Essays on Contract

Business Law

Karla should be liable for Leroy’s extra expenses in providing for the hogs. Karla breached a written contract with Leroy after failing to transfer the ownership of the land before the date they had contracted or rather agreed upon (May 1). Essentially, the delayed transfer of ownership should be perceived as a unilateral breach, this was apparently acquiesced. In a unilateral breach, one party between the two legally competent parties pays his or her acquaintance to perform a certain duty upon which the other party is obliged to transfer back the funds once the duty has been accomplished (McKendrick & Cohen, 2005).

...

(a)When you arrive at work on Monday, you get a call from Java Distributors, who tells you that the week’s coffee cannot be delivered until Tuesday afternoon. You believe this is a clear breach of your contract with Java Distributors. What should you do? Fully discuss all of your options, and choose the one that is best for your business.

A contract provides the duties and obligations of each party privy to the contract. It also offers the remedies which are available to the parties in case of a breach. In this case, java distributors are responsible for the breach ...

Question1

The full revenue recognition ensures the matching principal is met. It establishes the accounting period where the expenses and revenues are recognized. In the case of the sale of an extended warranty, the method ensures all the cash is received at the period when extended warranty is sold. This method can be used to attract investors in the future because Circuit City Stores can manipulate this method to make their financial position better.

The deferral of revenue method could require the Circuit City Stores to change its accounting for extended warranty and product maintenance contracts. It could also ...

Emotivism is a frame of thought that is of the opinion that matters ethics do not express propositions but in essence they express emotional attitudes. This therefore discredits ethics as a genuine and unbiased frame of thought and relegates it to the mere emotions of the person in question. Thus matters ethics are nothing more than a person expressing their emotions. This attaches an emotional paradigm to ethics ass a frame of thought and eliminates the matter of neutrality or rather lack of biasness from ethics as a discipline. Thus, according to emotivism moral judgments are nothing more than strong and firm expression of emotions ...

A contract is a binding legal agreement between two parties that is made with the intention to create a legal relationship. Contracts in the English legal tradition are made by the exchange of consideration between the parties.

Fox v. Mountain West Electric, Inc., 137 Idaho 703 (2002)

In this case, Lockheed Martin had a building project which Fox and MWE decided to do jointly as a way of winning the bid to complete it. They created a document that acted as the scope of the work they were to complete and in the process, Fox worked under the supervision of a manager of MWE. There were changes in the terms of the building contract terms ...

International Legal and Ethical Issues in Business

Abstract

For an agreement to be considered a valid contract, it should have four vital elements that include an offer, acceptance, intention to be under legal consequences, and consideration. If any of the mentioned terms are missing from the contract, it is not legally binding. Objective theory of contracts is a legal notion that rejects the enforcement of thelaw that appears to be too good to be true. The contract, according to this theory, is binding only if a reasonable person from outside will judge objectively that the offer has been made, and it has been accepted. The soft drink company, in ...

Arbitrations, having their seat in England, are governed by the Arbitration Act of 1996, which is based on the UNCITRAL model law. The major international arbitration bodies affected by this jurisdiction are the London Maritime Arbitrators Association and the London Court of International Arbitration. However, it is also common for arbitrations that fall under the rules of other international bodies to base their cases in England. Based on a number of mandatory rules, the disputing parties are always at liberty to agree on the procedure for their arbitration or to employ institutional rules. Unless the parties agree otherwise, the provisions ...

QUESTION 1

The sole proprietorship is the ideal business for the Owen. This is because the type of business is small, and it has two employees hence this type of a business suit the design and the arrangement/ agreement of the owner and the employees. Furthermore, since the business is new it gives the owner enough time to assess the development of the business and how the workers perform their duties. Thus, the owner has the total control of the performance of the workers and how the business is run. Moreover, the sole proprietorship does not require much paper work to get ...

