Courtroom College Essays Samples For Students

The courtroom is a place where cases are heard and deliberated as evidence is produced to prove whether the accused person is innocent or guilty. Different courtroom varies depending on the hierarchy and the type of cases, they deliberate upon in the courtroom. In the United States, the courts are closely interlinked through a hierarchical system at either the state or the federal level. Therefore, the court must have jurisdiction before it takes upon a case, deliberate, and come up with a judgment on it. The criminal case is different from the civil cases, especially when it comes to the court layout. In ...

A courtroom is a surrounded room which is open to the public where a judge holds the court to provide a verdict on the accused, if, a law is broken. The various people who work in a court are the Magistrate or Judge, Federal Prosecutor, Defense Counselor, Courtroom Deputy, Courtroom Reporter, Barrister, Solicitor, Registrar, the Witnesses, the Tip staff and so forth. Every person working in the courtroom has a vital role to perform. The paper explains how the various people in the courtroom work independently and their dependencies on the other people to perform the tasks and daily chores of the courtroom. It is ...

- Courtroom observation and interviews
a. Names of the participants:

Presiding judge name: Thomas J. Qummin

Defendant: Gary Burk, charged for selling illegal drugs
Attorney for the defendant: Keeth Colemen
b. Date(s) and time(s) of observation(s); 04/18/2013; 02:30pm
c. Location of observation and type of jurisdiction; Location: Greeley, CO court.
d. Courtroom: 15; Case Number: 12CR2024;
e. Facts and activities observed
During today’s hearing, the courtroom was silent as the defendant or the accused walks into the court room together with his counsel Keeth Colemen. The state prosecutor arrived thereafter. After a few minutes, the ...

Andrew J. Wilhelm in his article “Complex Litigation in the New Era of the iJury” raised very important and urgent problem of modern American court: the effectiveness of jury court system. As it is stated at The Official Website of the Massachusetts Judicial Branch: “jury service is truly “government in the hands of the people”. Even john Adams named the jury as “voice of people”. These two statements reflect the American altitude to the jury system. Americans are proud of their existing possibility to dispense justice.
For its long history the jury court system has proved its effectiveness. But ...

Ensuring that ethical and legal standards exist in the courtroom, allows for integrity of the criminal justice system. Each individual working in a courtroom has responsibilities that ensure justice, fairness, and impartiality exist for all parties. In the courtroom, the judge presides of the proceedings. In this capacity, he must not only follow particulare ethical standards but laws created by the constitution and the courts. Ethically, judges must be impartial and diligent. They are responsible for upholding the integrity and independence of the court. Judges also must adhere to legal and procedural rules that have been established for court ...

The first article analyzed and discussed is Joseph Baker’s “Courts Should Join Information Age; Using Video and other Technology Would Greatly Benefit the American
Justice System”, was originally published in the Orlando Sentinel on December 19, 2004, and is an example of the use of old technology in the American justice system. Baker focuses his intentions of the value of television and the Internet, which has provided the ability to portray events as they happen from anywhere on the planet. It is these forms of media, which have enabled users the ability to see and hear real life ...

Circumstances

Both texts were created by Mahatma Gandhi when India used to be a British colony and Gandhi was leading his country’s march towards independence from colonial rule. Since, India was a British colony; the British Empire ravaged local business and forced them to sell on British made goods. The Dandi March was an effort by Gandhi and fellow Satyagrahis to produce Indian salt as a means to to break the British hegemony over Indian public and Indian industry. The first speech came before the Dandi March in 1930 when Gandhi wanted to make sure that his intentions of ...

Introduction

Threat assessment refers to the process of evaluating risk due to a perceived threat in schools, workplaces, communities and individuals. The risk is based on facts and evidence of behavior in a given situation. Threat assessment was developed by the Secret Service in America to deal with incidences of violence in schools. The main aim of threat assessment is to prevent planned violence. It has three major functions: identification, assessing and managing. In identification, the relevant persons seek to know when, how and where concerns can be reported. Assessment involves gathering and evaluating information from different sources such as the social ...

US vs. Jeremy Smith: My observations

The case of US vs. Jeremy Smith involved the legal framework that is enforced to control drugs and narcotics in the US. The defendant, Jeremy Smith had been arrested by the police in the D.C after suspicion of being in possession of drugs and weapons. The police raided the house of the defendant and found samples of cocaine, marijuana and some guns. According to the US laws, Jeremy was arraigned in court for a trial on 11 th April 2013. The case was set to start at 9.30.
As the norm, the judge had to explain to the jurors ...

1. Discuss Bonneau's findings in What Price Justice?

In "What Price Justice(s)? Understanding Campaign Spending in State Supreme Court Elections," Chris W. Bonneau discusses campaign spending for elections to State Supreme Court, indicating the varying factors that lead to the often wildly different spending budgets for each of these candidates. Depending on the campaign, state supreme court races will often involve a lot of campaign spending, given the circumstances. Bonneau's study is conducted to determine what exactly fuels this campaign spending for these positions.

In his findings, Bonneau determines that "state supreme court campaign spending is driven by ...

