to the other side. In the midst of all of this debate and an unspoken war on which side has more valid arguments for implementation of their stance, the basic differences in between the two approaches end up ...

Introduction

The main legal issue raised in the present scenario is whether Andrea was suffering from mental insanity when she committed the aforementioned crimes and therefore whether she can successfully rely on the defense of insanity, say, on appeal. Further, this problem raises the issue of if Andrea’s ex-husband, Rusty, bears any criminal responsibility in the crime. As a general defense to criminal liability for all offenses, the defense of insanity allows the jury to return a not guilty by reason of insanity verdict. Under this defense, the accused person may claim that at the time they committed the ...

Steps in Criminal Jury Trial

Upon being charged with a crime, the defendant is provided with some documents including an appearance notice and promise to appear in court, summons, the information, etc. This states the charges, the offense, and then date, time and place of the opening court appearance (Walston-Dunham, 2011). In this instance, the case now proceeds to the trial phase. For a case to be complete, it has to follow through six main steps i.e. selecting a jury, opening statements, evidence presentation and cross-examination, the final remarks, jury instructions, and finally the jury verdict. Selecting the jury - The first step begins ...

Review 1: Virtual Machines

Introduction Conclusion Is the document motivated by a use case? The document explains the company’s need in the introduction. The company seeks to create a software but it lacks the proper machines for its development. Hence, the author comes up with suggestions towards solving the problem.

Does Author Clearly Explain Proposed Solution to Problem

Does the Author Clearly Explain How The Proposed Solution Solves The Problem? Is the Paper Formal or Informal? The paper follows the formal structure as per the proper tone used in the document. The author directs most of his points towards a learned person or official.

Spelling and Grammar

Can the document be used by ...

This paper will look into the impeachment of Bill Clinton. This move was instigated by the (HoR) House of Representatives because of two charges which were perjury and the hindrance of justice. These charges arose from his adulterous acts with Monica Lewinsky who was a former intern in the White House and several charges of sexual harassment. This move changed a lot on the issue of presidency. It went on to show that the presidency could be overturned. He was acquitted of the charges by the house of Senate on February 1999 (Washingtonpost.com: Clinton Accused, 1999). This paper will ...

If the police tap into the local telephone exchange of AT&T to know when a certain phone number becomes active with users without a warrant, the case will face a very difficult suppression motion. There is a safeguard against such processes; the Fourth Amendment. Hypothetically, if the police attempt to stake out a suspect’s location and try to get information whenever someone makes a call from the property, a warrant becomes mandatory. However, it is surprising the courts find that a warrant is unnecessary. The interpretation of the law should coexist along with the context in order to ...

886 F.2d 14 28 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 823

v.

BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION, d/b/a Busch Gardens,

The Old Country, Defendant-Appellee No. 138, Docket 89-7378.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Argued Sept. 13, 1989.Decided Sept. 15, 1989

Summary

On August 23, 1986, Willie Mae Gray and her two daughters went to Busch Gardens, an entertainment park in Williamsburg. She boarded a small train and tumbled off and harmed herself. Busch Gardens representatives dispatched a medical aid group to the site and called an emergency to evacuate her for medical attention. One of Plaintiff's Daughters accompanied her to the hospital while the other went to record the incident with the nurse. The records ...

For years obtaining a marriage license was a requirement in order to say that your marriage was legal. In some states, there is a particular time frame in order to get your license before you marry or else you will have to delay the nuptials. However, each state has different requirements for couples wishing to be granted a marriage license. Marriage licenses are also used to prevent what the court considers to be inappropriate marriages. But after the U.S. Supreme Court made the decision to allow gay marriages to become legalized, some do not see the purpose of a ...

The Constitution of the United States of American offers a wide range of guarantees and rights to the people of the nation. The motive behind the Bill of Rights is to protect the American people from anarchical and tyrannical regimes. The reason for the US Supreme Court’s blunder in the verdict supporting corporate funding for election campaigns is due to comprehension (Cornell University Law School, 2011). They did not interpret the First Amendment of the US Constitution in the proper context. The enactment of laws and the subsequent consequences should be in line with the context of why ...

