Theology Case Studies Samples For Students

The contract entered by the 17-year-old son, who is a minor with Don is voidable. The contract can be invalidated on the ground that the contract of sale that was entered between him and Don can be annulled since the son is only a minor and he was not the designated representative of the company. Hence, once the contract is nullified, the effect is that it is as if there is no agreement at all. This is due to the fact that the minor cannot represent the company since there is no board resolution to empower him to enter the contract.

...

Abstract

The God squad group, mainly made of boys in junior and senior years, uses the 9/11 attacks as a rallying point for combination of white supremacist, racist, anti-Semitic, ant-Islamic, anti-immigrant, ant-gay, nee-fascist dogma mixed with a good dose of anti-abortion and fundamentalist Christian diatribe. The group catches the attention of the administration when they show up at school all wearing their uniforms and distributes the first edition of their weekly "newsletter". The” newsletter” contains highly offensive diatribes on how it is the "the duty of all true Americans to fight against the forces trying to destroy our country". The ...

In the contemporary world, the concept of religion is more specialized and diverse among varied religious affiliation. Therefore, various forums for philosophical discussion have come up with dissimilar ideas centered on religion. The intent of this thesis is to respond to a series of questions concerning religion.

- What is the doctrine of divine simplicity?

The doctrine of divine simplicity God is simply outlined as a supreme being that lacks distinct metaphysical parts, constituents, or properties. Rather, God is given special attributes such as holiness, goodness, merciful, etc. Therefore, God is divine hence can only be attributed to his greatness, power, and wisdom.

- Can we make sense of the idea that perfect goodness is identical to perfect power?

God is actually a definition of the ...

Yes, Milton’s Paradise Lost is an epic poem. First criterion of an epic poem is related to its magnitude, it should be long spreading over hundreds of verses, and Paradise lost, certainly, fulfills that requirement. Following the norms of epic poetry, Milton describes his Paradise Lost in the style of a narration. Secondly, an epic poem usually revolves around the life events of a hero, and some critics contend that Milton projects Satin as the protagonist of his poem. Another characteristic of an epic poem is that it begins in the midst of an ongoing story, and later, the reader ...

Introduction

Faith City is a city focused on its commitment to preserve and further improve the historical landmarks in its area of coverage. It wants to be able to exhibit human diversity and the city’s history while also aiming to increase the city’s income through tourism. The Faith City Government’s main partner in realizing this objective is Our Landmark Town, a non-profit organization. Our Landmark Town is currently operating under federal funds and through individual and corporate donations. However, its Director, Mr. Johnson, is currently retiring and has only devoted a period of two weeks to turnover his post and ...

- Internalism is a thesis founded on knowledge belief or it is justified faith intertwined with knowledge and concerns itself with the basis of that faith. Chisholm assertion that, alternatives to internalism are founded on true or false belief or are informed by non externalist considerations is true.
This is because, internalism postulates that, an individual is capable of accessing the foundations of his or her knowledge while it’s alternative externalism is a informed by convictions that founded on perceptions and faith which lack consistency as well as verification per se (Chisholm, 2008). In addition
- Explanation of ...

Nowadays, religion is the fundamental part in our culture. The question is, where did it came from, and what is its nature? Experience can explain this idea, first by considering the Stone Age people. Their minds gathered empirical realities necessary for survival and they did the best they could in drawing conclusions about the world beyond them. They call themselves “the people” and thought that strangers are creatures of another sort, less human than they are. With no defined difference between spirit and materiality, they believed that in preserving a corpse helps to preserve the spirit of the one who ...

The Great Atlantic Railroad Company problem

Statutory Issue: Whether the contract between Great Atlantic Railroad Company and the Italian workers is binding upon them or considered as a violation of Act of 1885.
If I were to give legal advice to the Great Atlantic R.R. Co., I will recommend that the subsequent terms and conditions that are included in individual contracts entered between the Italian workers and the company should be declared void and have no effect. Although Section 1 of Act 1885 stated that the law cannot be made applicable to transactions entered prior to the passage of the act, it can be gleaned ...

