Dicey was an incredibly important figure in the development of the Rule of Law in contemporary Britain. The Rule of Law, in a modern context, has been developed through many different societies; however, the liberal understanding of the role of government and law in British society today is very much the result of Dicey’s philosophical input. Dicey suggested that individuals cannot be punished in any way unless they have committed some sort of transgression against a law that has been established by the rightful government and Courts in the realm. Dicey also suggested that an important characteristic of ...
Doctrine College Essays Samples For Students
Regardless of how high you rate your writing abilities, it's always an appropriate idea to check out a competently written College Essay example, especially when you're dealing with a sophisticated Doctrine topic. This is precisely the case when WowEssays.com collection of sample College Essays on Doctrine will come in useful. Whether you need to think up a fresh and meaningful Doctrine College Essay topic or survey the paper's structure or formatting peculiarities, our samples will provide you with the necessary material.
Another activity area of our agency is providing practical writing support to students working on Doctrine College Essays. Research help, editing, proofreading, formatting, plagiarism check, or even crafting completely unique model Doctrine papers upon your request – we can do that all!
Question: Write an Essay on The Fairness Doctrine.
Discuss its origins and its demise
The Fairness Doctrine originates from a premise that radio broadcasters should not just present one side of any controversial issue. The doctrine was not formalized until 1941, but the FCC did go ahead and revoke the licenses of several licenses for being ‘unfair’ in the way they presented controversial issues (Sandman et al. 1972). Sandman records that there was even a radio station that lost its license just for running editorials. When the Fairness Doctrine was formalized in 1941, these are the major principles that were crystallized, as recorded by Sandman (1972):
...
Under the leadership of President, Dwight Eisenhower, the United States developed the need to use military action to prevent the spread and impact of communism or any other radical movements. Eisenhower used the doctrine that asserts that use nukes and spooks to prevent communists or any other radical takeovers. The doctrine was created after the U.S had realized that is was likely for a global takeover by communists. President Eisenhower had massive military experience in military action, and he knew the importance and effectiveness of military action when an impactful intervention was required (Jones, 2008).
At the time of ...
Following the guidelines of course ID guidelinesStudent’s nameUniversity
Introduction
In this paper a brief description of employment-at-will doctrine has been presented to show how a Chief Operating Officer can tackle a number of personnel problems of an organization with the help of a number of ethical theories and ethical consideration. As the Chief Operating Officer a number of scenarios have to be dealt with where one can find unethical use of empowerment with the employees to force them to leave the job. Therefore it is the duty of Chief Operating Officer to investigate such unethical scenarios to make correct decisions whether the employment-at-will doctrine has been breached ...
Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy
Current Events and U.S. Diplomacy
Presidential doctrines can be described as the main attitudes, goals and stances, which the various presidents of the United States outline for the foreign affairs. As one continues to study the presidential doctrines, they realize that most of the presidential doctrines are somewhat related and linked to the cold war (Rossides, Academy of Political Science and Conference, 1998).
The presidential doctrines, in a summation, can be understood better as items and ideologies that completely characterized the foreign policy of a number of United States’ presidents (Ray, 2004). They are ...
The writ of habeas corpus is one of the major developments that brought significant transformations in law. “habeas corpus” is a doctrine that is based on the argument that an individual should not be unlawfully detained. According to Anderson (2006), the doctrines states that “the prisoner or detainee should be brought before the court to decide on the lawfulness of a person’s detention or imprisonment”. The doctrine is has been used in regular occasions in various countries. In the United States, habeas corpus can be used by the federal courts to determine the validity of a prisoner’s ...
In the case of Bart, he has the right to file claims against his employer Bill, Barney and Ruby for damages. In the case of Bill, he is liable under the doctrine of promissory estoppel known as “detrimental reliance” where an individual who has reasonably and substantially relied on the promise of another can acquire some measure of recovery (Miller, 2013, p. 173). The doctrine of promissory estoppel permits a party to recover a promise even if the same was made without any consideration in order to promote the interest of equity and justice by enforcing the contractual obligations. ...
