Verdict College Essays Samples For Students

Jury Trial Analysis

A jury trial is a legal proceeding whereby a case is presented to a jury to make decisions and findings of fact and reach a verdict which is later applied by a judge. A jury is a group of people sworn in to hear, judge, and give a verdict on a given case. Jury trials are regularly used in serious criminal cases. The work of a jury is to scrutinize the evidence provided in the courtroom and agree on whether beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the crime in question. Jury trials are mainly used in serious criminal cases. Their work is to find the facts on ...

The judicial process is a long and complex one, often spanning months of complex deliberation. Each step is carefully created to ensure the most thorough, fair and complete examination of a civil or criminal case, and to cover all possible issues and concerns. In this paper, we will go through the complete judicial process step by step to gain a better understanding of how a civil or criminal case goes to court.

Jury Selection

After an arrest is made and an arraignment leads to trial, the jury must then be selected. The selection of a jury is a careful and thorough process, ensuring that a trial gets twelve ...

Direct verdict could be defined as a verdict which has been ordered by a trial judge in the event that the plaintiff fails to present a prima facie case or whereby the defendant is unable to present a necessary defence.The judge will enter a directed verdict if he/she concludes that the plaintiff is weak to merit a verdict in plaintiffs favor. (Currier&Eimermann, 2009, p.g135)
It can also be said that, direct verdict is whereby a court grants the verdict in the event that the party which is having the burden of proof has failed to furnish the courtroom with enough testimonies of a genuine fact that ...

The play, 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, is an attention-grabbing play that exhibits the American judicial system in an organized way. The play is about a teenager who is being trialed for committing the murder of his own father, and the jury, consisting of 12 men, is seated in a room to discuss and decide his fate. Moreover, the jury comes to a standstill when juror number 8 declines to choose ‘guilty’ for the convict unlike the others. However justice served in the end when he is able to convince the other jurors and is able to prove that the boy ...

Introduction

Human behavior can sometimes be understood from varied perspectives. 12 Angry Men and The Invisible War are films that provide a broad converse over which a number of social issues can be understood. Social life in every society comes with its own challenges with respect to the manner in which norms and regulations are established. Both of the movies have a basis from different set ups; hence, their understanding can only be understood from the context where they are set up. Although the films are drawn from different set ups, aspects of human behavior analysis can still be ensured.
The film, ...

Steps in Criminal Jury Trial

Upon being charged with a crime, the defendant is provided with some documents including an appearance notice and promise to appear in court, summons, the information, etc. This states the charges, the offense, and then date, time and place of the opening court appearance (Walston-Dunham, 2011). In this instance, the case now proceeds to the trial phase. For a case to be complete, it has to follow through six main steps i.e. selecting a jury, opening statements, evidence presentation and cross-examination, the final remarks, jury instructions, and finally the jury verdict.
Selecting the jury - The first step begins ...

12 Angry Men is a film about a jury consisted of twelve men all of whom have their own system of beliefs which is hard to change. They are members of the community and are supposed to reach a verdict because they are jurymen. The legal system has flaws which is why the jurors need to decide about the guilt of the defendant. The defendant is an eighteen-year-old boy who allegedly stabbed and killed his father although there is reasonable doubt that he did not commit this crime. The juror Number Three is the man who looks for answers ...

A recent verdict by the grand jury of United States coming on the night of November 24, 2014 stating not to indict the police officer named Darren Wilson was weird enough to trigger a protest which has calmed over a period of time. The case dates back to 9 August, 2014 when a police officer named Darren Wilson fired at least six bullets at an 18 year old teenager named Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri including two to his head. Shockingly the teenager was unarmed and the fact that he was an African American drags the case in the zone of racism. ...

Introduction

Social injustices such as prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, and aggression manifest themselves in almost all communities in the world. The injustices are often very complicated in places inhabited by multiethnic and multiracial communities. Although, racial prejudice and discrimination has been largely minimized, there still exist some social injustices based on other factors such as gender, age, ethnicity, nationality among other divisive lines. Many times these incidents can be explained using social psychology theories. Regina Rose’s 1957 film Twelve Angry Men perfectly captures issues about prejudice, discrimination, stereotyping, and aggression through the eyes of a jury, in a homicide trial. The theme ...

