Judge Research Papers Samples For Students

Abstract

The following paper is dedicated to the analysis of court martial proceedings in the United States of America. The paper is aimed not only at discussing the proceedings themselves in the light of constitutional rights of the accused, but comparing court-martial process with the one, existing in civilian courts. Starting point of the work deals with discussing types and competences of courts-martial, as well as highlighting general issues related to their functioning. Thereafter different stages of the process are described with an emphasis on their differences from the ones of the civilian courts’ process. Selected procedural safeguards (e.g., presumption ...

1. Prosecutorial Misconduct
Prosecutorial misconduct refers to any situation in which the prosecutor in the course of litigating a case breaks a law, violates a code of ethics or misbehaves to such an extent that the fairness of the criminal justice process is unambiguously tilted in her favor. An example of prosecutorial misconduct would be a prosecutor who prior to trial fails to turn over a key piece of evidence that provides an alibi for the defendant, and tells a witness friendly to the defendant that she will tell the federal authorities about his illegal immigration status if he testifies. Moreover, at trial the ...

Introduction

The governor of the state of Texas Rick Perry authorizes availability of the HPV vaccine that will be dispensed through the Texas Vaccines for Children program for suitable young girls up to 18 years of age. The health and Human Services Commission shall avail the vaccine to Medicaid-qualified young girls from age of 19 to 21.The rules concerning the administration of the vaccination program shall be based on the standards that the Health and Human Services Executive Commissioner uses during the admission to the sixth grade. The governor creates exclusive public awareness concerning the vaccine as he pushes the ...

Trial vs. Plea Bargaining

Trial
The oldest and most well-known form of dispute resolution in criminal cases is the jury trial (Kadri, 2005). Certainly, the jury trial is the fundamental dispute resolution mechanism of the American adversarial legal system. In fact, the core principle of the criminal justice system holds that disputes are most effectively resolved when the parties in contention are made responsible for: (1) investigating and gathering their own evidence and (2) presenting their own arguments to a neutral and passive lay decision-maker who decides which party presented the most convincing argument (Kadri, 2005). Furthermore, the entire process is subject to ...

Criminal Law

Calder (2013) argued that the federal court Judge Shira Scheindlin of Manhattan has declared that the controversial stop-and-frisk practices of the New York Police Department (NYPD) for being unconstitutional since the police force had acted with deliberate indifference against the minorities. As an effect, the act of NYPD in sanctioning those who are apprehended for stop-and-frisk has violated the Constitutional provisions on searches and seizures as guaranteed by the Fourth Amendment. Furthermore, the police was charged for directly targeting minorities and transgressed their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment against equal protections and due process and the Fourth Amendment rights ...

Prosecutorial misconduct

Prosecutorial misconduct refers to a procedural defense usually available to the defendant in criminal matters whereby the defendant advances an argument that the court should not hold them criminally liable for actions which may be criminal for the reason that the prosecution acted unfairly. The defense arises in various instances such as where the prosecution knowingly sanctioned false testimony and where the prosecution withheld evidence. It is therefore a violation of laws or ethical rules by the prosecutors (Texas District and County Attorneys Association (TDCAA), 2012).
A real-life example of prosecutorial misconduct was apparent in the case of U.S. v. ...

Introduction

The pretrial process refers to the meeting between the two parties involves in a certain case prior to its trial. it normally takes place before the selected trial magistrate or judge who is entitle or has the judicial powers.In a civil or criminal case, this process takes place prior to the actual trial. It only occurs in the events where either of the parties request or if the court order for it. The major reasons that lead the parties and the court to request for the conference, is to ensure that there is full utilization of the existing pretrial activities. It ...

Abstract

This is an essay that investigates juvenile delinquency in the United States. It shows that juveniles who commit adult crimes should be tried as adults. It also shows that committing crimes is not a product of environment or poverty but a matter of choice.
The twenty-first century is the era of technical advancement is phenomenal; unfortunately, technology is not the only thing that has exceeded expectation; crimes among juvenile has gotten to an all-time high.
Juvenile delinquency is not a present day problem, as long as there were crimes committed juvenile crimes has always taken its slot. Even though the ...