Contract Law

For a contract to be enforceable, there needs to be an offer, acceptance, meeting of the minds, and consideration. An offer is an expression of one’s willingness to enter into a contract with set terms with another party upon the proferance of acceptance by the other party. In this case Mickey has made an offer to Nucky that he is willing to sell him his home that is accessed at $10 million in the Cayman Islands for $50,000. Although Mickey has two homes in the Cayman Islands, the home proposed in the offer seems to be specified if he ...

The article is about movie star Clint Eastwood who damaged the career of Sandra Locke, his former girlfriend. Eastwood did so by securing her a movie development deal with Warner Bros which led to Locke calling off the palimony suit she had filed. Clint Eastwood then further used his influence to block Sandra Locke from directing any films. This led to Sandra Locke not working in any film as a director since signing the deal. This caused a serious harm to her career.

The case highlighted in this article is a classic example of how a party to a contract (first party) may intentionally interfere ...

Question 1

Regarding payment of legal services lawyers may select from one of the four arrangements of payment which comprise of rates divided according to an hourly, contingency, flat and retainer basis with a contingent, flat and retainer payment arrangement as the most commonly used. With contingency payment arrangement entailing an agreement between the client and the lawyer for taking of a specified percentage of the settlements; that are monetary as well as receiving damages payment from a case. These types of fees are normally charged in civil lawsuits instance in the case of medical malpractice as well as litigation in personal injury with ...

Scenario I

This is a case of Best and Discount. Apparently, Best and Discount had an agreement in the form of a contract wherein the former was to be supplied by the latter with clusters of goods, for the entire year, each cluster of which was worth at least 1,750 USD. In the end, Discount failed to adhere to the terms of the agreement. Best filed charges against Discount. In its defense, Discount explained that the plaintiff’s complaint cannot be qualified legally as a breach of contract because number one, the document that Discount’s employee, Robert, who signed the contract with ...

United Kingdom is one of the oldest unions in the world that have transformed most countries in the world. UK’s administrative system has helped transform many countries and regions around the world. This concept is the reason UK has been under pressure to implement some laws and legislation to help it deal with certain issues. UK’s contract law is an example of such like laws that were meant to tackle some unending legal issues. The history of this piece of legislation is traced centuries ago, and this makes this initiative on of the oldest legislation in the ...

Any contract between a logistics service provider and an individual that identifies specific services that will be offered by the logistics provider in measurable terms is known as a service level agreement. The contract is useful in the management of logistics providers by customers. Service level agreements are very useful in the logistics sector and are needed for various factors. Some of these factors are listed below.

Many companies in the recent past have relied upon contract manufacturers to provide logistics to their companies. Increased reliance on these manufacturers has created a need for service level agreements in order to access and ...

The situation in which John Jacobs and the local Chevrolet car dealer find themselves is a dire one. The two parties sign a contract that is both binding and legal. Both parties have an obligation to honor the conditions that have been set in the contract that they entered into together. John Jacobs breaches the contract that was signed when he is unable to pay the local Chevrolet dealer when he blatantly refuses to perform his obligations of the contract that he was to pay for the monthly instalments. In this case, John Jacobs is the defaulting party and the local ...

Scenario one

Oral contracts are equally binding and enforceable as written contracts (Thorpe and Bailey, 1999). However, the biggest disadvantage with oral contracts is the difficulty in ascertaining the precise terms should the parties differ. Where the parties are unable to prove their respective positions, the court will have recourse to the intention of the parties. In this scenario, the contract between Vivian and Hicks is oral, and to such extent Vivian can sue for breach of contract. It is however not clear what the terms where. Vivian claims that Hicks agreed to pay for all damages, whereas Hicks says he ...

There are several things that should have been done differently in order for the business deal to be sealed successfully. When conducting business meetings, Tim and fellow associates should have formalized and ritualized their greetings while in Japan, they need to show correct amount of respect and deference to individuals at Bonsai Company based upon their status and relative to that of the Canadians. Since they were foreigners in japan, they are expected to carry their business cards and while shaking hands, they should have a form of greeting where they bow. The level of which the Canadians will bow ...