In the court systems, various felonies are penalized following the court's guidelines. There are a variety of particulars that go into a sentencing pronouncement. An individual who commits a financial fraud may go to jail for a longer period, compared to someone who commits murder, as is the case of Bernard Madoff, who went to jail for 150 years for committing financial crime and Karla Homolka was sentenced to 12 years in prison for murder. It is, however, clear that an extensive range of verdicts are not necessarily rational to the victims or the scam culprits. This paper looks ...

a. Prior to 1972, the death penalty legal procedure varied from one state to the other. However, in Furnam v. Georgia, a Supreme Court case which was decided in 1972, the constitutionality of the death penalty was addressed. In this case, the Supreme Court decided that the death penalty was imposed b as a result of an arbitrary and discriminatory process (Lynch and Haney 337). In this case, the defendants claimed that the imposition of the death penalty represented a violation of their rights under the 8th and the 14th Amendment (Dunn). Furman, the main defendant, was charged of ...

Part A. Answer the following questions based on the literature:

PTP (Pretrial publicity) creates a set of problems that forensic social/cognitive/experimental psychologists are uniquely qualified to address. What are some of these problems? Hint: they are psychological (social/cognitive) and legal (procedural/substantive). Thus, begin by addressing: why we are concerned with PTP at all? What are the alleged effects and what does the social science research indicate regarding these effects (be specific in citing literature)? One of the problems, caused by Pre-Trial Publicity is the cognitive one. This means that juries get the information about the case under some circumstances, identified by the pre-trial mass media articles, which they ...

The issue before the court in this case was whether this standard of proof was the proper standard to be used in determining retaliation or was the appropriate standard the “motivating factor” standard. Or more specifically, whether a plaintiff claiming retaliation can win a claim based on discrimination being a “motivating factor” for retaliation or must the plaintiff show that the discrimination was the reason for the retaliation. In addressing this issue, the United States Supreme Court determined that the standard of proof used to allege a claim for retaliation under Title VII must be the but for test ...

INTRODUCTION

The American criminal justice system is a very complex entity that most people hope to have little interaction with. Most people will tell you that it can also be incredibly confusing. People become most invested in court proceedings when they are high profile cases that garner a great deal of media attention; some that many are familiar with include Amy Fisher, Casey Anthony and, certainly, the O.J. Simpson trial. Another case that became the center of media attention is the trial of Jodi Arias. Jodi Arias is a 32-year-old woman who is currently serving a life sentence, without the ...

Question 1

Essential roles of trial judges are to establish privileges in courtrooms and qualifying privileges, while promoting fairness, morality and justice in the society. Judges are to uphold the constitution and the law of the jurisdiction that they occupy in the judiciary system. The judge assists claimants in solving issues amongst themselves by getting rid of the emotions and providing guidance to the claimants. The judge can achieve this on their own or with the help of a jury.

Question 2

Various states are accepting the use of non-unanimous verdicts due to the complex nature of certain cases. In some instances, the ...

NAMEUNIVERSITY

Abstract The aim of this essay is to work on a case of the mentally ill person, Mr. Fryer who was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and was living on the streets. Mr. Fryer committed a violent murder while being mentally unstable. In this essay I will highlight the consequences of the case and work on it as the defense for the Mr. Fryer. I will choose my way of actions and explain the logic behind them as well as providing clarification of aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the crime, addressing the issue as a forensic psychology professional and explaining ...

International Air Law

Air transport is currently considered the fastest and safest means of transport globally, Passengers want to feel secure when flying from one place to another and expect the airline to be responsible in the event where they experience any form of injury while under the airline’s care. However, the application of treaties and agreements in determining the liability of airlines in instances of accidents has triggered debates as to what extent the airlines are liable for the damages experienced while the plaintiff is onboard. A particular question arises regarding the extent of injuries that an airline can be ...

Moore versus Regents of The University of California is considered a landmark case because it was the first time that a court was faced with the ethical issues associated with biotechnology research and practices, which until this point, had remained mostly theoretical. In 1976, John Moore, a businessman from Seattle was diagnosed with hairy-cell leukaemia at The University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center by a well-known oncologist at the time, David W. Golde. As part of his treatment, Moore’s enlarged spleen was surgically removed, after which his disease went into remission . It was when Moore became aware of ...

During ancient times, the Greeks would turn to the gods for advice and intervention when presented with a problem whether it was to bring the rain to save their crops so that their families could eat or in the case of Oresteia, to decide whether or not a person accused of murder was truly guilty. The goddess they often turned to for guidance was the goddess Themis whose “ability to foresee the future enabled her to become one of the oracles at Delphi, which in turn led to her establishment as the goddess of divine justice” (Swatt, “Themis, Goddess ...