Introduction

Nathaniel Hawthorne ranks among the world’s major authors. His proficiency in the art of literature, particularly short fiction is unmatched. Two of his most famous works are Young Goodman Brown and The Minister’s Black Veil. In these two short fictional stories, Hawthorne portrays a romantic view of sin and people. Like many other romantic literature pieces, the setting of the stories is dark and gloomy. Religion plays a huge role in both stories. History reveals that the American nation was partly founded through the ideals of religion. From its inception, religion has helped to shape and define the modern ...

The subject of King David has long fascinated artists, particularly with regard to his defeat of the Philistine giant Goliath. There have been many different sculptures and paintings representing this Old Testament figure, done in different artistic styles an with different areas of emphasis.
#1. This sculptor features David as he is about to fling the stone from his slingshot toward Goliath. The ability of the sculptor to provide balance is advanced, as the figure is twisting while standing on two feet. The musculature is realistically represented, as the young shepherd’s legs are visibly flexing and his ...

Since time immemorial, the conduct of two or more parties in business transactions has been one of a warring nature. This led to the inception of contract law so as try to iron out any friction that might arise during the usual business transactions. Contract law was created with an aim of governing all the essential practices during the enforcement of a contract. Categorically, contract law has continuously grown to encompass emergent issues that include the obligation of an employer to the actions of an employee and that of a minor in the entering into a contract. Additionally, other implied aspects of good ...

Question 1

The Conclusion made in the second argument is that there was a reason behind the start of the existence of causal reality. I do believe that the conclusion made is true. This is because causal reality is a reality that is observed or experienced as a result of a certain occurrence. In my opinion, all causes or occurrences exhibit some result, which ultimately, lead to the existence of a certain reality.

Question 2

The conclusion made in argument two has been properly supported by the premises given in the same argument. This is because the first premise in the second argument suggests that for anything to ...

The guidelines and chargeback fees clauses required by large retailers are negotiable. The chargeback fees currently being imposed on suppliers are exceedingly high and in most cases, they are not founded justly. Though contracts are legally binding, discontent backed by facts on unfairness from one of the parties makes the fees clauses negotiable (Jennings, 2008). The stakeholders involved in clothing supply can negotiate and seek common ground concerning the penalty clauses and the other guidelines.

Applicability of the doctrine of unconscionability

The doctrine of unconscionability is applied during the defense against the enforcement of a contract when the terms imposed on one party are excessively unfair. ...

QUESTIONS

1. Stewart repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, despite the conviction and failed appeal, yet she still says she did nothing wrong. Is this the right strategy?

Stewarts’ strategy may seem a bit unorthodox but, considering many factors that were brought to the table, it can be argued that it was the best at the time. For a long time, Martha Stewart had enjoyed a big share of praise from media, home owners and business partners. She was considered the epitome of successful women. Having built her multimillion dollar empire, there was needed to protect the reputation of the same. Her insistence on not ...

The appeals court should rule in favor of the defendant, Jewett. This ruling is arrived at by the use of the primary assumption of risk doctrine. The particulars of the case point at an implied assumption of risk by the plaintiff. By getting into a session of an active sport, the plaintiff could not claim any duty of care owed to her by the defendant during the active sport event.

Knight bases her claim on the legal doctrine of negligence. She claims that the defendant owed her a reasonable duty of care during the game of touch football. She claims that ...

Introduction

Fisher V. Dees was a case in appellate court pitting Marvin Fisher as the appellant and Rick Dees as the appellee. The determination of this case had serious implications on the fair use of intellectual property as defined by the copyright law in America. This paper ventilates on the on the facts involved in the case, the consideration and holding of the appellate court and the implications of the holding in the music and entertainment industry.

Facts of the Case

The following are the facts that were considered in the determination of the case. The appellee in the case sought permission from the owner ...