Introduction

Caperton v. Massey case decision is one of famous and significant decision taken by Supreme Court of United States. The final ruling of the court about the case is stated on 8th June, 2009 and the court decided that it is against the constitution for the Supreme Court judge to hear a case that have had some financial interests involved for the judge from the individual who filed up the case. This decision has also expedited the long lasting debate that whether the judge at higher courts should be elected or whether they should be appointed by the respective committee.

Discussion

...

Orienthal James Simpson was a well-known celebrity in North America. He was a football player who upon retirement from the National Football League turned to acting. His ex -wife Nicole Brown and her friend Ronald Goldman were found brutally murdered outside Nicole’s residence on June 12, 1994. The police had a thorough scan of the crime scene in search of evidence. Crucial DNA evidence showing that Simpson was involved in the murder was found (Dershowitz, 1997).
OJ Simpson’s trial was named “the trial of the century” because it had become the most publicized case of all time in the ...

Introduction

The Jury has the power to exercise nullification while conducting jury duties. This power is accorded as a matter of practice and in common law, and not necessarily under legislation. Jury nullification occurs when the fact finding is clear of the defendant’s guilt, but the jury relying on its own understanding of fairness and justice, decides to acquit. There has been on going debate as to whether the judges should inform the jury of their nullification ability or not. This paper explores the position that the jury should not be informed of their nullification powers (Bellin, 2010).

Background

The nullification ...

This is provided for in the 6th amendment of the U.S constitution. It guarantees the accused two cardinal rights during trial. These include the accused right to attend all proceeding in a case against him and the accused right to challenge an adverse witness’s testimony. These are critical rights as they ensure that the accused receives a fair, just and transparent trial. The clause also shields the accused from hearsay evidence because he cannot be able to challenge them. Moreover, the accused is able to test the veracity, sincerity and memory of the witness.

Types of Evidence

There are five main categories of ...

Introduction

The United States has a Judiciary arm which is bound and guided by the United States Constitution. Although independent, the Judiciary professionals are guided by the code of conduct clearly stated in the constitution of the United States during their roles in dealing with crime. Part I:a) Parts of the Constitution of the United States most relevant to the ethical standards of professionals in the judiciary
In the united states Constitution, Section I, Article III , It states how Judicial power extends to every case, in Law and Equity occurring under the Constitution, United States Laws and Treaties completed or ...

HTA Architects Ltd & Anor v Countryside Properties Plc & Ors [2002] EWHC 482 (TCC) (26 March 2002)

HTA Architects Ltd & Anor v Countryside Properties Plc & Ors [2002] EWHC 482 (TCC) (26 March 2002)
Background to parties
The case involves two broad parties; the claimant and the respondents. The claimants in the case are Hunt Thompson Associates (“HTA”) and HTA Architects Ltd. The defendants, were Countryside Properties Plc (“Countryside”), Taywood Homes Ltd. (“Taywood”), and Taylor Woodrow Plc (“TW”). The case arises on the domain of contract law. In the 1990’s in the City of London, the Greenwich Peninsula was set for redevelopment. In that strain, it was agreed that the Millennium Dome be constructed ...

OUTLINE
- Introduction
- Part 1: Thesis
- Part 2: Body
- Part 3: Conclusion
- Reference page

Introduction

The judiciary refers to a system of courts, which help in the interpretation and application of laws within a state. It is a system that also helps in the resolution of disputes within the state. There exist a clear cut difference between the legislature and the judiciary (Malleson, 2005). The legislature has the responsibility of making the laws, but the judiciary interprets the law and applies it to the situation at hand. The judiciary system helps in solving disputes and ...

The O.J. Simpson Case
The O.J. Simpson Case
O.J Simpson also known as Orienthal James Simpson was a renowned footballer. O.J was an athlete, an actor, a father and a husband to Marguerite who he later divorced and married Nicole Brown. The O.J Simpson case also known as the People of the state of California V. Orienthal James Simpson case was a criminal trial that took place in Los Angeles, California (Bugliosi, 1997). This was one of the most publicized trials in the American history. In this trial, O.J Simpson was tried on two counts of murder of his ex wife ...

