Dispute Critical Thinkings Samples For Students

Alternative Dispute Resolution

The future of the law is unpredictable and uncertain in character. This could be partially explained by the dynamic nature of events and factors which cumulatively fails to predict with future development and or trajectory of the law. However, over and above the normal practise, a lot of changes have been seen that point to a direction towards alternative dispute resolutions in the solution of problems and situations. In the modern divide, the increased costs of litigation, the formality of the legal system coupled with the time consuming nature of litigation is slowly compelling persons into using other avenues for the ...

Human Resource Management

Comparison among San Francisco, Las Vegas and New York’s Provisions on Grievance Procedures
A grievance can simply be defined as a concern, complaint or problem related to the working environment. Due to the diversity at the workplace, people have different beliefs, opinions and thoughts about how to approach work and as a result they often have grievances relating to issues that arise from the workplace procedures. The Las Vegas collective bargaining agreement defines a grievance as a dispute or a difference of opinion between the employer and the Union with regard to the meaning, interpretation and application of ...

Issues in Management: Critical Thinking Workplace Dispute Analysis

Issues in Management: Critical Thinking Workplace Dispute Analysis

Introduction

Cogent, critical thinking in role-playing skills assist managers in maintaining salubrious workplace conditions. This exercise assesses an application to the problem of Lauren’s case study in figuring out what happened, and remedy a dispute arising in the office. The framework for arriving at a decision rests upon four key steps, which include the following: (a) identify, (b) gather/analyze, (c) consider options, and (d) develop well-reasoned ideas. Besides the buzzword of ‘sustainability,’ perhaps the most often discussed business topics revolve around issues of ethics and communications – which often arise in the ...

The business environment is characterized with various complex business activities and processes that result to conflicts. For example, the most prevalent conflict concept in most of the organization around the globe is the conflict between an organization and the unions of workers. This is based on various employees’ conditions and terms such the enumerations among other factors. However, there are various other conflicts that arise from the business activities and processes like competing firms that lead to the formation of cartels, conflicts on prices with suppliers, among others (Deutsch Coleman & Marcus 2011, p. 26). Resolution of conflicts involves a complex ...

Robert and Denise are going through a very difficult time and it seems clear that intervention is needed. Of all the methods of ADR, facilitative mediation seems to be the most appropriate course of action. Through mediation, Robert and Denise will be helped to communicate effectively and slowly work through their various issues. Whether or not the couple reconcile their marriage, they are likely to have to remain in contact for the sake of their children. Therefore, they will need to find a way of communicating with each other in the long run, and mediation will be a valuable first step in ...

Analysis of the Accident on the Job

2016-07-29
Analysis of the Accident on the Job

Introduction

This paper is aimed to analyze the problem of industrial accident in the production shop. The main goal of the paper is to analyze issues, possible solutions and propose the most appropriate decision. During the task, I have analyzed the accident presented in the case study as several outside resources (information that is presented on the website of the OSHA) related to the topic.
It should be noted that problem of safety at the workplace remains relevant for the majority of the companies. It can be explained by the human factor ...

1. Why Unions started the industrial action
Unions represent and lobby for better rights, wages and benefits for the workers. In this Qantas case, the unions jointly represented engineers, pilots, ground staff, and baggage handlers who wanted a pay rise. The Unions started an industrial action because they felt that the workers did not get the pay they deserved. Firstly, other pilots in other companies were being paid highly as compared to the pilots that worked at Qantas. For instance, in every 28 days Virgin pilots were paid 18 hours more than their counterparts were at Qantas. Secondly, Qantas ...

Introduction

The research paper is about the opinions of 13-15 year old children who are pupils in a special school for children with difficulties in learning in the city of London Brahm, 1997). The paper is written by Brahm Norwich of the department of Psychology and Special Needs Group in the Institute of Education, London University. His address is 25 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0AA, UK. The paper takes into account the children’s views on integration and special schoolings, whether they had had tension in their opinions about special schooling relative to any stigma, perceptions about continuity of self, change ...