Professional Learning Resource For Religious Educators In Australian Catholic Schools Essays Example
Introduction
This Learning Resource has been designed for Educators in Catholic Schools in Australia that will be working with both Primary and Secondary Students. It aims to give an overview of the different aspects that have been influencing the teaching of the Catholic faith along the years, especially the last centuries previous 1980s, in particular the influence pre and pro Second Vatican Council. Religious Education teachers should find this learning resource useful to identify where they are in time, in the Church, in the world, and in particular in Australia within the Catholic Church. They will be able to understand ...
INTRODUCTION
The concept of federal sovereign immunity is anchored on the sovereign immunity doctrine. This doctrine provides that the federal government cannot be sued unless it has given explicit permission to be sued. The concept, whether applying to the state or federal government, has been assailed for its contradicting tension with constitutionalism - a legal principle that exists to limit governmental powers vis-à-vis fundamental rights of individuals (Sisk 74). Jackson (2003), thus, noted that the concept is a “place of contest between the values of Constitutionalism” with limiting governmental powers, on one hand, and judicial hesitance brought about by ...
Introduction
Over the years, Catholic Church has undergone several changes, although the most significant being the changes brought by Vatican II. Arguably, Vatican II changes brought forth doctrines that the Catholic Church initially believed and taught its members. Worth noting, the changes brought forth “new Catholic Church”. This change is mostly attributed to the Vatican Council II that represented Vatican II, which was dogmatic as compared to other Vatican councils that were pastoral (Lopez & Julian, 2013). This changes not only affected Catholic Church members, but also the Protestants, and was led by Pope John XXIII.
First, the mode of mass ...
Abstract
Calvin’s doctrine is an exposition of the question whether free will exists. If an all-powerful God can see the future and determine the future, how can free will actually exist? This paper analyses the Calvin doctrine and the Roman Catholic doctrines in regards to free will. Calvin doctrine will be demonstrated to root for the stance that God predestines the people who will have eternal life, or rather picks them. Roman Catholicism on the other hand propounds that free will plays a great role in determining an individual’s spiritual outcome.
The question posed by Calvin is almost ...
One of the cornerstones of the UK Constitution is parliamentary sovereignty. Parliamentary sovereignty makes the UK parliament the supreme legal authority in the country that is charged with the role of creating or ending laws. The parliament sovereignty doctrine has stood for a considerable period in the UK constitution. Although it has managed to stand solidly, some constitutional developments have, however affected this sovereignty. The parliament has itself passed some laws that have limited the application of this principle. These laws have been a reflection of the political developments both within and outside the United Kingdom. The aim of ...
The Cold War and U.S. Diplomacy
United States Diplomacy
Introduction
The Cold War is a state political balance and military competition among that barricade short of all-out war.America’s power to act by promoting its acceptance and moral beliefs to citizens of the other countries, so called as public diplomacy. The commanders of America must tie in competition on the country’s instructional action during the Cold War to amateur the infrastructure for the next creation of public diplomacy.During the presidential administration, an agreement system was arranged to examine the extent of socialist government around the world. The U.S. started a large ...
Good Example Of Essay On Liberalism, Foreign Policy And Nation-Building In The US Since World War II
The US revolution and absolute independence did not come cheap. It came as a result of the immense sacrifices, determination and war waged by Americans with the colonial masters. Of course, there were oppositions, several factors set the pace for the revolution and the creation of the United States of America. A number of documents and early thinkers had influential effects in the drafting of the American Declaration of Independence. The writings of Thomas Hobbes can be classified among these early literatures that helped shaped the revolution, although with some exceptions. In the book, Leviathan, Thomas Hobbes argued that ...
Arguably, the Truman doctrine occurs as one of the most widely discussed topics in the field of History. Amicably, this doctrine was solely initiated to curb the spread of totalitarian communism, which was advocated considerably by the Soviet Union. To be precise, this doctrine was initiated in the period preceding the Second World War, which had seen the emergence of the United States and Soviet Union as the major superpowers. After the war, the Soviet Union propelled its quests in advocating for communism across various states. This was not received warmly by the United States, and this prompted the ...
