Judges College Essays Samples For Students

The following analysis represents the sample data of the judges of Hamilton County and the probability of the cases at three different court levels regarding appeals and reversals.

Introduction:

There are over thousand cases that the judges of Hamilton Country need to deal with. The study for analysis of performance has been undertaken to provide evidence to the media whether the judges are performing fairly well or not. The results of the analysis have been obtained from Kristen DelGuzzi, who belonged to Cinncinati Enquirer; the organization responsible for the conduction of the case study taking three years as a time ...

Introduction

Democracy in the United States was meant to give power to the people by creating a separation of powers into three main arms of government. The reason was to create a governance structure in which no single individual or institution of government will override its power and erode the civil liberties of individual Americans. The American democracy was seen as an improvement over the monarchy in Britain and the colonial government the people had experienced. One of the elements of American democracy was the establishment of an independent Supreme Court (head of the Judiciary) that has to be led by independent ...

Rule and Approaches used by Judges when Interpreting an Act of Parliament

The statutory interpretation might be necessary in the case of complexity and when uncertainty concerning the Acts made by Parliament is required. The complexities that might occur as a result of an Act of Parliament include the "what section provides" and "within the provision" complexities. As a result of these complexities, the judges are called upon to interpret the Acts of Parliament before becoming laws to clear the mischief concerning such acts of parliament. When the judges interpret the acts of parliament, it makes the public have trust in such enacted laws. There are several instances that might be ...

Introduction

Alternative sentencing makes way for committers of minor crimes and those with no criminal records to transform and comply with varied ethical standards as laid out by the state. With enhanced supervision as an alternative to incarceration, court administrators are involved in monitoring activities such as substance abuse treatment, random drug testing and community services performed by the offenders. The probation officers have to work closely with the Office of Community Corrections to ensure that the benchmarks set by the judges are met and that the offenders are able to contribute to long term growth and stability of the ...

Introduction

There are several sources of law available in the legal practice, while the role of the judicial precedents is the most important one in the common law systems as the United Kingdom. In fact, all legal systems attempt to follow previously accepted judicial opinions as judicial precedents for creation the similar pattern around the dispute or particular case. In terms of the legal framework existing in the United Kingdom, the notion and nature of the judicial precedent should be considered as this particular jurisdiction is familiar with the doctrine of the binding precedent as the source of law and ...

Essay in English Law Whether it is Unfair for Criminal Justice Insiders to Sit On Jury

Most likely, it is unfair for someone who works in the criminal justice system to be chosen to participate as jury selection-members, in the British legal system. Prior to the time of the Global Recession of 2008, one report discussed several aspects of the UK-defined protocol of what a jury-system process entails. Commentary was made regarding the UK jury system historical roots, trial-jury size, secrecy, independence, and selection (“Jury Service – Crown Prosecution”). One set of erudite Australian Professors noted that the advent of social media had fundamentally caused problems, especially during trials (Wallace et al. 2011). Consider, however, the ...

The justice system recognizes several procedures based on which the judgment can be delivered. Among all, the jury trial serves the role of the significant instrument for the consideration of the merits of the case and the delivering the opinion of the public over the particular matter. In this regard, the jury trial should be understood as the trial proceedings within which the jury is responsible for the examination of the facts presented in the case and decide over its effect on the possible order. According to the UK legislation, the jury is usually compound of 12 persons, which ...

Q. 1
One of the advantages of this case-management system is that it helps in ensuring uniformity and consistency in the manner in which individual cases are disposed of by the courts. The hybrid case management system also makes it easier to effectively and efficiently manage the court staff. Moreover, the case management approach ensures better service to those seeking legal services or filing complaints in courts. It makes the court system or station to be more organized and hence reducing the backlog of cases if properly managed. Further, this case management approach is less costly as it saves ...