Healthcare is comprised of players from diverse fields and backgrounds. Collaboration between patients, family, coworkers, employer, and employee is crucial for improved service delivery. The use of dispute resolution mechanisms and programs has been developed to inject hope into hospitals and clinics. Through enhanced teaching and training, health workers will be at a better position to handle patients, co-workers, family and employer.
Through provision of training and education for health care professionals such as educational forums for licensed providers cultivates a platform for more intense learning outside the clinical environment. Continuity education is conducted in conferences, workshops, CE centers. Additional ...

In the medical environs, caregivers and families need to make various decisions concerning the health and care of patients. The approach of tackling these medical situations is often crucial which affirms the need for a bioethics mediator. Bioethics mediation is an integrated medical process involved in resolving dilemmas on the proper ethical procedures in health care institutions. It requires a bioethics mediator with skills in interpersonal communication, dispute resolution, listening and emotional intelligence who is responsible for assisting health practitioners, patients and families resolve their disagreements. In the case study, although an agreement was reached at the end, the bioethics mediator ...

- Equality issues that trade unions should address
Promotion of equality at the work place is one of the key functions of trade unions. The main priorities that trade unions bargain on are pay packages that are offered to workers and the terms and conditions under which the workers carry out their duties. The framework that governs the employer regulation has been strengthened over in the years in countries such the United Kingdom, United States of America and Denmark; it is often the prerogative of the employers to interpret the statute law. The trade unions are a powerful force ...

The Hollow Crown Film is basically a series which is based on the Shakespeare’s second teratology named the Henriad. This includes Richard II, Henry IV, Part 2 and Henry V. the most basic analysis gathered from watching the series concludes that it is based on the political scenarios of England in Shakespearean era. There are many references made by the author which have been convincingly portrayed in the film series (PBS).
As The Hollow Crown begins with Richard II, the film takes the reader back in time when King Richard II tries to solve things for his cousin ...

CHAPTER 4PART I4. How can critical thinkers counteract confirmation bias?

A critical thinker should seek information from different sources. An issue at hand is considered from different perspectives and using Six Thinking Hats technique.5 What is an expert?
An expert is a person who can acquire evidence and information that are superior to those of an ordinary person. 6 What should be our attitude toward a claim that conflicts with the expert opinion?
The claim that is inconsistent with the expert advice should not shut down the possibilities that the allegations are untrue. As the law may require we may be forced or use personal intuition to judge between ...

A critical scenario about the dispute between Mr. Scott Sidell and his company, Structured Settlement Investments (SSI), will be discussed in this paper. The case has been contested in the court, and different people formed varying points of view about this. The ethical and professional issues that this case brings into question will also be discussed in this paper.
It seems very unethical for the company to go through Sidell’s emails on his personal email account i.e. Yahoo! Account without his permission. Though his email was open on that computer, ethics does not require ruining someone's privacy. Ethically, ...

The book offers diverse tools to identify loopholes in an argument which will be utilized to address the arguments in the howling man. In the Howling Man episode, the imprisoned devil claims that he has been imprisoned against his will by the members of the hermitage, while the conclusion drawn is that the members of the hermitage are mad and insane. Alternatively, the same arguments can also be presented as the claim that the members of the hermitage are made and insane leading to the conclusion that they have imprisoned an innocent person (devil) through an irrational act. Brother ...

Question 1

First, the meaning of a statute must be established. This must be done from the language in which it is outlined. To begin with, it is the duty of the judges to give effects and ascertain the intent of the legislature in approving the statute from the language because this could ease their efforts of deriving the legislative’s intent behind the statute. In cases where the legislative intent is apparent from the statute language, the judges have a duty to apply the laws on its face without using case law to determine the purpose and intent of the statute. Conversely, ...