The Judge

The judge in the court plays one of the most fundamental functional roles in the criminal justice system. As a judge, society through the State confers on one the responsibility of administering justice. The duty to administer justice is complex and multifaceted. It involves the dual and usually contradicting function of ensuring the accused and the complainants receive justice. In the absence of caution, competence and diligence, a miscarriage of justice can be allowed either in favour of the accused or the complainant. It, therefore, remains of paramount essence to excise due diligence and caution in the excise of the functional ...

- Homeland Security as created by the US constitution after the 9/11 terrorist attack to the World Trade center in New York. Since then, it has boosted the Defense policy in a number of ways. It has ensured enhanced scanning of all flight passengers in all US bound flights to ensure that there is no chances of sneaking explosive devices in such planes. Homeland Security has also utilized the modern technology in dealing with terror threats. In this way, it has used the modern scanning devices to screen all passengers before any flight can commence. It has also installed CCTV ...

Ever since the Constitution of the United States was framed, the definition of perjury has remained somewhat the same, although perjury now goes beyond court proceedings. Perjury can be defined as a “a crime committed when a lawful oath is administered, in some judicial proceeding, to a person who swears wilfully, absolutely and falsely, in a matter material to the issue or point in question” (Blackstone, 1765). Federal perjury laws are codified in the United States Code, in chapter 79, under title 18 ("18 USC chapter," 2012). The definition of perjury involving judicial proceedings can be found under section 1623 of the chapter and a ...

Abstract

Juvenile judiciary system was established in early 1900s. The system has been in place since then. However, the impacts of the juvenile judiciary systems have recently raise a lot of concerns. Some consider it as a poor option that should be abolished so that every citizen faces the full strength of law. Whereas others look at it as the second chance that the adolescents need to become responsible citizens. Indeed failing to punish the juvenile offenders is a contest that is yet to be won, but owing to its many flows, I coincide with the opponents of the juvenile judiciary system. It ...

In the state of Georgia, there are different levels of courts with varied mandates. At the bottom of the pyramid are the municipal, magistrate, probate, juvenile and the state courts. Above them there lies superior, appeals and supreme courts with increasing level of mandate and where appeals can be launched from junior courts. For a nomination of a person into a judge position, recommendation has to be done to the governor by the Judicial Nomination Commission. The governor then makes the appointment if the suggested person meets the laid down qualification depending on the state. Some of the positions are elective depending ...

The O. J. Simpson Murder Trial

“A great trash novel come to life” (Linder, 2000). This is what the criminal trial of Orenthal James Simpson was referred to as. However it cannot be denied that the American public had been deeply captivated by the trial. Initially, reports of the Murder of the ex-NF: football star’s wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, did not capture the full attention of the people. However, 95 million television viewers did witness the live police chase, with Simpson behind the wheel of his infamous Bronco ride. It was quite the shock when the “Not Guilty” verdict ...

A jury trial is a legal proceeding whereby a case is presented to a jury to make decisions and findings of fact and reach a verdict which is later applied by a judge. A jury is a group of people sworn in to hear, judge, and give a verdict on a given case. Jury trials are regularly used in serious criminal cases. The work of a jury is to scrutinize the evidence provided in the courtroom and agree on whether beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime in question.

The first step in a jury trial is the jury selection. This is a process where jurors are vetted ...

This paper sets out to examine the role of the jury in the United States Criminal Justice system and, more specifically, just how safe are the verdicts that the jury reaches in criminal trials. According to Judge Rebecca Knight (2007), a defendant’s right to a trial by jury was written into the 1776 Constitution and ratified in its later updates. Knight quoted the original Constitution as stating “the ancient mode of trial by jury is one of the best securities of the rights of the people, and ought to remain sacred and inviolable.” As a basic principle, it does seem logical ...

It is unethical for a prosecutor to file charges in cases where the prosecutor has insufficient evidence of guilty. A prosecutor deserves to have sufficient evidence, which justifies one to be guilty. This is because the evidence presented by a prosecutor acts as the main guiding factor towards criminal charges hearing. In addition, the same evidence facilitates in convincing defendants lawyers of a crime committed by the individual who is being charged. As such, evidence of a prosecutor indicates to a judge that a probable cause exists in violation of the law.