1) For low-risk offenders who pose minimal threat to public safety, there should be some sort of middle ground between imposing no punishment and imprisonment. Incarcerating all nonviolent offenders for minor crimes and offenses is simply not sustainable policy. The use of intermediate sanctions has gained popularity among the states as prison overcrowding continues to rise. Intermediate sanctions provide for great flexibility in tailoring the sanction to either be more lenient or severe based on the particular crime. All fifty states offer the intermediate sanction of house arrest as an alternative to prison (Tonry, 1997, p. 10).
2) The ...

(Author’s Full Name)

A Personal Opinion
In the United States, local government plays a vital role in the development of counties, municipalities, and districts. These governments work below the state level and usually serve as the “middleman” between the state government and the local residents. Besides the all- purpose local governments, there may be unique purpose local governments which serve a number of purposes; such as maintaining the sewerage system across a municipality or township, overseeing public transportation, establishing districts for fire protection and engaging in other public works. In Texas District 9, the local government manages district ...

Abstract

Puerto Rico is a small island that is part of an archipelago located somewhere out in the Caribbean Sea. It has an approximate population of about 3.5 million people and has a small area of about 9,104 square kilometers. The population is largely Hispanic where Spanish and English are the languages that have been set aside for official use.
Fridolin (2000) says that the most ideal court system in terms of ideals would definitely be that of Switzerland as it is considered the most transparent court system in the world. It boasts of absence of external interference and ...

The Supreme Court of the United States has frequently participated in the concepts of judicial activism and judicial restraint. Many courts have been known to be either strictly activist or strictly restraint. However, recent history shows that nine justices in a single term can use activism in one case and restraint in another. Judicial restraint occurs when the justices rely more heavily on past case law and legal interpretations already presented when making decisions. While judicial activism occurs when justices go beyond interpretations and lean more toward personal preferences and current political trends in rendering decisions. Predicting which theory ...

The legislation is a vital as well as inherent part of the judicial responsibility which helps to balance power representing constituencies and making laws. The bill, however, raises a broader implication emerging with the principles of universal laws. Abdication of judicial responsibility for judges might conflict with the ideas of the rule of law and the separation of power given the fact that this grossly understates the impact of legislation as well as overemphasizes the contrasts along with boundaries between legislation and common law at the expense of their mutual influence, continuities, and similarities. This reflects the way in ...

Psychology of Sport: Boxing

Introduction: Sports Psychology and Boxing
The psychology behind a sport is generally determined by the cumulative psychological impacts derived from the different aspects of the sport like the behavior of fans, a perceptive bias of adjudication in judging the sport, and morality of the players and in its fundamental. Boxing, as a sport, has been extremely controversial in terms of morality issues, biased judging based results, and violent response from the fans with respect to the issue of bad judgment and morality. This essay aims at reflecting the psychological theories of applicable to the above-stated aspects of Boxing as ...

English

Abstract
In our essay, we analyze two articles that give us two different perspectives on the methods of Judicial Selection. Articles provide us with two opposite methods. The first one describes positive sides and changes that can provide elected judiciary. It gives evidence of improvements, such as the end of raising money from lawyers and litigant, and shows that merit is an important part that was substituted. The second article gives us information about Partisan Election method as the best method of Judicial Selection. In our essay, we summarize and analyze both articles. We describe different methods of selections ...

The judicial activism is defined as a philosophy of judicial decision making where by judges allow their personal views about public policy, guiding their decisions among other factors . Judicial activism can be observed in three possible actions: overturning a law as unconstitutional, overturning judicial precedent, and ruling against a preferred interpretation of the constitution. The use of judicial activism as a term usually implies that the person does not like the ruling as for example in the dissent of same sex marriage.
The use of judicial activism takes away the powers of the other branches of government. For example ...

The Dallas County Commissioners Court serves as both the legislative and executive authority for Dallas County. The court is comprised of four members, namely four commissioners and a county judge. The four commissioners each represent one of the four county districts and are chosen separated by the voters of each district. The county judge is chosen by the voter of the full county and serves as the head of the Commissioners Court. Unlike in other parts of the state, the Dallas County Commissioners Court does not exercise any judicial powers. As a sub-state institute, the Court can only exercise the specific ...