Currently, over 80 percent of business transactions are governed by contractual agreements. In recent years business contracts have become significantly more complex with complicated legal language and a numerous of terms and conditions governing the terms of the contract. Contracts is an agreement binding two or more people. The agreement can be on behalf of persons or companies they represent. There are certain legal requirements that must be adhered to for a contract to be enforceable, but they are seldom an issue in business contracts. The business contracts do not have to be written because they are enforceable in a court of ...

CITE: USA Today, Oct. 2, 2013, page 34.

FACTS: Katherine Jackson, mother to Michael Jackson brought a suit on negligence against AEG Live LLC. AEG Live LLC was a concert promotion company that produced Jackson’s comeback concerts. Katherine argued that AEG Live LLC acted negligently in hiring the physician responsible for administering the medication that killed Michael. Conrad Murray, the physician, was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in November 2011 for administering a propofol overdose that lead to the death of the singer.

In their negligence claim, the family sought to show that AEG Live LLC was responsible for hiring the ...

Question one

Many firms’ prefers using cost-plus pricing for most of their supply contracts because it gives an opportunity to develop a large project whose capital or start up amount is hard to determine or predict. It simply means that using the cost-plus pricing assist the firms in doing the estimates of the amount of task that is required to be completed with a stipulated period of time. It is also a convenient way to price their products by determining the break-even – point of the goods in question. The entire process takes place through the calculation of the production, distribution along with the ...

Ethical and cultural relativism have been defined as differences in opinion among people from different cultures as a result of their belonging to such cultures. Put differently, as a result of growing up in different cultural environments, people acquire certain sets of beliefs which are distinct from those of persons who grew up in other cultures. The end result is that both groups of persons have different beliefs about what is right or wrong as a result of the cultural conditioning that they have undergone. Proponents of the cultural relativism school of thought have argued that as a result of these differences in ...

The contract is between a farmer and the processing company. The two parties came to a solemn agreement on the terms and condition that builds the contract. The contract states that the after the farmer makes his or her harvest, he should supply the factory with the produce for processing. The terms of payment for the supplies are; the farmer would supply half of the farm produces and in turn the factory would promptly pay for the supply. The company would evaluate the quality of the products by processing the entire supply. If the products are up to the standards, the ...

- Contract Terms and Conditions

Our organization may opt to use the RFP as the ideal document for binding the contract between us and the contractor or possibly draw up separate document that will serve as the contract. Either way, contract condition and terms must be clear, present and agreed to by the two involved parties. The RFP contract provides general conditions and terms which we could use. However, if the agency involved in the contract determines that an HSP is required and subcontracting opportunities are possible, then all respondents will be required to submit the HSP alongside all their supporting documentation and proposal. ...

Part 1

The procurement process of all the departments from different managers across the organization is what is referred to as coordinated procurement. Procurement is obtaining products and services from outside. In a project procurement process is very important because delivery of goods and other resources for the project should be within time and budget. The administrative cost incurred by each manager in the process of procurement is minimized if the process is less than one office. The older project managers have concerns and views that should be addressed. As the person in charge it is important to clarify issues with the ...

The competitive proposal method which is better known as negotiated procurement is the main substitute to sealed bidding for contract requirements. Distinct to the sealed bidding method, the competitive proposal method authorizes consideration of technical issues other than price. Negotiation of contract price or estimated cost and other contract terms and conditions are also permissible. In the competitive proposal approach revision of proposals is done prior to the final contractor selection and the drawing out of an offer at any time is a possibility. Contractors normally choose the method of procurement that is reasonable and is based on the evidences ...

1. Employment at will is a law that stipulates that a contract of employment of undetermined duration could be ended at any time, without incurring any liabilities, by party, the employer or the employee at any time chosen for any chosen reason except an illegal one. It is only maintained in the U.S except the state of Montana. Other industrial powers like France, Germany, Canada, Italy, Japan, Sweden and Great Britain have statutory provisions that state that employers are required to show good cause before firing their employees. There are three exceptions to this rule, the first is breach of ...