Factors considered in a decision to charge an individual with a criminal offence are determined ...

Contextual Study

A study of the interactions between a judge and the defendant in a courtroom hearing is an example of a contextual setting providing elements of a research study. From the provisions of a contextual study, the courtroom setting provides an excellent example to review the contextual elements of a research paper. From the courtroom setting, everything in the courtroom is the context of the study including the nonverbal expressions and exchanges that take place. For instance, the exchanges that take place between the judge and the defendants over a case form an intriguing basis for contextual elements. The judge needs clarification from the defendant over a case ...

Inductive Thematic Analysis

Introduction
Drug crimes are increasingly becoming a major concern on both local and global fronts. Current research (Braun and Clarke, 2012) suggests that the thematic analysis of important data sources such as sentencing remarks would facilitate the efficacy of available strategies in these crimes. The purpose of this assignment is to analyse the themes that comprise the societal understanding of the occurrence and penalties of drug-related crime. The researcher uses information from seven courtroom sentencing remarks from Adelaide, Southern Australia. This inductive thematic analysis identifies overarching themes that are evident across all seven documents. The themes include “gender and ...

Introduction

Sexuality refers to sensation and linked closeness between two human beings. In psychological terms, sexuality is the way through which people make an expression of the completeness of love between a woman and a man. In biological terms, this is the means through which the conception of a child occurs and the ancestry is passed over to the next generation. The purpose of this paper is to look at the issue of public expressions of sexuality concerning the law in the United States. In this paper, is going to be established that public expressions of sexuality in the United ...

Abstract

In any state, the court system and structure plays a significant role in ensuring the judicial system is effective. States that have a strong court system have proved to be successful in solving major challenges as pertains to the interpretation of the constitution. Puerto Rico needs to have in place a strong court system to ensure that the enforcement of various dynamics is effective.
In coming up with the court system and structure, this paper heavily borrows from three states: Tennessee, Florida and South Carolina. These states are well-known for their strong legal systems. Because of this, it would ...

Except for the federal court system, there is not unified judicial selections process in the United States. Each state has developed its own unique process to qualify select and remove its judges. This short paper will examine the judicial selection processes of Hawaii and Washington State.
I. Hawaii
The Hawaiian court system is composed of three levels. The Supreme Court of Hawaii is the highest court in the state. It hears appeals properly brought before it from the state’s lower appellate courts, however, the Supreme Court has discretion to choose which appeals it will hear. The ...

Judicial Philosophy, Activism and Restraint

Judicial philosophy is defined as the way a prosecutor or judge interprets and understands the law. The laws that are followed around the world are considered to be universal but some have reservations when it comes to certain cases under unique circumstances. In scenarios like this, the judge would investigate and determine the real meaning of the written law and find out the real intent of why it is written.
There are two main types of philosophy which is essential in decision making – the judicial activism and judicial constraint (The American Prospect n.p). Judicial activism is very much in ...

The case of Marbury v. Madison

The American legal system is Anglo Saxon and significantly different from the continental legal system, with much broader powers of the Supreme Court, which does not recognize the justice of other countries.
The American judicial system is known for being based on the case law, and because of the time the Supreme Court had more weight, while at the end of the judicial power did not become competent to say what law is. The entire American public sovereignty is divided into three mutually independent, equitable, and consistent powers. Framers of the Constitution are, insisted on the independence of ...

1.0 Germany
Germany is a democratic and social federal Nation with 16 states[ CITATION An10 \l 2057 ]. The government of Germany is structured in three independent arms (Executive, Legislature and Judiciary). The 16 states (Länder) are each governed by a parliamentary system (Land government). Members of the state legislature are elected directly by popular vote. A minister president appointed by the largest party or coalition of parties leads the Land government and appoints the state cabinet. The state governments are fairly independent from the federal government with the federal government playing more legislative roles and the state government mainly ...

Criminal justice research project

Overview
The respect and application of the rule of law is the integral function of the criminal justice system. Criminal justice system can be termed as collective institutions of implementing justice through upholding the constitution. Such institutions aid in mitigating and preventing crime, in the line of maintaining integrity, transparency and coexistence of the society. What is more, criminal justice institutions incorporate powerful structures, which propagate quality implementation of criminal justice. Similarly, criminal justice system is a process that entails arresting, investigating, prosecuting and imprisonment of criminals who violate the rule of law. AS a result, criminal justice system can ...