The case in question represents Abigail Fisher, a white female who was denied admission at the University of Texas since she failed to qualify for the Texas Top Ten Percent Plan. She argued that the university considered many factors to fill the remaining slots including race, which was against the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment. The district court, court of appeals and Supreme Court held that the university's admissions process was constitutional (Liptak, 2016). Some judges including Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Chief Justice John Roberts voiced their dissent regarding the ruling.
The attorneys, in this case, ...

The Courts’ Discretion under Section 25 Of The Matrimonial Causes Act

Introduction
The Matrimonial Causes Act empowers Courts to make a wide range of orders pertaining financial provision related to divorce proceedings. One of the most instrumental segments that make this possible is Section 25 of the Act. This paper intends to evaluate the stipulations of the section thoroughly and make a critical evaluation of whether the provision gives room for Judicial discretion which is unfettered. The paper will seek to account for the discretion given to Courts by dint of this Section in light of decided cases and commentary that has been made on the same by highly qualified ...

Judicial activism versus judicial restraint is one of the debates that has influenced American jurisprudence for many years. The reason for this is that it is very easy for any human’s mind to be clouded by their personal beliefs. In fact, in many professions, professional struggle with the ability to do what is right for their job versus what may be their moral principles or personal beliefs. It is based on this framework that the debate between judicial activism and judicial restraint originates. Judicial activism refers to the judicial rulings that are decided upon the judge’s political ...

The use of biometric evidence in executing criminal justice has gained reputation throughout the world as a result of rapid advancement in technology. In essence, biometric recognition entails the use of biometric equipment to recognize individuals through their biological characteristics (Sanders et al., 2010). Bio information of a person is captured and analyzed for use in identification. Some examples of bio information include fingerprint and signatures. A biometric evidence is the most popular and convincing method of confirming the identity of a person (Reedman, 2015). The criminal justice system uses different biometric characteristics to identify criminals depending on the ...

Role of Sentencing Philosophies

Sentencing philosophies have evolved over time. As these philosophies have evolved, so have correctional practices to accommodate the various types of punishment imposed upon those convicted of criminal offenses.
Indeterminate sentencing started losing favor in 1970s for a number of reasons. Indeterminate sentencing allowed parole officers and judges to be too lenient in the way they handle convicted criminals at the expense of the safety of the public. When violent offenders receive lenient treatments, the public is more likely to be infuriated since these criminals are prone to commit more heinous crimes. Additionally, indeterminate sentencing allows for the application ...

Section 1

I live in the state of Texas and I have come to understand the way the local government operates. Just like all the other states in the US, Texas has its own constitution, which defines the various legal aspects of daily life among its citizens. The state of Texas has established and fully functional governments at the county and municipal levels. Five commissioners; four of whom are elected from single-member districts and a county judge who is elected at-large, run the county governments. The county governments provide public safety and manage the jails where lawbreakers are housed for rehabilitation. ...

Summary of the Administrative Issue

In this article, Chand, Schreckhise and Bowers (2016) examine the factors that influence the decisions of Federal Immigration Judges when granting or refusing asylum to immigrants in various regions. According to them, politics and political affiliations to a great extent influence the granting of asylum by these judges. This is consistent with a similar observation by Post (2013) who notes that politics obviously has a hand in such decisions but questions the efficacy of this in ensuring fair outcomes. For, immigration judges in areas under the control of Republicans rarely give asylum to immigrants while those in regions dominated ...

Abstract

This paper examines the criminal justice system of the United States and how it operates. It commences with the review of the judicial system of America and proceeds to examine government policies and how they have been utilized to deal with crime in America. Evidence shows that there is a challenge of defining an objective system of criminal justice in America because America’s bill of rights ensures that juries are utilized. This opens up the floodgate for various inefficiencies that compromises on defining the true elements of cases
A review of the OJ Simpson case shows that the ...

