Essays on Common Law

Assignment # 1

The most appropriate charges for Mason and Wooster are imprisonment. Imprisonment would work for them since they are young people whose behavior is easy to mend by instilling fear in them by jailing them and introducing them to the other hardcore criminals for their behavior to be streamlined. The involvement of the hardcore criminals would be to the threaten Mason and Wooster as molestation is common in jails. The code section that applies here is theft under chapter 15. It is most applicable as they would acquire the products would harm the owners business wise. The common law applicable

Continue reading...

The greatest challenge facing law enforcement agencies in investigating the exploitation, cyber stalking, and obscenity is the interconnected nature of technology that forms the internet, making it a global problem. It implies that various cyber crimes have spread to an extent beyond the control of these enforcement agencies. The regional agreement like the Europe convention on cyber crime has thus failed to keep pace with the rapid technological advancements hence leading to their imperfection (Clough, 2012).
The conventions in the form of regional agreements are also not a model law as others argue it out. However, they are just

Continue reading...

Introduction

The law of contracts is largely based on three set areas of law. The most ancient of these, and arguably the founding principles are based on common law. The second and the more specific governing laws are found on statutory provisions which may be different from one jurisdiction to another. The third area of law that offers substantial amount of fairness in the United States is the Uniform Commercial Code. Finally, with global commercial transactions becoming a key determinant on the general global economy, there are the more general laws of contact put forward by the United Nations called

Continue reading...

Introduction

Known as precedent or case law; judges developed common law through their tribunal decisions. Practically, common law systems are legal systems that render more weight to common laws based on the fact that it is fair enough to deal with similar incidents in the same way. Common law applies mostly within the jurisdiction. Judges write down their viewpoints about different cases that bind lower courts in that jurisdiction to create common law. Property, torts and contracts are the basic foundation of the common law.
Generally, common law is defined as a legal system created by the decisions previously made

Continue reading...

Introduction

Erie Railroad v Tompkins was a fairly simple case in which the Supreme Court was called upon to give an interpretation as to the application of state common law over federal common law in cases of diversity jurisdiction. In addition, the case is celebrated for its empowerment of the state common law as it clearly denied Congress the power to set federal common law, an action it perceived as unconstitutional.

Federal Court’s obligation to state court decisions prior to Erie Railroad v Tompkins

Before the decision in Erie, federal courts enjoyed the discretion as to whether to follow decisions from the state courts or not. Despite issues falling under diversity jurisdiction necessitating

Continue reading...

William the Conqueror (about 1027-87) – was the King of England from 1066, of the Norman dynasty`s origin. From 1035 – was the Duke of Normandy. Having strengthened the ducal power in Normandy, he managed to create a strong, well-trained army of heavy knights and infantry (about 10 thousand people). In 1066 he landed in England and defeated the Anglo-Saxons army of King Harold II at Hastings – “William's path to the throne was clear” (“William the Conqueror. Biography”). Accession to the throne of William the Conqueror marked the beginning of a constructive period in the history of England. The accession

Continue reading...

English Law

Introduction

Every country in the world develops its own legal system. There are no identical legal systems. This applies even in countries that are very close nationally, economically, geographically, and even socially. There are Western legal systems, systems of Asian legal systems of the people of Africa among others. By meaning in the history of legal systems, we have to distinguish continental and Anglo-Saxon system. The Anglo-Saxon system developed independently without significant influence Roman law. The Anglo-Saxon system first developed in England and thereafter spread in English-speaking countries. The Anglo-Saxon legal system, unlike continental, was not insisting on the

Continue reading...

Introduction

Erie Railroad v Tompkins was a fairly simple case in which the Supreme Court was called upon to give an interpretation as to the application of state common law over federal common law in cases of diversity jurisdiction. In addition, the case is celebrated for its empowerment of the state common law as it clearly denied Congress the power to set federal common law, an action it perceived as unconstitutional.

Federal Court’s obligation to state court decisions prior to Erie Railroad v Tompkins

Before the decision in Erie, federal courts enjoyed the discretion as to whether to follow decisions from the state courts or not. Despite issues falling under diversity jurisdiction necessitating

Continue reading...

English Law

 In the construction of legal system science is used as the basic material of general legal norms , as they are a source of law . Existing general legal norms are grouped with each other in a narrow group of norms governing the relations of the high degree of similarity. These groups are called norms of the institution or institutions . Institutions are the first level of connectivity of legal rules , but not the only one. The next level of connectivity is based on grouping of legal norms that regulate broader legal issues , ie . legal relations lesser degree of similarity , but similar

Continue reading...

Australian vs. US Legal Systems

Australia is a commonwealth nation and follows the common law legal system. The Australian legal system is based on the protection of common held beliefs and values of the community in addition to upholding the democratic principles. Over time, the Australian legal system has developed in many aspects that include customs, rules, common law, and customary law among others. The Commonwealth of Australia is ruled under a federated constitutional monarchy whereby powers are divided among the territories, states, and the federal government (Marcus, and Waye, 2010). With the strong common law legal system, the aspect of separation of powers

Continue reading...