In reference to Case of Gibson versus Manchester City Council there is an agreement to the terms of contract between the council and Mr. Gibson and the application had been received successfully and this meant that it was a valid contract. However, the legal argument before the court is that the contract according Mr. Gibson was is that there was an agreement from the city council replay to his application. In the council advocate claimed that plaintiff replay cannot be considered a contract agreement. According to the plaintiff, the deal may be considered changes of terms that were in the original ...

Question A

Introduction

Currency risk arises due to fluctuations of the currency as a result of supply and demand of the currency. Any business or companies that carry out operations in another country is subject to currency risk. Currency risk management helps to cushion the business against any adverse effects of currency fluctuations. Exchange rate movements may result to a gain to the business or a loss. Due to the uncertainty involved in predicting the effects of currency fluctuations, businesses tend to engage in currency management options.

There are various methods that can be used in managing currency risk. Forward foreign exchange, also known ...

Sales and contracts

In the business world, some companies to lease goods from the businesses that have already purchased the goods rather than purchasing themselves. Leasing basically involves the transfer of possession from one owner to the lessee. The rights of a person are different from the rights of a person who have purchased the goods. The lesser of good have the right for the consideration and the good have to be returned at the end of the lessee period.

A merchant is an important person under the uniform commercial code. In article two of the UCC; it is clear that merchants are very ...

Criminal Law

1. Parol evidence rule refers to the evidence of previous or simultaneous oral rule that written contracts may not be varied, contradicted, or changed by any previous or contemporaneous oral declarations. Parol evidence is admitted when a written contract does not include or contradicts the oral understanding reached by the parties. Under the parole evidence rule, when the court finds that that written contract has represented the final and complete statement of the parties to an agreement, it will no longer allow either party to submit parole evidence (Miller, 2011, p.187).

2. The statute of frauds refers to the requirement ...

The contract entered by the 17-year-old son, who is a minor with Don is voidable. The contract can be invalidated on the ground that the contract of sale that was entered between him and Don can be annulled since the son is only a minor and he was not the designated representative of the company. Hence, once the contract is nullified, the effect is that it is as if there is no agreement at all. This is due to the fact that the minor cannot represent the company since there is no board resolution to empower him to enter the contract.

...

Question 1

Jurisdiction is a term used to define the powers of a court. Personal jurisdiction refers to the power of a given court to give judgments against a particular defendant while subject-matter jurisdiction refers to the power of a court to hear and make judgments on a particular type of case (Chao and Christine, 9). Parties to a contract have considerable freedom in formulating terms of a contract. This includes resolution of disputes arising from the contract. Minimum contract law can be used to determine if a court in one state has personal jurisdiction over a defendant from another state. The relevance of the minimum contract rule is that it ...

Let me start by briefly stating what the case is all about. In the case, Hussein, an owner of an apparently very attractive car, has been offered 4000 USD by Interjeet in exchange of his car. In other words, Interjeet wanted to buy Hussein’s car. Considering the average prices of automotive vehicles today, it would seem that 4000 USD is a steeply low price. As expected, Hussein did not give any word about Interjeet’s offer and has kept himself mum. He thought and felt that his car is worth more than what Interjeet has offered. Hussein did not ...

1. Explain the types of mistakes and the types of misrepresentation which can give rise to a court being required to interpret a contract. What remedies are appropriate to each type?

In the law of contracts, mistake refers to the belief in a set of facts or fact that is erroneous and, therefore, not available. Mistake often arises in relation to the conditions and terms of the contract. One or both of the parties to the contract may rely on a fact or set of facts as forming the conditions or terms of the contract. In circumstances where it is later obtained that the set of facts was erroneous, they are held as mistakes in contract. There are two broad categories of mistakes depending on the parties involved. In cases in which ...