High trees case or Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947] KB 130 is an English contract law verdict, which restated the doctrine of promissory estoppel in contract law in both England and Wales1. Promissory estoppel was a notion which was identified in a couple of 19th century cases but then it lay inactive until this High Trees case in which Denning J, then a young judge, revitalized the doctrine and subsequently entrenched it a number of English cases.
The case symbolizes the establishment of the modern revitalization of promissory estoppel. The facts were straightforward enough. A landlord ...

Islamophobic Media in Case of Park51

The past decade has experienced an increased growth of disdain for Muslims in the west especially in America. It has been a period where the western people have not hesitated to voice their opinions and expressions about Islam. The growing disdain, especially in America has been due to the 9/11 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center in New York. However, the proposal for the construction of an Islamic center close to the site of 9/11 terrorist attack provoked anti-Muslims activists who created a notion that the proposal was a scheme by Muslims in America to conquer the hallowed site of 9/11 ...

Introduction - Director’s duties

Even though the law recognizes corporations as separate and distinct entities from the owners, it nevertheless recognizes that corporations act through people. Such people are referred to as directors and manage the activities of a corporation. In Lennard’s Carrying Co. v. Asiatic Petroleum Co. Ltd, the court observed that directors are the directing mind and will of the company. Accordingly, directors of a company act for and behalf of the company, and as such owe several duties to the company.
These duties are at common law and also statutorily provided for. In the U.S., there is no single statute ...

Miranda V. Arizona and Terry V. Ohio
The case of Miranda versus Arizona is a landmark case in the US Supreme Court decision that upholds the constitutional rights of an accused in a criminal case the guarantee of protection against self incrimination under the Fifth Amendment and the right to a counsel during the custodial investigation under the Sixth Amendment. It is where the Miranda Rights originated which is a procedure in every custodial investigation of reading the different rights of an accused before being interrogated by the authorities. The case reinforces the essential requirement of these procedural due process of providing ...

Introduction

Erie Railroad v Tompkins was a fairly simple case in which the Supreme Court was called upon to give an interpretation as to the application of state common law over federal common law in cases of diversity jurisdiction. In addition, the case is celebrated for its empowerment of the state common law as it clearly denied Congress the power to set federal common law, an action it perceived as unconstitutional.

Federal Court’s obligation to state court decisions prior to Erie Railroad v Tompkins

Before the decision in Erie, federal courts enjoyed the discretion as to whether to follow decisions from the state courts or not. Despite issues falling under diversity jurisdiction necessitating the ...

Question one – Case study

This case was heard by the Supreme Court at Brisbane in the state of Queensland. The judgment was delivered at Brisbane by Judge Fryberg on the 24th January, 2011.
The judge in the case was Fryberg J. The case was heard on the 2nd and 3rd December, 2010.
The Plaintiff in the case is Ms Mee Wah To, a landlord who owns a parcel of land located at 33 Lisson Grove, Wooloowin. The Defendant on the other hand is Miss Eugene Choi, a tenant of part of the land owned by Miss Mee Wah To.
The counsel for the ...

Introduction

Erie Railroad v Tompkins was a fairly simple case in which the Supreme Court was called upon to give an interpretation as to the application of state common law over federal common law in cases of diversity jurisdiction. In addition, the case is celebrated for its empowerment of the state common law as it clearly denied Congress the power to set federal common law, an action it perceived as unconstitutional.

Federal Court’s obligation to state court decisions prior to Erie Railroad v Tompkins

Before the decision in Erie, federal courts enjoyed the discretion as to whether to follow decisions from the state courts or not. Despite issues falling under diversity jurisdiction necessitating the ...

Business Law 201

Question one:

Question two:
Joint and several contract because several people (study team) has agreed to pay the fees to the tutor.
Question three:
Doctor Kut Wright can only recover up to a maximum of $800 for the benefit extended to Henry. Though the contract was unenforceable since it was not entered into, Wright is entitled to compensation for the costs incurred for missing his flight amounting to $400 and the reasonable amount of $400 for the one hour. It is clear that the requirements of recovery for quasi-contracts were met since the doctor was in reasonable ...