International Systems of Justice

International Systems of Justice
The United States is a common law system, which originates from old English common law. What is unique about the common law is that the law is not codified in statutes or written material, but rather the law is made through judicial decisions (Cohen, 1989, p. 15). In a common law system, there are no comprehensive legal codes, rules, or statutes (The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, p. 1). As case law develops over time, judicial precedent shapes the law (The Common Law and Civil Law Traditions, p. 1). In a common law system, ...

What is the background information provided by the author?

The current environmental regulatory regime led to widespread dissatisfaction. This is because the centralized command-and-control environmental regulation does not offer a reliable method for determining the optimal amount of pollution or finding the most efficient means of achieving the desired pollution level. This has resulted in various reform proposals and policy changes to increase environmental quality. One of the proposed reforms includes abandoning most of federal environmental regulation and returning to the common law environmentalism. This proposal has however received harsh criticism from most stakeholders in the environment sector who believe that the failure of state common law is ...

Response to Walter Rumans

As Walter clearly brings out in his comment on comparative judicial systems, there are three major legal or criminal justice systems depending on whether it is civil or common law jurisdiction. These are the adversarial system mainly found in common law countries, the inquisitorial system commonly found in civil law jurisdictions and the popular or mixed system that combines aspects of the latter two. These different legal cultures indicate how our various justice systems work and operate differently. As pointed out, the adversarial system is the most shared and familiar one in which two parties to a legal dispute ...

(Professor/Instructor)
(Course/Major)
(Institute/University)

Introduction

Thesis Statement: Kantian ethics, as a utilitarian view, holds that man is the end of the act to be benefitted from instead of the means to achieve the goal.
One of the most denigrating crimes known to man, the trade in people is a crime that impacts the global community. Traffickers trick men, women, and children from almost every country and then “sell” them to traders looking to exploit their situation. Though the most prevalent form of human trafficking is for the illicit sex trade, others are sold into slavery, and even at times into syndicates ...

In the 4th Century BC, Aristotle clearly stated that for a government to have an effective constitution, it must have in place three basic elements. These are a public assembly, various officers of the state and lastly a judicial department. One of the most famous quotes of John Adams is ‘power must never be trusted without a check’. This may be said to mean that in instances that an individual or an institution which is tasked with the authority to rule over a people should never be given the absolute authority to have the absolute authority. Institutions checking on ...

Introduction

Tribal courts are a common phenomenon among American Indians/Native Americans. Their existence has been shaped and aligned along the Anglo-styled justice system that is dominant in the United States of America. There is a need to learn and understand the development of the tribal courts as relates to the American Indian approach. For instance, it is worth-noting that there exist several similarities between the 19th and 20th century American Indian experiences. The introduction of the Anglo-styled system of justice also means that the system to be used should be balanced. Whereas the tribal courts represent the past, the Anglo-styled ...

Introduction

In the American legal system, the rights afforded to a defendant who has been accused of a crime are fundamental and of paramount constitutional concern. The Framers were cognizant of the potential for government abuse and ensured that a criminal defendant’s rights were protected. The Sixth Amendment provides that in criminal proceedings, “the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury” (U.S. Const. amend. VI). Thus, the Sixth Amendment safeguards the criminal defendant’s right to a speedy trial and guarantees that defendant is entitled to a trial by a jury ...

Abstract

This paper seeks to compare American and Australian Criminal Justice Systems by providing information regarding the way the two criminal justice systems operate. Some of the various aspects that the paper will be seeking to evaluate within the two systems include the legal traditions; law enforcement; measure of crime; criminal procedure; corrections; terrorism and organized crime; courts and legal profession; and juvenile Justice. The paper starts with an introduction, which provides a general overview of the paper. Consequently, the paper will provide insight regarding the legal traditions that are practiced within the two countries.

Introduction

Comparative studies of criminal justice ...

Despite the redistributive powers granted to courts in matters related to divorce, there is a limited statutory regime that offers adequate governance of financial consequences on cases. Therefore, the majority agrees that the current form of constructive trust in family affairs remains unsatisfactory. In this regard, the constructive trust in family law is associated with risk of injustice posed by the litigants. Tension between legal objectives arises when the courts attempt to combine various principles of law to provide justice. Also, a huge amount of legal waste is generated when judicial manipulation is applied to ensure fairness in justice ...