Introduction

As we all well know, the jails are becoming more and more crowded with each passing month, and it has gotten to the point where putting a criminal in jail is not an option anymore. Ultimately, judges as well as other officials are aware of the limited capacity of the jails not just in their jurisdiction, but in others outside of their own as well. Some criminals or even first time offenders feel relieved at the fact that they can get away with murder, and no one can stop them. If they are stopped then they are instead let go, ...

Introduction

A Moral Dilemma is a complex situation than involves a mental conflict between choices over a given action. A choice between two almost equal and conflicting alternatives. The course of action taken seemingly leads to the transgression of the other choice (Pollock, 2010). In the Criminal Justice system, professionals face numerous moral dilemmas due to their positions as custodians of justice (Landesman, 2011). Examples of Criminal Justice professionals are police officers, forensic scientists, probation officers, correctional officers, judges and magistrates, prosecutor among others (Pollock, 2010). These CJ professionals may lack adequate evidence to convict an accused person, may be tempted to take ...

The federal court system of the United States has been divided into 94 federal judicial districts in order to efficiently dispense federal justice. The physical extent of the powers of each judiciary is not necessarily bound by state borders or borders of any specific kind, but is decided by Congress (“Court Role and Structure”). For example, the District of Wyoming has jurisdiction over all of Yellowstone National Park, including the areas of the park that are located in Montana and Idaho. Another example is that of New Jersey, where the physical extent of the jurisdiction includes Camden, Newark, and ...

Introduction

The Texas executive order RP67 entails a decision by Rick Perry the Texas governor to change the structure of the Higher Education funding. The governor aims at developing a funding program that will reward students and institutional outcomes that are in line with the expectations of the state. He lays a structure that will oversee the success of the project. The committee will have one public member who is appointed by the governor, the presiding officer of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board, and the commissioner of higher education (Perry 01). The governor will be the general overseer of the project.

The ...

The Australian administration law has developed over the last three decades. The framework of the law is marked by the comprehensive system of the administration law. Key elements addressed in the administrative law system include the conferral of information under the freedom of privacy legislation, human rights agencies, the review of the administrative tribunals, and review of the judicial courts. Administration law looks at the implications of three main groups which are the courts, executive, and a citizen. The three groups are directly involved in each of the administrative law dispute. They can either be the defendant, adjudicator or the ...

Probation, in the criminal justice context, is the period which a convicted person (probationer) is subjected to supervision, critical examination and intense evaluation. A judicial court is the only institution with the authority to order probation on a convict. Probation is ordered in lieu of incarceration. However, it does not mean that the convicted person is set free. An order of probation has conditions often imposed by a statute. It is given for rehabilitative purposes. However, the trial judge has the discretion to impose more conditions on a probation sentencing to meet the interests of the public and the offender. The conditions imposed ...

John Q. Student

“Can machines think?” – Alan Turing, 1950

This is the one question humans have been asking for decades (even centuries) and it is a topic which has been widely explored until this very moment. This question was posed by Alan Turing in his essay way back in the 1950s. As we all know, one core function of computers nowadays is to enable a systematic automation of processes. These processes pertain to tasks that used to be performed by humans manually. However, computers (and machines) have always worked in a fashion where people command every single move it makes, and therefore the computing world is posed with the ...

Research Paper: Religious Studies

Me
My teenage daughter became pregnant for a young gentleman who lied about his age, associations, immigration status, social life as well as his place of residence. I was never comfortable with this relationship since some of his values conflict with the Christian principles she was taught and the ones I am trying to uphold.
As such, the pregnancy was devastating to me. I felt violated as a parent from the perspective that this should not be happening to us. We love God; she grew up knowing the principles of truth and was offered perfect examples to make better ...

Almost US, but still Latin America. This is the brief definition one can give to Puerto Rico. US is actively engaged in cooperation with the archipelago, but the chances that this area ever really become an integral part of the United States are still unclear. More so, it is a unique habitat with its own unique development system, including the judiciary.
Puerto Rico is a dependent territory of the United States and has the status of "unincorporated organized territory”, which means that the area is under the control of the United States (and is not an integral part thereof), ...

Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC is a company that manufactures fluid sealing products used in the processing industry. The company employs more than1900 people, with 12 manufacturing facilities around the world (Garlock, 2013a). In the past, sealing gaskets for use with pipes moving steam or other heated materials were manufactured using asbestos to provide heat resistance to the seal. Workers exposed to asbestos in the workplace have a highly increased risk for mesothelioma, a type of lung cancer (Mayo Clinic, 2012). Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC has been involved in product liability suits related to the use of asbestos in their seals for 35 ...

Toward a Happy Medium: Maintaining Balance Between America’s Right to Liberty and Need for Security Through the Fourth Amendment

Abstract

The Fourth Amendment to the Constitution is near the heart of the American model of civil liberty. In no other amendment do the notions of liberty and security rest at such delicate legal counterpoints. Maintaining balance between the two is a constant challenge. Decisions in landmark cases in the last half of the 20th century helped to affirm important Fourth Amendment principles and protections concerning search and seizure, drug testing and probable cause. But in the post-9/11 world, Americans’ right to ...

[Professor]

Iran and Turkey are predominantly Islamic countries. Women since time immemorial share the same sentiments of male domination and severe violence and non-participation. On the other hand, both countries have women’s movements that are still in place up to this day. Both of the movements have ebbs and flows but they were able to withstand the wrath of patriarchy, and most importantly, they were able to fight back. From being marginalized and subjected to state fascism, women in Iran and Turkey are now enjoying some of the fruits of the long-running women’s movements. Their dreams of ...

Judgment in the case of Marbury v. Madison, often referred to as the most important in the history of the United States Supreme Court, has put into practice the principle of judicial review and the authority of the Supreme Court to recognize the constitutionality of both legislative and executive acts.
This case arose as a result of the political dispute that broke out after the presidential elections in 1800, when Democratic Republican Thomas Jefferson defeated the president of that time Federalist John Adams. In the final days of his being in office of the administration of Adams, Congress, in ...

Within

USA Correction System
Abstract
The principal objectives of punishment in the correction system of America are to prevent crimes and although it has the right objectives they are not working. The only objectives that work are incapacitation and deterrent and they only work because the culprits’ ability to commit crime is taken away.

Analysis of the Principal Objectives of Punishment within the USA Correction System

It does not matter how small a community is, one of the first item on its agenda after choosing its government, is an institution that represents law and order. In the United States there are different branches of the judiciary system; however they share the ...

Secretary of Labor v. Cities Service Oil Co.and theOccupational Safety & Health Review Commission

Introduction

This appeals court case is about five individuals – four employed by Cities Service Oil Co. and one employed by an independent contractor – of whom four died as a result of inhalation of hydrogen sulfide, while cleaning so-called water knockout tanks belonging to the oil company and located on the Stoltenberg lease near Holyrood, Kansas.
The case came to the appeals court because the Secretary of Labor petitioned for review of the original decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission which had issued citations and ...

The facts relating to Marbury were rather complex. During the elections of the year 1800, the organized Democratic-Republican Party led by Thomas Jefferson consequently defeated John Adams’ Federalist Party as it created a conclusive atmosphere of general political panic due to the overall aspects of lame duck Federalists. Within his final days of presidency, Adams made a number of appointments with a large number of justices for peace within the District of Columbia. Their commissions were eventually approved by the Senate as they were signed by the sitting president and later affixed with the government’s official seal. However, the commissions were ...

Habeas corpus is originally a Latin word that means that any government prisoner is entitled should have the right to challenge incarceration terms before a judge in a court of law. It is a legal procedure giving the suspect an undeniable right. The person who happens to be restraining another individual’s liberty is subjected to explain to the court why he/she is doing so. Without satisfactory reason for the restraint, the person is released. The term was mostly used in England simply as a subpoena. It has a rich history in England since it even precedes Magna Carta in 1215. The kings used it ...