MEMORANDUM

RE : PHARMACEUTICAL LAW AND LIABILITY
Dr. Frankenstein may be held liable for products liability in the event that he fails to comply with regulations of the US FDA regulations. There are three theories under the product liability including the Negligence Theory, Strict Liability Theory, and Breach of Warranty Theory.
It can be argued that the Wonkavision device is no longer patentable since it is considered part of a prior art for it has been in the market for almost 40 years. However, the fact that it can provide treatment of patients infected with Ebola will qualify it ...

In this case study, an employee who had worked as an engineer for a church in Utah had his employment terminated after the church claimed that he had failed to qualify for a temple recommend. A temple recommend is essentially a certificate that verifies that one is a member of a certain church and that he is, therefore, eligible to attend the church’s temples. This document is usually given to individuals who are observant of the Church’s standards in matters that include tithing, church attendance, and abstinence from alcohol and so on. The employee sued the church claiming that his dismissal comprised ...

Chapter 10: What is the ethics behind our ideologies?

The case study on Chapter 10 questions an individual responsibility on the pretext of business to what it might bring in terms of political and military interest overseas. Mr. Dan was acting carefully in exporting non military products to Turkey. He has just been appointed as the new export manager and he was wary about Aishagu Import-Export Trading Company, a Turkish company. It surprised him that the owner of this Turkish company happened to be a college classmate and dorm mate, Mr. Mustafa. He suddenly remembered the political intent of this guy and wondered if the exports are being used to ...

There are several legal issues arising from the third scenario. First is whether the employer, the Lazy River, Inc. is liable for Lucy’s failure to adhere to reasonable commands directed to her by her boss Mike. The second issue is whether the sixteen (16) year old worker was an independent contractor, if so, whether it is the employer or the hiring party that is liable for injuries to the independent contractor. The third issue is that of negligence. That is, whether the company was negligent for failure to foresee that the toxic chemicals present in water could cause ...

Overview

I have been appointed in the position of the city manager of Gill Ville, a city with a population of about 200000 people. There are several issues to be addressed within the city departments. The citizens are aware of unethical behaviors in the management of the city, and they have lost their trust and support for the Mayor and the local government. My job is to get the city back on its track and satisfy the expectation of the citizens.
There are several issues to be addressed within the departments to improve on service delivery to the citizens. The main ...

Overview

I have been appointed in the position of the city manager of Gill Ville, a city with a population of about 200000 people. There are several issues to be addressed within the city departments. The citizens are aware of unethical behaviors in the management of the city and they have lost their trust and support for the Mayor and the local government. My job is to get the city back on its tack and satisfy the expectation of the citizens.
There are several issues to be addressed within the departments to improve on service delivery to the citizens. The main ...

The Exclusionary Rule is one of the more important rules that is utilized in the American judicial system. The entire American judicial system is designed to protect the individual's rights from the government, and to limit the amount of power that the federal and state governments have over the citizenry. In criminal trials, the individual is considered innocent by the government until proven guilty; this is to protect the individual citizen against unfair or untrue allegations, and to ensure that all citizens receive a fair trial when they are accused of criminal activity.
The exclusionary rule or the exclusionary ...

This paper will examine the case study ‘The Ethical Chocolate Company’ whose Managing Director is Mr. Graham. The paper will seek to reveal the essential areas that Mr. Graham should focus on. It will also recommend measures that he can implement to ameliorate the company. The paper will comprehensively analyze the ideal leadership style for the company, the motivation and job designs that the management should adopt, and how to deal with stress at the work place.
First, it is vital to underscore the significance of competent and capable leadership at workplace. From the case study, it is ...