Explain the Buddhist Anatta (no-self) doctrine and discuss whether it is compatible with the Buddhist doctrine of rebirth. What difficulties might the combination of these two doctrines generate?
Buddhism is one of the oldest religions in the world. Christianity is younger on five centuries, while Islam formed twelve centuries after it. Buddhism has created a unique culture, having first appeared more than two and a half thousand years ago in India as a religious philosophical teaching. Buddhism can be seen as a religion, philosophy, ideology. It is a cultural complex, a certain way of life, and a path of ...
DOCTRINE OF THE MEAN
The doctrine of the mean is a book that describes the teachings of Confucian in china. Confucian was taught by a philosopher known as Confucius. Confucianism describes the Chinese traditional culture and outlines the social, ethical and philosophical approach. Confucianism was developed from Analects, a book written after the death of Confucius. The content of Analects is attributed to Confucius grandson called Zisi which meant Kong Ji in Chinese. Confucian teachings taught about the rites, virtues and duty that a leader should have so as to be a good role model with good morals. The doctrine of the mean ...
(Insert Instructor)
(Insert Course)
(Insert Date)
Different ideas have emerged regarding the society and acceptable behaviors in the same. Such ideas have since been adopted into said societies with some being the views of individuals and others originating from thoughts of governance and societal correlation. The Doctrine of Fascism and the English Bills of Rights are both ideas and regulations regarding communities but originating from very different sources. This is so in the sense that, while the Doctrine of Fascism originated from the ideas of one person, the Bill of Rights passed through Congress before its adoption. However, as ...
United States of America had long followed a policy of isolation throughout the 18th and 19th century. The policy continued even in the earlier part of twentieth century when the First World War was fought. The event of disapproval of Woodrow Wilson’s fourteen points by Senators back home defined the overall outlook and aptitude of the Senators and American people outside the country. This defined the foreign policy of United States of America as well.
However towards the middle of Second World War United States of America was forced into reverting its policy of isolation. The Second World ...
In the following essay, I would like to explain the key provisions of the doctrine of the separation of powers, as well as to demonstrate how that doctrine operates within the system of Australia`s public law.
- Separation of powers doctrine
Separation of powers is a political and legal theory, according to which the government should be divided between three independent branches: legislative, executive and judicial. The differentiation between these powers prevents possible abuse of power and the emergence of a despotic regime where no individual freedom is possible. Each of the three authorities performs its inherent tasks ...
Generally speaking, the doctrine of eminent domain relates to the power of the sovereign (or government) to acquire private property (Paul, 34). The government can exercise the power itself or delegate it to its assigns. Other terms used synonymous to it include appropriation, condemnation, compulsory purchase/acquisition, and expropriation. The underlying philosophy of the doctrine is that the government requires the property for public use. The doctrine has a long history and as will be demonstrated, it has changed over time and to some extent deviated from its original intent. These changes have elicited scholarly views as to the necessity ...
Biblical Inspiration
Biblical Inspiration refers to a doctrine in Christian Theology that makes a claim that the editors and the authors of the Christian bible were influenced or led by God in writing the scriptures such that these writings may be taken to be the word of God Himself. The bible contains a lot of passages and verses in which the writers claim that they were divinely inspired by God when writing their messages (Vanhoozer, 34). For instance, one of the most common phrases in the bible is “Thus says the Lord” which seems to indicate that the authors of the ...
A first look at nature shows us the existence of corporeal substances and the universal presence of change. We see that all bodily substances, whether living or not, are subject to generation and corruption. Every change has a starting point and a terminal point. As regards substantial changes, the terminal point is what determines its nature. Aristotle calls this terminal point as the form, understood not in the geometric sense, but as that, which determines the nature of the substance. The substantial form is the reality or perfection produced in any substantial change. Aside from the form, a substrate ...