Arguably, corruption is one of the global issues that have affected many countries. Corruption exists in both developing and developed nations, but the degree of its impacts varies. As a matter of fact, corruption affects social, political, and economic issues of a nation. In India, corruption is one of the domestic issues that have affected its economic development and growth. Due to its intensity and impacts on Indians the legislature, judicial, and executive institution has a role to play in eradicating the domestic issues. The issues of corruptions at its heights in India and institutions and stakeholders concerned have various roles to ...

In the court systems, various felonies are penalized following the court's guidelines. There are a variety of particulars that go into a sentencing pronouncement. An individual who commits a financial fraud may go to jail for a longer period, compared to someone who commits murder, as is the case of Bernard Madoff, who went to jail for 150 years for committing financial crime and Karla Homolka was sentenced to 12 years in prison for murder. It is, however, clear that an extensive range of verdicts are not necessarily rational to the victims or the scam culprits. This paper looks ...

Law

ASSIGNMENT ONE:Memorandum
RE: Employer-employee relationship between Mel and Alice
The issue in this case is whether there was an employer-employee relationship that existed between Mel and Alice that will meet the criteria established in Amarnare.
In this given case, Alice was hired by Ex-See-Lindt Staffing to work as a temporary legal secretary at Mel’s Law Offices, but she was being paid by Ex-See-Lindt. However, Alice got her hours, assignments, and training from Mel’s and was required by Ex-See-Lindt to report to work each day in a timely manner. She was informed that she will get paid ...

A federal act of congress can be used to refer to the common laws formulated and enacted by the congress in the United States. The laws endorsed could either be common or public depending on how they will relate to the people and their effects. If a law is termed as public, then it applies to every individual in the country and no one is considered to be above the law in this case. On the other hand, private statues relate to explicit rules that apply to a particular group of people (Jensen, J. 2006). For instance, a group of certain professionals ...

Introduction

The Muslim Brotherhood refers to the transnational political and religious group that was created in Egypt by the Islamic scholar Hassan al-Banna on the basis of the belief that Islam is a way of life and not simply a religion. Banna was opposed to the Western concepts of democracy and justice. He considered the imitation of Western customs sacrilegious. Therefore, he founded this organization to unite the believers of Islam from all across the world into the bond of brotherhood and liberate Egypt from the bondage of Western influences (Jones and Cullinane 2013). By definition, democracy refers to a form of secular ...

Abstract

Alternative dispute resolution has been hailed by many people for the crucial role it plays in finding solutions to disputes outside the courtroom. By definition, arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution technique that takes place out of the legal courts. In this kind of dispute resolution, a third party reviews the facts and evidence of two parties and imposes a legally binding decision. The fact that the parties to a dispute have total control over the process makes it more admirable as compared to the judicial process. The parties have the ability to make their own schedules and choose the arbitrators. For a ...

Thesis: The Death Penalty is not fair because innocent people are convicted, some have been almost executed, some have been executed and exculpatory evidence was discovered post execution and some have been executed despite of exculpatory evidence. The high cost of prosecuting Death Penalty cases reflects this.

INTRODUCTION I In spite of far reaching ramifications many states in America still apply and carry out the Death Sentence.

A. The Death Sentence is obtained and carried out inconsistently.
B. Death Sentence cases cost much more to prosecute than those of life without parole because of the finality of the sentence.

BODY

II Death Sentence cases create situations where innocent people can be executed, or wait for years on “Death Row” ...

England is a constituent country of the larger United Kingdom. The other countries that constitute the United Kingdom include Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The latter three are mere devolved administrations of the larger United Kingdom. This paper would, however, limit itself to England which is fully under the charge of the United Kingdom led by the institution of the Monarch. It should be noted that the Monarchial system of governance in England essentially rests within the Parliamentary system of governance bases on the Westminster model. England, therefore, does not practice absolute Monarchial systems but rather practices a parliamentary monarchial government ...

Lynn University

In the world today there are many issues that need to be addressed. Some issues are more prevalent than others and some are easier to solve. One issue that while not easily solvable which needs to be addressed far more seriously on the world stage, is that of equal rights for women in particular equal pay for women. (Hartman et al., 3). Throughout history women's wages have been much lower as compared to their male counterparts. In the 1960’s that difference was 40.2 percent according to the U.S National Equal Pay Task Force in 2013, while in 2013 ...