Question One: Types of Mistakes and the Types of Misrepresentation

A mistake in contract law forms the basis of invalidating and rescinding a contract. It can be defined as a faulty action, belief or term in agreement when the contracting parties are drafting or engaging in the contract. There are two different types of mistake that have been identified in common law, which form the basis of argument requiring interpretation of the contract from the court. These mistakes include the unilateral mistake and the mutual mistake, which is also referred to as common mistake. Establishing that there was a mistake in the contract makes the court render the contact as void ab ...

Tim advertised that he was selling his Porch Short Boxer car in the newspaper to which the rogue later responded by visiting him. The advertisement by Tim is merely an invitation to treat which essentially paves the way for submission of offers to which Tim is free to accept or reject. This was the case in Partridge v Crittenden where Lord Parker CJ made a comment to the effect that if an advertisement were to be regarded as an offer, advertisers would be faced with a situation where they are under an obligation to sell the advertised goods to everyone who ...

Business Law Questions

Business Law Questions

This is the most suitable theory for the partners and the breach of contract. The breach of warranty highlights the damages which are available to the disappointed buyer when the specific seller has breached the article which explicitly stipulates the qualitative warranties. This implies that any buyer who unconditionally allows products that are nonconforming and who also follow the other conditions before he/she recovers the goods has the right to claim warranty.

Consequently, a breach of contract claim exists when the seller fails even to deliver the products when the need arise. This implies that in order ...

Question 1

A contract can simply be defined as a legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties or entities. It is an agreement which places different obligations on the various parties to the contract. The breach of the obligations created by the contract would amount to a violation of the contract and the aggrieved party would be entitled to the various remedies that as per the terms contained in the contract . For an agreement to be considered as a contract and thus enforceable in law, it must have some certain characteristics. These are referred to as the elements of a contract. The elements of a ...

Introduction

There are many contracts between different people regarding different contexts, which range from implied to express contracts. These are agreements between two parties regarding a specific action which are based on legal obligations thus enforceable by law. Contacts are based on several principles which should be satisfied by all the parties to ensure it passes as a legal contract. The absence of any of these elements can lead to the disqualification of the credibility of the contract thus making it illegal.

The benefit of a contract is to ensure all the parties are willing and aware of the basics thus acquisition of ...

The primary difference between a motion for summary judgment and a motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the evidence is:

In considering the summary judgment record, what attitude should the court adopt in evaluating the materials offered?

Smith sues Jones for negligence and assault resulting from a car accident, where Jones hit Smith with his car as Smith was crossing the street. The case goes to trial and both issues are fully litigated. The court finds for Smith on the negligence issue, but does not rule in the assault issue. Collateral estoppel will bar Smith from relitigating the assault issue in a second lawsuit because both issues arose from the same incident, and because both ...

1.A.1. A newspaper columnist signs a contract with a newspaper chain. Several months later, she is offered a position with another newspaper chain at a higher salary. Because she would prefer making more money, she notifies the first chain that she is breaking her contract. The courts will decide the legality of her action. But what of the morality? Did the columnist behave ethically?

When a newspaper columnist signed a contract with a newspaper chain, she is bound by the terms and conditions of the agreement. Whatever is stated in the contract binds legally the columnist and the newspaper chain. If after several months later, another ...

Contract refers to the agreement of having a lawful element entered through voluntary actions between two or more parties. These parties may be individuals, groups, states among other groups. The parties have an intention of creating one or more legal obligations among or between them. There are elements in every contract that must be respected by all parties involved in the formulation of the contract. The law of contract stipulates respect for all principles in an agreement. Since the contract is not embedded to one party, honoring the stipulations for the contract is a core requirement. This means that all parties ...

It has recently been brought to my attention that the purchaser of the Glebe Cottage, is concerned with the purchase arrangements made through Cooper Taylor Solicitors. I have reviewed this issues and have surmised that further review of this arrangement is needed by the company.

There appear to be many conflicting interests in this case. The previous owner Ms. Smith had in place several contracts premising neighbors to use her property over an extended period. Now that the property in the process of transferal, these previous contract issues have been cause for concern from the neighbors. The contracted are ...