Eyewitness has gain support and emphasis in the corridors of justice today. However, it is not wise to rely entirely on their testimonies because at times misidentification is common. Lots of research has been done on this topic which is so controversial based on how reliable human memory is, factors influencing eyewitness at that time of event and possible factors that can distort the eyewitness perspectives.

One factor that has proven to be influencing eyewitness is the task of identifying faces. Difficulties arise from encoding of faces. Some faces are identical and it will be difficult for a person to ...

Executive summary 1

Statement of problem 2
Controlling Authorities 5
Possible Solutions 6
Solution 1 6
Diversity in Expertise 7
Professionalism and Ethics 7
Increased Goodwill 7
Big Costs 7
Option two - hiring an in-house counsel. 8
Minimal costs 8
Accessibility to the documents 8
Shared Ethics and Value 8
Lack of Professionalism in Specific Areas 8
Continual training inadequacy 8
The legal model for XTRA Technologies 9
Conclusion 9

Works Cited 10

Executive summary
The majority of business analysts agree on the idea that legal compliance is ...

Comparison of the movie and book

Agatha Christie wrote the short story Witness for the Prosecution and published in 1948 Mead and Company. Billy Wilder directed a movie by the same title and released it on 17th December 1957 after studying and internalizing the contents of the story.
Leonard Vole is detained for the killing of Emily French, an affluent older widow. Mrs. French had made him a principal heir not knowing that Leonard was a married man and with a family. The fact that Mrs. French him a beneficiary becomes a disgusting factor particularly for his wife, Romaine, and Leonard’s defense become even harder. Things become tough for ...

Introduction

Time has seen radical changes in the court system. Earlier it was all about conviction for a given crime. Victims of addiction were just apprehended, put behind bars where it would do worse to them as they would silently suffer withdrawal (Chrobo, 348). However, this model that describes sovereign power has changed and paved way for disciplinary power, a model characterized by set procedures and curriculum under strict disciplinary measures. The Drug Treatment Courts are one such example.
Drug treatment courts are mandated to deal with persons convicted of non-violent crimes in which the eventuality would be a custodial sentence (Foucalt, ...

Robert Goren Law and Oder Criminal Intent and Carl Rogers Personality Theory

Carl Roger’s is a renowned psychologist that propagated the Personality Theory which explains the behaviors and characteristics of an individual. The argument shows that the formation of a person’ self-concept results from self-actualization behavior. He said that the self-actualizing characteristics determine a person’s personality. The self-actualization tendencies are as a consequence of the events and the environment in which a person grows up in, as well as the person’s genetic make-up. The environment provides the stimulus that prompts responses from the person. A repeat of the stimuli prompts the development of a self-concept. For any individual ...

The Cape Wind project is US’s first offshore wind energy project, that will be located off the coast of Cape Cod, in Nantucket Sound of Massachusetts (Cape Wind). The wind farm consists of 130 wind turbines, each of 3.6-megawatt power generation capacity. The farm’s total capacity is 468 megawatts sufficient to meet 75% of Cape Cod and its nearby island’s power demands (Cape Wind). Each wind turbine will be mounted on transition pieces, and erected on deep dug, monopile foundations in the seabed (Cape Wind). Power generated from the wind turbines will be transmitted to a ...

Abstract

There are hundreds of ways to threaten a person’s safety. Their sources may vary greatly, as well as their outcomes. This paper specializes in a variety of threats to safety and security that exist. It consists of two parts. These two essays are actually two answers to questions given as an assignment. The first part identifies the threat in three areas: accident, disaster and crime. A brief description of every threat, discussion of potential damage and prevention strategies that may be applicable to each threat are included in the essay. The second part is a mock court cause, ...

The movie “A Time to kill” follows the life of a black family in pursuit of justice in a crime perpetrated by members of the Ku Klux Klan (KKK). Set in Mississippi, “A Time to kill” begins with the rape of Tonya, a 10-year-old girl of Black American origin. Her rapists are two white supremacists. Tonya’s father, Carl Lee, seeks legal advice from Jack Brigance, a lawyer of white descent. However, Brigance admits that these rapists would walk free because of a biased selection of the jury. Carl goes to the courthouse and kills both rapists as a ...

Competence can have different meanings. For example, according to Bursztajn & Brodsky, competence of a defendant is associated with his/her ability to perform a task. A person is presumed competent if there is no mental condition which can influence her/his understanding of consequences of some behavior and actions. At the same time, insanity (criminal responsibility), according to Bursztajn & Brodsky, is associated with some mental illness of defendant. On the basis of the presence of a mental condition a defendant can be excused for his/her misconduct (Bursztajn& Brodsky,1996).
Main questions which must be addressed when discussing competence of a defendant ...

I am a Man

The title of the book written by Joe Starita, entitled I am a man, was inspired by the own words uttered by the main character of the book who is recognized as a hero without any superpowers. “I am a Man” is the great story of the Ponca Indian tribe Chief Standing Bear who longs for home and justice for his people that took place in 1877. The book narrated a brilliant history of the west that is somehow similar to the tragic event known as the “Trail of Tears” when the Cherokee nation were ...