“Since the effect of frustration is to kill the contract and discharge the parties from further liability under it, the doctrine is not to be lightly invoked, must be kept within very narrow limits and ought not to be extended,” Bingham LJ, Lauritzen. The obiter by the Lord Justice informs the subject of this paper’s discussion. The paper seeks to examine the spirit and the letter of the law in the application of the doctrine of frustration of contract. The paper assumes a legal character that would include consideration of common law approach, statutes and case laws. In ...
Abstract
This paper puts Everyman in the wider context of medieval drama and discusses the ubiquity of memento mori in medieval culture – in the visual arts and in drama. It goes on to examine the ways in which is presented as the catalyst for all the vents in t he play and demonstrates that the presentation of Death i s wholly consistent with Catholic doctrine – which is also examined in full. Death’s interaction in the play with God and with Everyman is examined and finally there is reference to Shakespeare and his alleged debt to the Morality play tradition.
Key words: Death, mortality, catholic doctrine, Good Deeds, repentance, dance of death, Morality Plays
...
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
DIVISION FOUR
189 Cal.App.4th 1155 (2010)
117 Cal. Rptr. 3d 126
MICHAEL HOWE,
Plaintiff and Appellant.
vs.
SEVEN FORTY TWO COMPANY, INC.,
Defendant and Respondent.
Facts
On the 26th June 2008, the Plaintiff/Appellant, Michael Howe, suffered injuries when he fell off the ground after sitting on a counter stool at a restaurant owned by the Defendant/Respondent. Each of the seven counter stools in the restaurant was fastened to a metal base that was fixed onto a raiser that was fastened to the ground. Ever chair was fastened onto the metal base using three wood screws. The screws to the chair that the Plaintiff sat on were ...
“For the time being and notwithstanding the various challenges to it parliamentary sovereignty remains formally intact as a matter of law.” Discuss the above statement. What is the significance of parliamentary sovereignty to the UK constitution and has the doctrine has been weakened by constitutional changes?
Introduction
The principle of Parliamentary sovereignty is based on the notion that Parliament represents the will of the people. The courts have upheld the view of the sovereignty in the past more than 350 years. The above statement in the title refers to the dilution of the concept of Parliamentary sovereignty with the advent ...
Abstract
The aim of Bodhisattva is to reach Awakening and self-realization. The state of self-realization means feeling pure compassion towards all beings. The purpose of the essay is to look at the different perspectives of Bodhisattva and the true meaning of Sanskrit word. The paper essentially demonstrates the dynamics of the bodhisattva's carrier and the wisdom for the practical life, and how its meaning has evolved over time.
Introduction
Bodhisattva is a Sanskrit word made of two words - “Bodhi” that means enlightenment and “sattva” which means being. Looking back in the early Buddhism, as well as some later traditions in ...
No one needs to be an expert in film analysis to observe then conclude that Babette’s Feast, which was directed by Gabriel Axel and was released for public viewing in 1987, could qualify as a religious film, is about fine cuisine, or religious awakening. The reason behind such analysis is that the film revolves around the life of two religiously devote woman and the small community that they preside, and the central event is a feast of fine cuisine. Nevertheless, it takes a much deeper analysis in order to realize that Babette’s Feast is more than just ...
A. Poland and the Cold War
Soviet troops occupied Poland at the end of World War II. Future elections in Poland were one of the subjects at the Yalta Conference in 1945. Josef Stalin was not enthusiastic about the prospect of free elections in Poland. Because of the violence committed by the Soviets against the Polish people during the war, there was a great deal of animosity between Russians and Poles. Stalin assumed that if Poles had their choice in free elections, they would not be voting in favor of the current communist administration in the Soviet Union. Poland and the Soviet Union had been ...
Biblical World view Competences
Religion and spirituality are core aspects of many people around the world. Christian faith has a powerful influence in the world today. At the core of the Christian faith is the belief that God made humans in his own image. This doctrine affects how religious counselors interact with Christians and non-Christians. Incorporating this belief in religious counseling helps achieve therapeutic goals faster than eradicating or avoiding the doctrine.
Religious counselors face different scenarios depending on the client’s professed faith. Clients may hold the Christian doctrine as their spirituality or their religion. According to literature, spirituality focuses on the ...