A THEOLOGICAL BOOK CRITIQUE

A Theological Book Critique
Of the Requirements for the Course
[XXX]

Day Month Year

Introduction. 3
Summary Critique 3
Critical Interaction 5
Jesus always alive 5
Jesus knew he was God 7
Conclusion 8
Introduction
How God Became Jesus: The Real Origins of the Belief in Jesus’ Divinity is a collection of disputations against Bart D. Ehrman’s How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee. Ehrman is an American New Testament scholar and professor of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Michael F. Bird, an ...

A review of the relationship between the church and state, especially during the medieval period, gives us an insight on the tug of war that existed between the two institutions and how both tried to win over the lives of people during that period in history. Furthermore, the relationship of these two institutions gives us an idea on how to understand Western traditional of government as a whole. From the 11th to the 14th century, Europe was in an uneasy state. These were centuries marked by conflict and warfare both within the kingdoms and outside the borders that a serious effect ...

Question one

If the agents of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) were to walk into Skywalker’s store and arrest him, it is our argument that the EPA can neither fine nor jail him for the alleged violation of the law. In answering this question in the negative, much consideration has been given to the wording and the text of the legal provisions creating the offence. It is my submission that there is no disclosure of an offence known to law as to attract any legal sanctions. In particular, the law stipulates that all glass top coffee tables are banned in ...

Business

Contract Analysis
Introduction
People have a usual misconception that contracts are the same as agreements; the only difference is that when an agreement encompasses enforceability by law when is it becomes a contract. The provisions of the law in which the five essential elements should exist in order to consider its validity bind contracts. An enforceable contract must demonstrate offer and acceptance, legal objective, mutual obligations, consideration and competent parties. These elements will be explored by analyzing an actual contract and determine whether it constitutes all the aforementioned elements. For this analysis, the sampled contract will be an actual ...

ABSTRACT

Euthyphro is not really able to answer any of the questions Socrates asks about piety and holiness, since he is looking for a universal answer about the meaning of these terms. Socrates probably does not believe in the traditional gods of Athens but rather in a monotheistic God with a universal concept of truth, justice and morality. Indeed, he is about to go on trial for impiety and instructing the youth of Athens to question the existence of the gods, and will be sentenced to death. In comparison, Euthyphro has very rigid and limited ideas about holiness, which generally involve obeying laws, ...

Introduction

Employment tribunals have come a long way since their inception, not only in scope but also in philosophy. The idea that they should hear claims in an atmosphere far removed from the courtroom, accessibly, informally, speedily, and cheaply, no longer pertains as much as it once did. This study examines the extent to which employment tribunals in the UK fit for the purpose in meeting the needs of both aggrieved employees and employers. The study further recommends reforms for improving employment tribunals. The study traces the growth and change of employment tribunals in UK for the past five decades. These ...

Management: When a New Leader Takes Charge

Most people spend up to a third of their adult life at work therefore the topic on workplace issues and conflicts draws lots of attentions from the management of organizations. More often than not, conflict arises when two or more personalities clash, employee dissatisfactions and failure to progress or get promoted and also due to conflict of interest among the team members. Conflicts are usually long term resulting from a continuous situation. This is different from a dispute which occurs once or twice and isn’t ongoing. However disputes will lead into a conflict if left unsolved. Unsolved dispute is the perfect ingredient ...

ALJ (Administrative law judge) REQUIREMENTS

First, an applicant for the post of ALJ must be a licensed lawyer and have experience for at least seven years in practice. Second, one must pass the OPM administrative law judge examination to qualify for an ALJ position. Those are the most necessary formally set standards for ALJ. However, there are other minor details that are expected from a candidate. The minor details at some point are extremely helpful and promote the candidate score when there is high competition for vacant posts of ALJ. The minor details are in relation to personal image and presentation. When the judges are through ...

Affiliation

Team Work

Team work is an effort of a group of individuals who come together with an aim of facing a common situation and tackling the task towards success. This requires that each team member be ready to lead and also prepare to be lead at one point or another. It requires an overall group focus on the common mission to override the individual goals of each member. Therefore, at some point, everyone has to sacrifice for the rest of the members (Parker, 2011).
As the Direct Superior in a giant technological company having a new product manufacture assignment scheduled for launching ...