A jury is a group of randomly selected adults from the community to participate in the criminal justice process as jurors. The first step is to elect members to serve as jurors for a specified time. In the selection of the jurors, the jury commissioners use a list of designated people either by voter register or any other accepted criteria and ensures that the selected people reflect the diversity inherent in the community. All people over eighteen years have an equal chance to join the Jury services (“The answer book for jury service,” n.d.). For a felony, the jury ...

12 Angry Men is a film about a jury consisted of twelve men all of whom have their own system of beliefs which is hard to change. They are members of the community and are supposed to reach a verdict because they are jurymen. The legal system has flaws which is why the jurors need to decide about the guilt of the defendant. The defendant is an eighteen-year-old boy who allegedly stabbed and killed his father although there is reasonable doubt that he did not commit this crime. The juror Number Three is the man who looks for answers ...

Introduction

Myer is Australia's largest departmental store with more than 60 outlets and an online shop, where customers can order products from the comfort of their homes. The company employs 125,000 people and makes use of 1200 suppliers worldwide. Myer is embedded in the culture of Australia, as it has operated for more than 100 years in most cities. The company has a broad range of products; eleven in total, ranging from men wear to apparel and electrical goods. On the opposite, Myer has had mixed fortunes in the last five years. The company peaked in 2013, with revenues ...

“Slavery by another name”, the 90 minutes documentary which was aired on February 13, 2012, and directed by Sam Pollard, is an adaptation of the book by same (authored by Douglas Blackmon) name which won the Pulitzer Prize in 2009 (Pbs,"Slavery by another Name"). Like the book, this documentary has some very strong analytical insights on breaking the most popular misconception that the African- American (referred as ‘blacks’) were actually emancipated with the Abraham Lincoln’s proclamation of the year 1963. The documentary specifically works on the time span between the civil war and the World War II ...

Rodney G. King was an African-American taxi driver who came into limelight after being beaten up by four LAPD officers on the night of 2nd March 1991. The incident sparked nation-wide unrest and communal riots leading to fifty four deaths, seven thousand arrests, several injuries and losses worth millions of dollars. “The events brought to the forefront concerns about racism and police brutality within the L.A.P.D.” The incident took place at the night of March 2, 1991 when King was speeding his Hyundai car and was chased down by two patrol officers. He tried to dodge the cops for ...

The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Trial is one of the significant trials in the history of America’s Industrial Revolution. It involved hundreds of factory workers who were exposed to an unsafe work environment and unjustly treated within the criminal justice system. Nevertheless, its aftermath resulted in an overhaul of the legislative and policy framework governing the safety of workers in their work environment and building codes. On March 25, 1911 a deadly fire struck the eighth, ninth and tenth floors of the Asch building in New York resulting in a death toll of 146 people, 145 of whom were ...

Golub, Mark. "Plessy as "Passing": Judicial Responses to Ambiguously Raced Bodies in Plessy v. Ferguson." Law & Society Review, 39, no. 3 (2005): 563-600.

Synopsis

Homer Plessy’s decision to purchase a ticket as a white man, and to later confess that he is indeed black, was part of “a test case” conducted by the Creole community of New Orleans. As per the terms of the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890, Caucasians and persons of African descent were subject to traveling in different railway cars to serve the purposes of racial segregation. In the article, Golub quotes Plessy’ ...

12 Angry Men is a play written by Reginald Rose which deals with various topics describing human nature. People have to deal with prejudice, misconceptions and intuition by being devoted and taking time to find the truth. Serious decision cannot be brought quickly because forming a strong opinion about anything takes time and effort. There is much to learn from this play because it makes people question the possibility of human beings to grasp the truth. Prejudice gets in the way of truth, distorts a person’s mind and makes them think in a way which is biased. It ...

It May not Work in Politics

It May Not Work in Politics

Maxine Waters is a perfect example of individuals who are members of the Congress, accused of violating the American ethics. The ethics committee accused her of using her position in helping a monetary institution in which her husband had invested. They argued that the amount of stock belonging to her husband would have become “worthless” if that financial institution failed. The ethics committee also accused Maxine of prohibiting the lawmakers to use the positions they had for their financial gain. According to Fabian and Crabtree, the ethics committee suggested that she also violated ...

1. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act is a federal law that governs the Indian Gaming in order to provide security for the industry and restrict involvement from State governments. The Act signed by President Ronald Regan, provides financial stability to American Indian Governments and sets up a regulatory standard for all tribes to follow in the interest of fairness. The Act comprises of three classes. Class I has minor games such as raffles and conducted only during local festivals or ceremonies. The prizes awarded are in any range since the State Government cannot have any ceiling. The State officials ...