First, the professor defines what a democracy is. A democracy he says is a government by the people. Meaning, it is the majority opinion that matters in a democracy. There are two kinds of democracies, the direct democracy and the representative democracy. The American Democracy is the representative type. Therefore, it is called a republic. Before a republic comes into place, people with similar interests come together to form it. This is where we get our first doctrine in the American constitution, which is meant to limit power for the general purpose of advancing human freedom. To fully understand ...
Utilitarianism as defined by John Mill is a theory that is based on the principles that stipulate,“One’s actions are correct in proportion to their tendency of promoting happiness and wrong if they tend to result into sadness.” According to John Stuart Mill,happiness is the lack of pain and a state of pleasure. He claims that pleasure can vary in quantity and quality. He adds that the pleasures that are implanted in someone’s upper faculties should be treated with increased weight than the lower pleasures. Mill says that people’s accomplishment of ends and goals, for ...
Introduction
Theologically speaking, the nature or concept of God and beliefs or practices differ based on religious doctrine. In some cases, some religious groups base or borrow their doctrines on established ones or from known mythological narratives. This is especially true for cult groups that establish their significance on symbolism that is familiar to most people. Heaven’s Gate set an example because it is a cult that formulated its doctrines from pre-established canons such as those found in the Holy Bible infused with elements of science fiction. The result of which is a reinterpretation of the Bible within the ...
Plato and Aristotle, along with the first great philosopher Socrates, are considered to be the founders of all philosophical concepts and the top of Greek philosophy. They developed such philosophical systems that lately found a number of adherents, and even nowadays famous philosophers apply to the classic works of Plato and Aristotle since after these Greek authors there were not any fundamentally new ideas in philosophical studies. However, the difference between Plato’s and Aristotle’s views is significant; even though Plato laid the foundation of many political, social thoughts and the theory of Ideas, they were criticized by ...
Introduction:
Since it became an independent country in 1953, North Korea or the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea has been subjected to heavy scrutiny by the international community. The isolated country has always been reported to pressure South Korea into breaking the détente, continue production of its nuclear weaponry and recently, declare war against the United States. While the international community wishes to influence North Korea’s actions, the fact the country is isolated and information is very scarce makes the issue difficult to resolve. If the international community acted haphazardly towards the issue, North Korea may take ...
The Evolution of US Federalism
US federalism has been in a persistent state of evolution throughout the US history. This evident by the continuing changes in the way the term is being interpreted. Three examples of these changes can be gleaned from the meaning given to the term during the following eras: prior to the Civil War with the nullification doctrine, the period between the Civil War and the 1930s with the dual federalism, and contemporary times that saw the rise of modern federalism.
The nullification doctrine emerged during the time of Jefferson and Madison. The two initially proposed the doctrine to object to ...
In every event, issue or controversy, it is noticeable that the United States of America possibly finds itself included one way or the other. As the most influential and powerful country in the globe, Americans would argue that these events and issues would likely affect the country even if affected countries or sectors did not call for American involvement. Some people would accept America’s involvement due to the country’s overall capacity and influence while others would be weary for the possible intentions of the Americans in the issue. However, America was not always this active in international, ...
Issue
The issue is whether Barry can insist on the existence of the contract for renewal of his employment and, if not, whether he can rely on promissory estoppel. Another issue in the following case is whether Barry has a right to receive promised bonus.
In common law contract can be defined as legally binding agreement between two or more competent parties. In order for a contract to be valid, it has to contain necessary elements – offer and acceptance, consideration and legal intention of the parties to enter into a contract. Even if one of those elements is missing, an ...
Explication of the text
De Anima II (1) is arguably one of Aristotle’s most renowned explanations of philosophical thought. Aristotle’s explanations of form and substance are arguably amongst the most potent solutions to the body-mind problem. According to Aristotle, a student of Plato, the body and the soul are not one and the same thing. On the contrary, the body and the soul are independent of one another, and the combination of the two makes up an animal. What Aristotle says is that the body is the subject matter, while the soul is the essence. The soul is what makes a ...