Unlikely Heroes

The Fearful Man Named Gideon (Judges 6,7)
When Israel nation were persecuted my Midianites for 7 years, Jews had reminded that if they turn back to God, that he will save them. And God did. He sends his angel with the words to the man whose name was Gideon. The world “fearful” can have several meanings in this text. Firstly, we can see the hero who was afraid of God and because of that he did, everything that God told him to do. And on the other hand we can see the man who was afraid to do ...

I. Introduction
Under the Sixth Amendment, one of the fundamental rights that a person accused of a crime holds is the right to a “public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district” where the crime was committed. Subsequent Supreme Court jurisprudence has interpreted the Sixth Amendment’s impartial jury provision to mean a jury composed of unbiased individuals in regards to how the perceive the defendant. While an important of consideration as to whether a juror is biased has focused on issues of race, ethnicity, gender, and national origin. An equally important consideration is whether a ...

The American court system is one of complex court systems across the world. Approximately, 17000 courts operate within the US at local, state and federal levels . The structure of these courts, including the legal duties of the court staff followed by the steps involved in the criminal process have been influencing the trends of American court system over years. There were several controversies and debates about the actions and inactions of the courts in the past. However, the court system has transformed over time into an effective judicial body, which delivers justice to the Americans. The past trends of ...

Response to Post No. 1

Although negotiating is a very important aspect of a lawyer’s function in the same way that litigating, representing, and counseling are, I think that drafting of documents is the most important task that a lawyer does – if I were asked to make a choice. Although negotiating has become a common function of a lawyer in plea bargaining (Neubauer and Meinhold 134), which is becoming a trend in the United States criminal judicial system, most negotiations in this area are dominated by prosecutors and I would think all a defense counsel can do is either advise his client to accept or not to accept an offer from ...

Introduction

Police power is considered as the government’s duty to develop and implement policies and legislations that are intended to benefit the public. Further, these laws are implemented, generally by law enforcers who makes it their responsibility to ensure that these laws are obeyed. Some of the duties of the police officers include the preservation of peace and order, detection and prevention of crime, and ensuring the fair and efficient administration of the law (U.S., 2003). As a means to give them the authority to uphold and administer these policies, there are laws which are developed to provide the ...

Court consolidation

One of the actions a court administrator needs to takes is a conducting a review of all services that are offered by the courts to check that there is no duplication of services. Despite the fact that such an action may result in loss of jobs, it will lead to saving a lot of taxpayers’ money by eliminating jobs that are not necessary for the court system. As such, aspects of jobs that need to be evaluated are the number of receptionists available for use in the courts. The number can be reduced as receptionist workload does not require ...

For a country to run smoothly the issues emanating from the congress, parties and state authorities should go hand in hand in making sure the constitution is followed to the later. This paper addresses issues to do with congressional ethics, third party candidates and their impact on the overall governing rule.it will also look at the role of Federal and State authority in the education sector.

Congressional Ethics

Roy Moore, Alabama’s idealistic chief justice, is a member of Congress who faced elimination from the bench, for being indicted on six counts of violating judicial ethics. Moore’s order monitored a ...

There are various differences between the examined countries in the area of the court system. The first most visible derives from the sole political system of the country and the division of power. The structural independence of courts and judiciary exists in both countries. The differences in the two countries court system can be found in the fact that the United States Supreme Court does and Iran’s Supreme Court does not “make” a law. Iran operates under the Code without an accepted principle of judicial review with the procedures set by the law. The Supreme Court decisions in ...

Introduction

Diversion programs are put in place as an alternative to incarceration for juvenile offenders. The idea behind diversion programs is that sentencing a child to incarceration for their crimes is only harming the child and that programs designed to deflect bad behavior are a better option for young people that become mixed up in criminal activities. Diversion programs are intended to be used on young people that did not commit serious offenses. The design is supposed to focus on attempting to find punishments that are not going to be serious if the crime that was committed was not serious. ...