Even though the Grievant was on the last and final warning, she could not have easily jeopardized her job by smoking in the room. The grievant was well aware of the non-smoking rule and whilst she did smoke, she made sure she did not smoke during the working hours. D, the Grievant and E had contradicting testimonies as to what had transpired on 25th September 2002. B and C during the phone call claimed they had left the room early and none of them smoked and there was no way the cigarette could still be burning at 12.00. F ...

Little things in life – these are not a coffee in the morning, not silk skirts, not funny posts on live journal and new pictures on the mirror, not a fast, unlimited Internet, not a fashionable cafe, not new books or old silent films. It's not that, no. Little things in life are small, simple, unicellular, kind actions marked nearly touch. One man committed, did, asked, said something important for another, when it is not needed and is not asked to do. That are - those fractional pebbles and pearls that make up the picture, mosaic, fresco of our life. ...

Abstract

The movie Scottsboro: An American Tragedy, directed by Daniel Anker and Barak Goodman, was a documentary film based on a true story of the wrongful conviction of nine black boys (the Scottsboro Boys) for the rape of two women on a train. Directed by Daniel Anker, Barak Goodman, the movie follows the narrative that began on March 25, 1931 on a train that had set out from Chattanooga, Tennessee, with both African Americans as well as white homeless people who were travelling in search of work. The paper will explore the societal, political and economic environment at the time ...

English

Euthanasia has always been a controversial social issue in the cultures around the world. It is associated with ethical issues as well as social consequences. The term Euthanasia itself means, mercy killing. It is the process of ending someone's life based on that person’s own wish. When a person wants to end his life because he is suffering from a terminal disease or some other weakening condition, Euthanasia is often recommended. In most of the states of the United States, euthanasia is considered illegal. However in many states including California, physician-assisted suicides are legalized based on the requirement ...

Shortcomings of the Jury System as a Democratic Instrument

Introduction The jury system was incepted in the 16th century and introduced in England but practiced first by the pilgrims who settled in Massachusetts conducted the first jury trial in 1630. The jury system was seen as a fortification against the abuse of government power. The jurors helped the judiciary members in practicing democracy in the offices and law practice. Today, the jury panel is significant in the American history, this system works well but can be improved based on tackling the issues being faced. Jury decisions are usually based on the evidence presented, and they should be advised ...

Laws are established in a country so as to maintain order in the community. Laws are mainly written by leaders and failure to follow the laws leads to punishment by law enforcers or the judicial department. One may wonder whether or not citizens should follow the law without any objections. The obedience and lawbreaking issues appear to be a crucial issue in the real world as people struggle with enforcing and obeying laws stipulated in various institutions or nations. Some famous philosophers such as Socrates have played a significant role in the world of philosophy. Socrates defined and considered ...

Re: Prosecutorial Disclosure of Evidence to Defense Counsel

Beginning in the 1960s, the Supreme Court heard a number of cases that transformed the world of criminal procedure. The common theme running through all of these cases is that the Court began to focus on balancing the defendant’s rights against that of the government in a criminal proceeding. One of the areas that were specifically addressed was whether the Constitution required the Prosecutor to disclose evidence that tends to be advantageous to the defense. While the Prosecutor and the defense are adversaries in a criminal court of law, the Supreme Court maintains that under some circumstances, the ...

Introduction

Impeachment refers to a political trail that is conducted in order to remove the President of the United States from office. “In American Constitution, the term impeachment refers to a trail initiated by the House of Representatives and conducted by the Senate” (p. 654). In other words, the House decides whether or not there are grounds to impeach the President and the Senate conducts the trial in order to discover a verdict. Impeachment is not something that has happened a lot throughout history. In fact, Congress has only had serious discussions of impeachment for three presidents: Andrew, Johnson, Richard ...

Risk assessment is a practice that enables one determine the likely outcomes of a situation. In forensic psychology, experts assess the behavior of individuals to determine the likelihood of them committing a crime or causing harm to other citizens in the community (Roesch, Zapf, & Hart, 2010). Risk assessment, therefore, has a great impact on the life of an individual, as the outcomes can help either salvage a likely dangerous situation and thus, save a life or in some instances create controversy.

Current risk assessment practices have several strengths. For instance, with clinical records and historical tendencies, one is able ...

One of the most important values and ideals in American society is that all men are created equal. Although this country has an unfortunate history of slavery, what these words mean is that each person has the same rights as another person. The purpose of the rule of law is to ensure that no person is above the law. All persons, rich or poor, must follow and abide by the same law. There are no special exceptions, and people are not excused from complying with the law simply because they have money or means. But whether the legal system ...