Question 1

Technically, a lexicographer is a person who writes compiles and edits dictionaries. According to a comprehensive dictionary of English language, lexicographer is "a harmless drudge who compiles lists of words." (Kaye 129). Therefore, the creators of the Urban Dictionary qualifies to be called the lexicographers. The creators or the authors of this dictionary are required to provide the correct spelling of the word they are creating, example sentence and its definition. With this light, the creators must make appropriate decisions regarding the authentic or proper form of language. Consequently, these self-appointed creators both standardize and record the language used ...

Part 1

Court
Southern District of Florida
Wikie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States

11-CV-22122 Lawrence V. MS & RE Kesef Corporation

Defendant
MS & RE Kesef Corp.
Plaintiff
Duke Lawrence
Mediator
Martin A. Soll
Judge
Patricia Seitz
Charges
Violation of Fair Labor Standards
Non-payment of minimum wage to the employee
Refusal to pay overtime payment
Retaliation against plaintiff
Forced to avoid legal proceedings
Brief Overview of case
Part 2
Trial Project
I have chosen the trial of Lawrence v. MS & RE Kesef Corp. for observation. The case was brought for trial on July 9, 2012. The case was presented in the court of Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse. ...

[Class Title]

Introduction
Bob Ewell is one of the major character in Harper Lee’s classic novel, To Kill a Mocking Bird. This paper would like to analyze the character of Bob Ewell and how he was portrayed in the novel. The Ewells were, evidently, a dysfunctional family. Bob Ewell, for instance, was a known drunk, but because he and his daughter are White while the accused was a black man, the predominantly white society of the fictional Maycomb County in Alabama became overly biased towards the case. The accused has already lost the battle of public opinion based ...

If we rely on the principles of equity and equality during the proceedings, we will without any doubt conclude that such features of any person as race, skin, nationality, age cannot be the basis for one’s assessment of his personality, especially when the judgment mainly depends on this verdict. Notwithstanding, different researches have proven the opposite state of affairs. For example, Chiricos and Crawford (Wang, 2008) after analyzing 38 different cases “claimed that blacks are more likely to be sentenced to prison than whites”; Spohn (p. 15) concluded that “racial minorities were sentenced more harshly than whites, if ...

Introduction

Concept of Due Process and Its Protection in Pre-Trial and Trial Stages of Criminal Procedure
Hence, due process may be conceptualized as a legal procedure which courts and other authorities are obliged to comply with to ensure a “fundamental fairness” to a defendant (Del Carmen, 2014; JUSTIA US Law, n.d.). Moreover, due process embodies “substantive” and “procedural” due process. The latter type pertains to both civil and criminal proceedings which virtually differ dramatically, given the rights granted to defendants in both proceedings and their actual application (Del Carmen, 2014).
Extending the subject matter regarding the difference between the application ...

Culture Competency

What demands have been served by “othering” people of color from certain ethnic groups, Middle East and Muslims, and other marginalized groups throughout U.S. history?
The concept of “othering” was hooked on the premise of categorizing people according to their designated group, and unfortunately, this practice had often resulted to certain groups labeled as inferior or superior than the others. In the case of the American society, categorization allowed the white race, who controls the greater political power, to show superiority over the other race. It is the mantra of this type of sociological order that the dominant ...

Impacts of Society Response to Crime on Criminal Justice Processes

Impacts of Society Response to Crime on Criminal Justice Processes
The criminal justice system is a societal construction that is reactive to social structure and changes. Society’s view of crime has changed over time. Society’s attitude towards acts of crime changes due to developments. For instance, an increase in the number of immigrants into a community introduces new cultures and perspectives that may bring about changes in criminal justice systems (Smith, 2010). Responses by society such as holding protests, boycotts, and riots impact public policing, sentencing practices and correctional operations in various ways.
The American society in ...

How important is setting to the central theme of the story? Explain using at least three different examples from the novel to support your thesis.
‘A Lesson Before Dying’ demonstrates that life for the black man in a small and nondescript Deep South town is fraught with danger and lacks opportunity. The setting in the story is very important as it assists us to feel the situation as if we are part of the settings and the actual surroundings. Blacks are kept ‘in their place’ in this town according to Gaine’s evocative descriptions especially the manner in which ...

This 1997 film was based on the true story of the slave ship Amistad that was captured off the cost of Cuba in 1839 after a rebellion by the Africans, who attempted to sail it back home. Instead, they were tricked by the surviving Spanish crew members and the ship ended up being captured off the coast of New York. After a lengthy legal battle that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court, the fifty-four slaves were freed and returned to Africa in 1842. Since the U.S. had banned the slave trade in 1808, even though it continued covertly, ...

Race-based jury nullification occurs all over the United States. There are plenty of famous examples to support this claim. However, in a country that prides itself on bringing criminals to justice, there is little room for prejudice in the courtroom.

Jury nullification is when a jury considers the defendant to be guilty but, for reasons known to them, chooses to declare him not-guilty. Jury nullification happens when a jury negates to convict a defendant in spite of evidence of guilt for the reason that the jurors deem the law to be unfair or as being unfairly directed. Race-based jury nullification describes the incidence ...