There are two main characters in this case study, the First is Harvey Finley, who is the manager and owner of Troupville Business Systems and second is the receptionist Cathy Brennen. Seven years ago Mr. Finley decided to explore the opportunities in business and decided to open up his own firm. Though the conditions of the market were not favorable in Troupville due to recent cases of layoffs, bankruptcies, and plummeting real estate values, he decided to take this as an opportunity and build something to capitalize upon his experience and success as a salesman. He was determined that Troupville ...

The fight against crime can be dealt with and has been dealt with in many ways. One of the most prompted ways of fighting crime is the reduction and fight against drug abuse and substance abuse. The psychologists state that, when a person is under the influence of drugs chances of engaging in crime are usually high (Peet, 2004). As a political science student I carried out an interview with a catholic catechist who takes part in the interfaith drug policy initiative on the take of the organization on crime. The following are excerpts from the interview.

The purpose of the organization ...

Arguably, bottled water is one of the swift growing drinking choices in the world; in fact, people in the globe spend billions in buying it. As a matter of fact, bottled water has been a debatably issues, especially, on its contents, morality, healthy, and ethical aspects of it. The content of bottled water differs, depending of the type of company it produces, nutritional information, and ingredients that it contains. Hence, some of the contents of the bottled water include inorganic minerals and metals, such as calcium, fluoride, potassium, magnesium, and biocarbonate. Moreover, water contains some ingredients that are useful to the ...

Application of the Natural Law Theory in the Management of a Case in Relation with the Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care

Introduction

Natural laws are principles with reasons used to examine the human nature and are set by the natural world. These natural laws in most cases use justification to examine the nature of humans and try to explain morality and ethics basing on the religious perspective. Additionally, natural laws often are joined with common laws and norms of the societies but in most cases these natural laws contend that specific rights and values are acquired genetically from parents. In addition, these natural laws are related to ethical and religious directives for catholic health care which actually stipulate the bioethics ...

Management and Leadership Development

Introduction
Competitions among organizations are tight these days. The success or failure of the company’s market edge in the industry largely depends on the effectiveness of their respective management teams. Management effectiveness includes, but is not limited to, creativeness and the ability to think outside of the box. Resourcefulness and strategic skills are essential in determining ways to outsmart the competitors in today’s global industry. In this paper, readers would get to learn about the techniques and strategies to manage global organizations effectively. Readers will learn the competitors’ edge over one company in relation to management ...

Purposes of law

In broad terms, the major function of the law is act as a platform or system of order that levies punishment for crimes that have been defined by the same law. Another function of law is to ensure that there is a uniform fairness across all boards of the justice system. In the business environment, the law also provides a platform whereby disputes between different parties are resolved, and the legal rights of the different parties in the business are also discussed. It is of the essence to note that the law is also used in businesses as a catalyst that is used ...

Introduction

Disputes in the construction industry or in the process of honoring roles in a construction contract are not uncommon in many countries, a good of example which would be the United Arab Emirates (UAE) wherein the construction industry has been in a stage of boom for the past several years . Some of the world’s Mega structures and other fascinating architectural works are located in this Middle Eastern country. It is one of the largest exporters of oil and petroleum products and this country’s largest city, Dubai, is home to a range of spectacular and grand architectural works. It is home to ...

U.S. v. Waldon

The decision in this case is an affirmation of the United States Court of Appeals of the decision rendered by an inferior court concerning the death sentence of the appellant. The defendant sought the reversal of the death penalty passed on him by relying on some irregularities committed by the grand jury. The appellant claimed the trial judge acted contrary to the language used in the Federal Death Penalty Act (FDPA).

Facts of the Case

Waldon was the deputy sheriff at Jacksonville’s Sheriff Office (JSO). Between 1994 and1997 he served on the SWAT team. In April 1197, Waldon was ...

Mayfair Ltd. would be obligated to pay Speedymove the increased price of £8,000 because the modification made to the contract was valid.
A binding contract is created through the process of mutual assent (offer and acceptance) and consideration, definiteness, and when no valid defenses or excuses to contract exist. In this case, both parties appear to agree that a valid contract was formed and existed to deliver 150 frames for an exhibition at the price of 6,000, 25 frames at a time over a period of six weeks, although the fact pattern does not specify whether the contract is ...