European Union

The European Union is an international organization of an economic policy that brings together the state for the wider social inclusion. Since July 2013 it brought together 28 member states. The EU has developed a proprietary management system, based on a specialized authority, separate from the administration in the Member States. Referring to Christopher Hill and Michael Smith “The EU and its member states are important actors on the international development scene. Together they provide more than half of official development assistance (ODA) and two-thirds of global humanitarian aid.”(Hill and Smith, 2005)
Compering to other governmental institutions European ...

The administration of criminal justice involves various players and institutions such as the police, court judges, police chiefs and prison officers coming into contact with members of the society most of the time. The manner in which these groups of people conduct themselves or behave while handling the public to a great extent preserves and boosts the general confidence in the administration of justice system. Therefore, any unethical or unprofessional behavior by those charged with the administration of justice undermines and erodes this confidence. More often than not, however, the police, for instance, have been cited for misconduct and ...

Foremost, in the views of the Federalists, the only means through which the Constitution could maintain the partition of powers into the executive, legislative, and judiciary departments was through instructions incorporated into the structure of government. Accordingly, as Madison explains in Federalist #51, the Constitution gives each department “a will of its own” by ensuring that factors such as appointments are devoid of the other two’s influence. However, the new government gives more power to the “fountain of authority,” the citizens. By that logic, in the strictest sense, the people reserve the right to select the Head of ...

Is this a task best handled by the courts?

The task of deciding whether the laws enacted by the government are consistent with the rules in the constitution is best handled by the courts. The nature of the court system in the United States allows those sitting judges, especially in higher offices, to make decisions that are outside the bounds of party politics (Marbury V. Madison 137). This allows the decisions to remain within the framework of the law.

Would your answer be different depending on whether the judges in such courts were elected or appointed for life?

If judges were elected then they would not function as well in this role. This is because they would then be given the incentive to make decisions that will ...

There were a great number of grievances that the Founding Fathers had with The King of England, and these grievances were what led to The Colonies declaring independence from the crown. Not all of these grievances are equal, and some are more significant than others are. Of these grievances, the three most grievous were making judges dependent on his will, maintaining a military force against The Colonies and cutting off fair trade. The three least grievous were taxation without consent, taking citizens of The Colonies captive on the seas and preventing immigration to The Colonies by people from other ...

Incarceration appears to be one of the most popular forms of punishment for committing crime or other offences. The largest number of prison population is in the United States. According to a study, performed in 2013 by Lauren E. Glaze and Danielle Kaeble, statisticians by the U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), about two million adults were incarcerated and others less than five million were under parole or probation. Totally 6 899 000 adult individuals were under the supervision of Criminal Justice System (prisons, jails, parole, probation) in 2013. (Glaze, L., Kaeble, D., 2013)
With the establishment of prisons, ...

Identify the three branches of Texas government and describe their functions.

Texas was admitted as the 28th State back on 29 December 1845. This was nine years after its secession from Mexico in 1836. The current constitution of Texas was adopted in the year 1876 (“Texas State Government at a Glance, n.d.”).
As a result, the Texas’ government operates under its Constitution, which comprises a type of unitary democracy for its state government, one that uses the Dillon Rule in addition to governments both at the municipal and county levels (“Abbott, n.d.”). The Constitution of Texas divides the power of state movement into three specific departments namely the legislative, executive ...

Israel has never been a liberal state. This country was built by true communists– so convinced that they emigrated from the socialist Soviet Union, and created even more socialist kibbutzim. The kibbutzim embodied communism ideals much better than Soviet collective farms: the property passed into the ownership of the community, people’s incomes were combined into a common pot, and children were often brought up by a commune more than by their own parents.
There is no freedom of speech in Israel. It has a military censorship; however, the greatest obstacle to the freedom of expression is the Israeli ...

The first article analyzed and discussed is Joseph Baker’s “Courts Should Join Information Age; Using Video and other Technology Would Greatly Benefit the American
Justice System”, was originally published in the Orlando Sentinel on December 19, 2004, and is an example of the use of old technology in the American justice system. Baker focuses his intentions of the value of television and the Internet, which has provided the ability to portray events as they happen from anywhere on the planet. It is these forms of media, which have enabled users the ability to see and hear real life ...