Introduction

A contract can be defined as a relation between two parties, who enter into an agreement that will be bidding to them and enforceable by law. The consent of the parties should be a voluntary affair. There are various categories of contracts. The following cases studied below fall under the category of a sale of goods contract. For a sale of goods contract to be legally binding to the two parties, it must fulfill all the legal requirements of a valid contract. This means that there should be adherence to the requisite elements which include an offer, an unequivocal acceptance, and intention between the ...

There are two main categories of contracts. These are written and oral contracts. Jones and Nussbaum had a valid contract that is enforceable. It is vital to note that all contracts whether made orally or written are enforceable if they are valid. Therefore, the agreement between Jones and Nussbaum was enforced breach which entitles the innocent party to redress. The facts in issue in this case are whether Nussbaum is entitled to be compensated for doing work that involved costs and the same was not evidenced in writing. This is despite an express provision within the contract that all work ...

Business Law Short Essay

A contract is said to be valid if it meets all the requirements of law relating to contracts. Such a contract is recognized and protected by the law. This means that a valid contract is enforceable in law. Enforceability means that the law can be used to make good the obligations, rights and duties of the parties to the contract. As such, should a party go back on their promise, they may be compelled by law to make good the promise. A valid contract may be written or oral depending on the parties to it. It is however not worth that where ...

Assignment 1:

The main learning objective for this past week was to study the process involved in planning the procurement of materials that are meant to be used for the completion of a certain project. During the study, a detailed analysis was carried out on each individual process that comprises the the procurement process of a certain project. Before delving into discussions on what factors are considered when coming up with plan for procuring the materials required for a project, we began by understanding the meaning of a project’s procurement process. The discussion on the broad meaning of what is a project procurement process, was ...

The Reasons Schools Contract Out their Services to Private Companies

The use of contracting services out to specialized service providers is increasing in school districts nationwide. Two of the most frequent areas where this practice occurs are in the custodial and transportation areas. The primary reason that this subcontracting of services is initialed is to save money. Many districts are struggling financially and service providers tout a huge savings while saving the school district’s administrative and other headaches in the process. Relieving some of the headaches from administrators might sound well and good, but in truth, however, that in some cases, the subcontracting of services does save school ...

Introduction

A negotiable instrument is a document that guarantees payment to a specific person. The instrument must name the payee or otherwise indicate his identity. A negotiable instrument is transferable and in essence, it is a signed document with a promise to pay the holder of the document a given fixed amount of money at a specified date or on demand. Upon the transfer of the instrument, the legal title of the instrument is passed to the owner.

Promise and negotiable instruments

A negotiable instrument is a document used in contracts, and which guarantees the payment of a given sum of money unconditionally on demand or at a future date. It is a promise ...

The growing popularity of the online business has brought up a significant impact on the contract law. In the past days, people used meet so that they can discuss on the term of the contract under subject. In this case, the parties involved had to agree on the same terms when they met. However, due to the emergency of internet, people do not necessarily need to meet in order to develop a contract. As a result, the internet had positively affected the contracts. In the recent years, people simply engage in agreements by a click of a mouse to agree on the transaction terms. ...

BUSINESS LAW

PART A 1. A contract refers to an agreement or a promise that is legally enforceable (Carter, 2006). In most cases, two parties are involved in making the agreement. For an agreement to be considered to be a contract, it must have some basic elements. The first basic element of a simple contract is offer (Allan and Hiscok). In general, terms, offer is the willingness that a party to the contract may express to certain terms of the contract. The offer is mostly made with the intention that the agreement immediately becomes binding after the offer has been accepted by the offeree ( ...