(Professor/Instructor)
In 2001, American military forces in Afghanistan arrested American Yaser Hamdi. US military officials charged Hamdi with collaborating with the Taliban and subsequently termed as an “enemy combatant,” and detained to a military detention facility in Virginia. Virginia-based lawyer Frank Dunham filed a motion for habeas corpus for Hamdi in Federal court, initially for his own and then on behalf of Hamdi’s father.
In Dunham’s motion to declare Hamdi’s detention unconstitutional, Dunham argued that Hamdi’s “right to due process” as enshrined in the Fifth Amendment by detaining him sine die and not allowing Hamdi ...

1) On the 12th of September 2 trains collided. The engineer of the train 111 was Robert M. Sanchez who from the early age was interested in this sphere. He did his best to fulfill his dream, he got hired to Metrolink, but on the 12th of September in 2008 he had his last commute route. There are some causes of the Metrolink accident.Sanchez was inattentive (before he had received several discipline letters for not following the rules). He wasn’t supposed to use his cell phone at work but he did (Sanchez texted to one teenager who was a ...

Business Contracts

Business Contracts
The Contract Should Be A Legally Binding Covenant Involving More Than One Person As A Witness During The Agreement. There Is A Need To Consider Some Necessary Factors Towards Both Sides Before Signing A Contract. Generally, The Fist Factor To Be Provided Towards The Deal Is Certainly The Readiness. The Readiness Is Basically, An Important Factor For Both Sides Involved In The Deal. These Factors Must Assure The Legal Binding Of The Covenant On Both Sides. Additionally, The Second Factor To Be Considered Is Called The Agreement Of An Offer. The Basic Role Of This Factor ...

Miranda v Arizona

The brief facts of the case were that the defendant Ernesto Miranda was arrested on the 13th of March 1963 by the police based on circumstantial evidence that linked him to the rape of an 18year old girl. Following an interrogation by police that lasted two hours, Miranda signed a confession statement to the rape charge on forms that alleged that he had made the confession without any coercion and out of his own free will. The form also stated that the defendant was well aware of his legal rights as well as the fact that any statements or confessions ...

Henry IV Secures the Monarchy

A monarchy refers to the hereditary mode of governance with all the powers vested in the monarch who is the head of state (Wise Geek 1). The French absolutism began during Henry IV’s rule. When he came into office, the country was in a state of chaos resulting from endless religious wars between the two divisions of the Christian faith in addition to political in-fighting. The popularity of the state had significantly gone down with poor control of government money due to disorder in the country.
Henry IV witfully asserted a lot of effort to turn the situation around. ...

Question 1

Facts relevant to the case
The petitioner Hosanna Tabor evangelical Lutheran church and school, runs a small school offering Christian education. It has two categories of teachers in its ranks namely “called” teachers and “lay” teachers. Called teachers are considered called to the vocation by God.
The respondent Cheryl Perich is a called teacher. She teaches secular subjects but takes the students in a religious class in addition to leading them in prayers; devotional exercises attended a weekly chapel service and led the service twice a year. Perich fell ill with narcolepsy in June 2004 and, as a result began the 2004–2005 ...

Programme / Qualification name: BSc (Hons) Business Administration

All NCC Education assessed assignments submitted by students must have this statement as the cover page or it will not be accepted for marking. Please ensure that this statement is either firmly attached to the cover of the assignment or electronically inserted into the front of the assignment.
I have read and understood NCC Education’s Policy on Academic Dishonesty and Plagiarism.
I can confirm the following details:

Centre Name:

Module Leader:
I confirm that this is my own work and that I have not plagiarised any part of it. I have also noted the assessment criteria and ...