Introduction

The United States Constitution can be described as the highest law of the land. During court proceedings, the constitution is the supreme law that is applicable in determining the outcome of criminal litigation, but other laws arise from the Amendments to the Constitution. The United States Constitution often guides how the government should function, the jurisdiction of the presidency, American Congress, and the Supreme Court. It is, however, paramount to note that all American states have their own Constitutions that they enact and follow, but the federal constitution is considered the highest law that overrides other state laws in ...

US Supreme Court

The US Supreme Court is the highest court in the federal State of America. The court’s mission is to arbitrate and interpret the law in all constitutional and legal matters arising in the country and also to guide in the implementation of the supreme law of the country (Hansford, Thomas & Spriggs 2). In the criminal justice system, the organization is supposed to interpret laws pertaining to criminal law and apply the spirit and requirements of justice so as to achieve justice. The organization is headed by the office of the chief justice; the current officeholder is John G. ...

1. Marbury v. Madison
Marbury v. Madison was a significant case in the history of the United States. It was an important case because the Supreme Court affirmed its position as the only state organ charged with the responsibility of reviewing decisions made by the executive and the judiciary. The judgement was delivered by Chief Justice John Marshal in 1803.The case had a vital role in ensuring that the Judiciary was a respected arm of government, just as the legislature and the executive.
William Marbury was voted and declared as the peace justice of the country’s capital at ...

Golub, Mark. "Plessy as "Passing": Judicial Responses to Ambiguously Raced Bodies in Plessy v. Ferguson." Law & Society Review, 39, no. 3 (2005): 563-600.

Synopsis

Homer Plessy’s decision to purchase a ticket as a white man, and to later confess that he is indeed black, was part of “a test case” conducted by the Creole community of New Orleans. As per the terms of the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890, Caucasians and persons of African descent were subject to traveling in different railway cars to serve the purposes of racial segregation. In the article, Golub quotes Plessy’ ...

Abstract

The twenty first century has witnessed impressive advances in science and medicine, resulting in increased life expectancy. Unfortunately there has also been a dramatic increase in degenerative diseases such as diabetes and cancer. These development have brought the issue of euthanasia to center stage. The following essay attempts a careful examination of the issue, looking at the arguments opponents and supporters have put forward. Among the issues examined is the right to choose how one dies in accordance with the principles of autonomy and beneficence. It is argued that the practice of euthanasia only benefits the very few individuals ...

INTRODUCTION

Ethical violations occur in every business field, and the criminal justice system in no different. News reports are not scant concerning individuals in law enforcement, corrections and the courts who have violated ethical codes. Ethical codes exist in the criminal justice field to not only protect the official, but also to protect the public. When an individual in the field of criminal justice violates an ethical code, typically, many people are affected, and it does not matter if the violation was intentional or unintentional, or real or simply alleged.

FACTS

Judge John P. Contini, a judge in Broward County Florida, ...

<Institution>

Introduction

Neoliberalism is both an economic and political ideology which proposes a new way in which states are restricted from interfering with the economic affairs and general day to day dealings of their private citizens. This concept was developed by Adam Smith in 1770 when he posited that government should not be allowed to be involved in the economy of the country and initially it was called liberalism. This stance borrowed heavily from the laissez faire principle which required that traders should be let free to negotiate their own terms of engagement. Adam’s conception was challenged in ...

Introduction

Parliamentary sovereignty is a system of governance, which denotes that Parliament is the supreme legal authority with the sole capacity to make or end any law. The relationship between Parliament and other arms of government go as far as they do not interfere with or overrule legislations passed by Parliament. The concept of supreme Parliament was discussed by the AV Dicey in his 19th-century book “The Law of the Constitution (1885, p. 39-40).” In his view, Dicey believed that Parliament has unlimited power under the English constitution to make or unmake law in whichever way it deem fit and ...