Introduction

On 17 May 2011, the Kentucky Supreme Court decided that warrantless searches for drug related arrests were acceptable and did not violate the Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution (Doyle, 2011). This landmark judgment concluded the controversial argument for a search under exigent circumstances (Stamm, 2013). However, this judgment opened a different assortment of problems that subject US citizens to anarchy and undue harassment from the law enforcement community. The judgment’s interpretation by the police is questionable. It now encourages police departments to break into homes unannounced because of probable cause. They also know that evidence from such ...

IDEOLOGIES: OLD AND WORN OUT OR FRESH AND NECESSARY

FOR THE POLITICS OF TODAY

Harvard 8 pages 20 references 1.0 Ideologies: Old and worn out or fresh and necessary in politics today 1.1 Introduction All ideologies “embody an account of social and political reality and an account of how that reality could be bettered” (Finlay et al.2003:2). In other words ideologies are based in political and social reality but at the same time they are linked to a dream of a better world. Historically the Conservative and Liberal Party have been the two most powerful and popular types of ideologies in the United Kingdom (UK). The names of ...

Insanity Defense

Introduction One of the central issues of nowadays in the sphere of criminal law is insanity defense or so-called mental disorder defense, which is thought to be the basis for a person to be acquitted, or, namely, not be liable for an action. It is also characterized as ‘probably the most controversial criminal law doctrine, which, when used successfully, being a rare example in American law, gives a defendant, who has clearly committed the crime, even one as heinous as murder, is deemed not guilty and may not be punished It is noted that ‘mental illness has always played ...

Abstract

The paper is aimed at analyzing the criminal justice system. In this regard, the paper has examined the case of “11-CV-22122 Lawrence V. MS & RE Kesef Corporation” with respect to the concepts of prejudice along with the moral laws. The paper yields the outcomes that the court has made a viable decision entailing the criminal and moral laws that take in the biblical perspectives as well.

Introduction

The paper intends to analyze the essential components of a criminal justice system. For this purpose, the paper examines the “11-CV-22122 Lawrence V. MS & RE Kesef Corporation” case. It was trialed in the “ ...

I. Introduction Under the Sixth Amendment, one of the fundamental rights that a person accused of a crime holds is the right to a “public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district” where the crime was committed. Subsequent Supreme Court jurisprudence has interpreted the Sixth Amendment’s impartial jury provision to mean a jury composed of unbiased individuals in regards to how the perceive the defendant. While an important of consideration as to whether a juror is biased has focused on issues of race, ethnicity, gender, and national origin. An equally important consideration is whether a ...

Introduction

In a criminal trial, a defense team will introduce evidence and theories on the turn of events. The concept is to sell a reasonable story to the jury and save the client from conviction. This approach known as case defense strategies have two classifications. They are defense against an innocent person, and defense for a guilty client. The most popular of these strategies are sleepwalking and amnesia. Juries derive the verdict from expressed emotions and elements of evidence. Hence, defense attorneys often appeal to the emotional aspect of the jury. This paper will analyze two popular criminal cases involving ...

Social Justice issues:

The Verdict captures the growth of Frank Galvin, a character who goes from being a keen law graduate to a chronic alcoholic after being framed by his firm’s senior partner for jury trampling, when Frank tried to expose the corrupt practices his firm employed. Post this incident, Frank loses interest in his career. He defines a person who has given up on his life. The defining moment in Frank’s life occurs when he takes up a case of medical negligence in which, a woman developed complications during child-birth and was rendered permanently vegetative due to lack of ...

Introduction

Criminal justice administration is a challenging role since it determines the outcomes of operations conducted by any law enforcement agency. The decisions made by individuals in this role provide the infrastructure to prevent crime, uphold the law, serve and protect the people, and maintain the peace. The professional conduct of such administrators is often under threat due to undue pressure from local politicians, organized crime leadership, and even a Federal or State law enforcement agency. The chances for succumbing to pressure are high when ethics are lacking. Ethics influence the moral decisions that administrators make. Ethical behavior constitutes to ...

Socrates was, and still is, considered to be one of the most profound contributors to human philosophy that has ever lived. In the end, he was, if anything, a bit progressive for his time. This was reflected in the fact that he introduced many new thoughts and ideologies that ran counter to culture at the time. As such, he was eventually arrested, placed on trial, and set for execution. With many supporters around the region, Socrates likely could have gotten free somehow. This could have perhaps took place via an escape, but he chose no such way out. As ...