Timmy Aldrich is a high school student who has been hired to sweep up the backrooms of Smedley Bottled Gas Company’s warehouse for two hours every Friday. Therefore, Timmy works two hours a week for the company. Under the law, Timmy may be classified as an independent contractor instead of an employee. To determine whether Timmy is an employee or an independent contractor, you will want to examine such things as whether or not Timmy offers his cleaning services to other businesses. As Timmy only works for that company for two hours on Friday, he could go to other businesses ...

- For Locke:John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, 1689 In the “second treatise of government”, Locke advocates that governments are formed through mutual agreement. He is of the view that those who are given the mandate to govern must do so without violating the fundamental rights and freedoms of the people. He opines that people acquire the rights to property, life, and liberty upon birth. Locke’s contention is that governments are supposed to protect the foregoing rights for the benefit of the citizens. Accordingly, he observes that the power to make laws is a preserve of the people. ...

Introduction

The case dwells upon a decision, which is to be taken by the Global Positioning System Navigator (GPSN) Manager Wally Wizard at the largest automobile manufacturer in the United States, Behemoth Motors Corp (BMC). The scope of the decision looks at two alternatives: 1) in-house production of 8,000 units of GPSN per months to be installed on the Sports Utility Vehicles (SUV), and 2) outsourcing of this production volume to reasonably new Far East Enterprises (FEE) Company under the terms of two-year contract. There are three critical aspects that should be considered as part of the decision-making process: financial ...

When a breach of contract occurs, there must be a remedy of damages. This is the payment in one form or the other for a breach of contract by the breaching party, to the non-breaching party. There are various kinds of remedies, which include; Compensatory damages, Punitive damages, and Liquidated damages. In the law of contract, when a breach of contract occurs, the non-breaching party has to do all he/she can in order to minimize, the damages caused by the breach (Calamari and Perillo 45). However, some contracts contain provisions that specify a certain sum of money that is payable by the breaching party, ...

The Oltz v. St. Peter’s Community Hospital The Oltz v. St. Peter’s Community Hospital Anti-trust laws or statutes are of fundamental importance to the health sector, as they influence existing health care entities in several ways. Influence is significant in factors such as how the health care entities grow and expand, especially regarding their relations with medical providers and suppliers and in their own individual or group interaction. Anti-trust statutes, as found under the United States anti-trust law, pertain to a collection of both state and federal government laws that are crucial in regulating the overall ...

1. Introduction The supreme construction Pvt Ltd is one of the leading companies in the field of construction. Our company has a lot of clients; we are in this business since 25 years. The government has assigned the construction projects to the CE enterprises. CE enterprises have to build an IT park near the capital city. Initially, we need to choose the geological area for construction work: we need to choose the soil type and water: We need to choose the resources and the depth of the water table and the building area. The size of the building is ...

The critical behavior in the tender negotiation process

In discussing this contract with industry members, it is advisable while to possess characters that should send a signal of one who can be trusted and win the GPS Navigation System tender. This is a critical area that shows the capability of the fulfillment of the required conditions if our organization is to be awarded the tender. There are several behaviors that are most important. Professionalism and efficiency will convey information concerning our company in this tender application process . These qualities will show full knowledge in this field. In addition, being efficient will give the government agent, who is the supervisor, ...

Introduction

Disputes in the construction industry or in the process of honoring roles in a construction contract are not uncommon in many countries, a good of example which would be the United Arab Emirates (UAE) wherein the construction industry has been in a stage of boom for the past several years . Some of the world’s Mega structures and other fascinating architectural works are located in this Middle Eastern country. It is one of the largest exporters of oil and petroleum products and this country’s largest city, Dubai, is home to a range of spectacular and grand architectural works. It is home to ...

Domestic Sale of Goods

The selling of goods in the United Kingdom (UK) and the binding contract between both (seller and buyer) are regulated by The Sales of Goods Act (1979) together with its later Amendments. A contract for the sale of goods provides that the transfer of goods for the seller to the buyer will only be complete through money or consideration transaction also known as the price. In some instances, the contracts for the sale of goods will have additional terms and conditions that are super-imposed to the general rules that are applicable to specific contracts. These contracts include sale of ...