Dear Madam,

Re: Management Consultancy Report in Respect of Your Firm Amanda Smith
The consultancy has carried out an analysis and comprehensive evaluation of your firm and arrived at a number of observations that need to be brought to your attention in the immediacy of time. In addition, this report contains a number of recommendations that the firm ought to pursue in the interest of its own survival and strategy in pursuit of business. In our analysis and recommendations, we were guided by managerial theory, scientific and strategic models and as well as experience gathered and observed throughout in the industry over ...

1. What is the strongest objection to Anselm's Proslogion 2 argument?
The greatest objection to Anselm's Proslogion is the fact that Anselm contradicts his views. It is not clear what Anselm's perception of God is. According to him, God is a supreme being that exhibits traits of perfection. At the same time, Anselm describes God as being a simple being that goes about the activities of the universe calmly and in a silent manner. The next set of traits that Anselm describes brings out God as being an associated with eternity. Eternity in this context refers to life everlasting. This is a ...

Madeline Neumann

The parents are guilty of causing the death of Madeline Neumann. The death was caused by recklessness on the side of the parents. The 11-year-old child was suffering from diabetes and the parents could not seek medical assistance. The girl had experienced several days or weeks of deteriorating health condition caused by diabetic ketoacidosis, which is readily treatable. The parents believed that the worsening condition was spiritual warfare between Jesus and evil forces. This made them believe that resisting worldly medicine would save her. The child died of neglect and child abuse by her parents. Every child is granted ...

Clearly state the statistic of interest and the popular source.

The statistic of interest is a report in the CNN News article “more Educated Tend to Be More Religious by Some Measures” reported on August 11 2011. It states that individuals become more religious with an increase in education levels.

Clearly state the academic journal from which the media-reported statistic originated and the author or authors who conducted the study.

Schwadel, Philip. "The Effects of Education on Americans’ Religious Practices, Beliefs, and Affiliations." Review of Religious Research 53 (n.d.): 161-182. Print.
Explain in detail, how the statistic reported in the popular media was “measured.” How did the author(s) determine “involvement with religious institutions? Did the author(s) clearly describe how data for the reported statistic was gathered? ...

The establishment of a legal entity that is detached from the individual entities of the individuals for the purposes of conducting business as a group is known as incorporation.1 It is a simple and voluntary act which is ideal for small enterprises that is an alternative to forming a company that is limited by guarantee or a co-operative. With the incorporation of a company come certain advantages and responsibilities as defined by the Australian Law. The individuals who chose to form an incorporated association are not entitled to use the profits accrued in the process of conducting the business for personal gain.
There are ...

Question 1

According to the corporations act 2001 (cth), section 249H subsection 1 a valid notice of a meeting of a meeting of shareholders should be at least 21 days. The only exception to this rule is when all the members of the company agree beforehand for a shorter notice or when members of the company who have 95% of the voting power or more agree beforehand on the issue of a notice shorter than 21 days. The company issued a notice of seven days, which is less than the legal requirement by 14 days. The annual general meeting of the Sparx Ltd was therefore not valid ...

Abstract

This paper is an examination of some of the psychological aspects of the child/parent relationship. Hansel and Gretel has been analyzed by many, who put forth the notion that it offers a model for understanding the psychological roots of child abandonment, abuse and neglect. As such, this essay offers an overview of a preventive approach that may be applicable to the plight of families, particularly impoverished families such as Hansel and Gretel’s.

A Cautionary Fable: Understanding Primal Fear and Violence in ‘Hansel and Gretel’

Hansel and Gretel is an expression of childhood anxiety over abandonment and parental rejection. It touches ...

The Case is being contended under four criterions; the first criteria being, whether there could be a triable issue of existence as to whether the employee was under employment during the occurrence of the accident that caused the injuries. In this respect, when a judgmental summary is appropriately adhered to, the court has an obligation to establish as to whether there is an issue to be tried. If it is determined that no triable issue of fact is in existence, it is the duty of the court to opt for contending the case using the law.

The second criterion is as ...