If we rely on the principles of equity and equality during the proceedings, we will without any doubt conclude that such features of any person as race, skin, nationality, age cannot be the basis for one’s assessment of his personality, especially when the judgment mainly depends on this verdict. Notwithstanding, different researches have proven the opposite state of affairs. For example, Chiricos and Crawford (Wang, 2008) after analyzing 38 different cases “claimed that blacks are more likely to be sentenced to prison than whites”; Spohn (p. 15) concluded that “racial minorities were sentenced more harshly than whites, if ...

Introduction

Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman were brutally murdered between 10:15 p.m. and 10:35 p.m. on Sunday June 12, 1994 in the front of Nicole Brown Simpson’s Brentwood condominium located in Los Angeles, California. O.J. Simpson committed these murders. The witness testimony and the evidence at the crime scene of the murders of Brown Simpson and Goldman clearly indicate that O.J. Simpson committed the crimes. However, the incompetence of the Los Angeles Police Department during the investigation of the murders allowed the defense to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors so that a non-guilty verdict ...

As depicted in the trial of O.J Simpson, there is a number of political, racial, social and psychological personality or demographic factors that may influence the selection, composition and possible elimination of members of a jury. Normally, trial judges, defense attorneys, prosecutors and plaintiff’s lawyer will want to ensure that jurors are both impartial and fair and that there are minimal chances of conflicts of interest, bias and the possibility of a jury constitution unfairly influencing or shaping the outcome of a case. In this week’s discussion, I will analyze the factors that might include or eliminate ...

ABSTRACT

The aim of the current research was to examine the impact of the wider view of CSR on operations management of any the organization. The aim was divided into four objectives i.e. This research was based on secondary analysis. The researcher collected secondary data from internet and peer-reviewed journals to achieve the research objectives. The researcher made the following conclusion from this research. Decision-making is the core responsibility of managers. Operations managers need ensure that business decisions do not affect the society negatively. The business should not make profits at the cost of the environment. The manager should ...

The Vogue Magazine sponsored, Selfridges Department Store new designer promotion event showcasing ten (10) up and coming designers and their brand names scheduled to be in stores Autumn and Winter 2013, will be released in the Promotional Supplement circulated in the October issue of Vogue UK.

Product – Top brands headlining the Vogue UK event to be stocked at Selfridges A/W 2013, include ten (10) core brands:

- Bec & Bridge - Australian brand founded by Becky Cooper & Bridget Yorstonin 2003. - O’2nd- South Korean brand founded in 1997. - Band of Outsiders launched by Scott Sternbergin 2004. - Max Osterweis founded in collaboration with designer Erin Betty in 2008. - Wunderkind founded by Wolfgang Wunderkind ...

Judicial Process: Describe the advantages and disadvantages of a 6 person jury. Would you prefer to have 6 or 12 juries if you were the defendant in a criminal trial? Why?

Various studies have shown that jury size can significantly impact the quality and speed of verdict-reaching. Studies have shown that a jury size of 6 has advantages, but it also has critical disadvantages. As in other matters, an involvement of lesser number of people imply quicker decision-making because there are less voices to be heard and is easier to coordinate. The same is true in jury size, according to studies. ...

Mergers, acquisitions and takeovers have been a vital part of the business world for many years. In today’s tough and dynamic economic environment, many companies are in most cases faced with decisions regard this particular actions with the aim of maximizing profit and shareholders value. Through strategies such as takeovers and mergers, a company can develop a competitive advantage and consequently manage to increase the shareholders’ value. This can happen through various forms such as two or more companies combining efforts, partnering on a given product, or even one company outright acquire the other company thereby taking over all it operations including ...

Policy and procedure directives are meant to ensure that all actions taken in every institution of the criminal justice system abides not only to the federal constitution, but also to ethics and human rights. Therefore, when policies and procedures are being drafted, their main foundation is the constitution. However, as history has shown, things are not always direct in the criminal justice system. An action taken in criminal justice system such a jail and that seemingly abides by the constitution may later be interpreted as an infringement on the constitutional right of the defendant. Such is the case of Carter ...

A recent verdict by the grand jury of United States coming on the night of November 24, 2014 stating not to indict the police officer named Darren Wilson was weird enough to trigger a protest which has calmed over a period of time. The case dates back to 9 August, 2014 when a police officer named Darren Wilson fired at least six bullets at an 18 year old teenager named Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri including two to his head. Shockingly the teenager was unarmed and the fact that he was an African American drags the case in the zone of racism. ...