Introduction

Marder (2005) reports that jury trials are commonly used in the criminal trials in the common law legal system. The United States is famous for its consistence use of juries over bench judges in criminal legal tussles. The use of juries has extended to include civil cases in the United States and Canada. The jury process in the United States tends to be high profile discussions. However, legal scholars admit that the public exaggerate how often juries are used. Marder (2005) adds that, in the United States, there about 150, 000 thousand cases every year in the state Courts. ...

A jury is a group of randomly selected adults from the community to participate in the criminal justice process as jurors. The first step is to elect members to serve as jurors for a specified time. In the selection of the jurors, the jury commissioners use a list of designated people either by voter register or any other accepted criteria and ensures that the selected people reflect the diversity inherent in the community. All people over eighteen years have an equal chance to join the Jury services (“The answer book for jury service,” n.d.). For a felony, the jury ...

If we rely on the principles of equity and equality during the proceedings, we will without any doubt conclude that such features of any person as race, skin, nationality, age cannot be the basis for one’s assessment of his personality, especially when the judgment mainly depends on this verdict. Notwithstanding, different researches have proven the opposite state of affairs. For example, Chiricos and Crawford (Wang, 2008) after analyzing 38 different cases “claimed that blacks are more likely to be sentenced to prison than whites”; Spohn (p. 15) concluded that “racial minorities were sentenced more harshly than whites, if ...

Business

Introduction
As per international business theory there exist several functional frameworks for the analyzing the external atmosphere of particular nations. These models could be employed by the corporations, which intend to internationalise and define the appropriate location(s) overseas (Mellahi et. al., 2002). Correspondingly, these frameworks also offer good information for enlightening the location choices that companies have made already. One of these frameworks is the Porter’s Diamond Model formulated by Michael Porter during the year 1990. Moreover, this particular paper attempts to explore its benefits and drawbacks as a technique for the assessment of company’s home ...

Introduction

A large amount of literature has examined the ability of jurors to make proper decisions regarding punitive damages in contract law. Opponents of punitive damages assert that juries are not able to understand the complexities of legal issues and, therefore, use extensive punitive damages against individuals or corporations based on emotions rather than as reasonable response to the damages occurred. They argue that judges have the legal competence and experience to make more informed decisions. Punitive damages have been traditionally awarded to plaintiffs in tort actions and it has been assumed for long that punitive damages cannot be implemented ...

This genre-analysis paper looks at three letters to different newspaper editors. In order to be in opposition to come up with concrete claims about the characteristics of letters to the editor, I decided to pick letters from three major newspapers; the New York Times, the Boston Globe and the Los Angele Times. The letter from the New York Times is entitled “The Ethical Debate of Assisted Suicide” and is written by Jeffrey Freeman. This letter is intended to reach the social domain of the American society especially those audiences who have concerns over the involvement of physicians in helping ...

Introduction

Maeder, et al. (2016) defined “CSI effect” as the unreasonable expectations of jurors on the sophistication of forensic science as a consequence of learning about it through television programs, such as the CSI (Crime Scene Investigation), resulting in fewer convictions in the absence of sophisticated forensic evidence against the accused. Lobo and Schnobrich-Davis (2015) referred to this as the “Tech effect”, which essentially extends the definition into the advances in information dissemination technology and beyond ‘crime scene television shows’.

Article Summary

Research questions: The Lobo and Schnobrich-Davis (2015) study was guided by three research questions: (1) Does the CSI effect (as ...

IDEOLOGIES: OLD AND WORN OUT OR FRESH AND NECESSARY

FOR THE POLITICS OF TODAY

Harvard 8 pages 20 references
1.0 Ideologies: Old and worn out or fresh and necessary in politics today
1.1 Introduction
All ideologies “embody an account of social and political reality and an account of how that reality could be bettered” (Finlay et al.2003:2). In other words ideologies are based in political and social reality but at the same time they are linked to a dream of a better world. Historically the Conservative and Liberal Party have been the two most powerful and popular types of ideologies in the United Kingdom (UK). The names of ...

Abstract

The paper is aimed at analyzing the criminal justice system. In this regard, the paper has examined the case of “11-CV-22122 Lawrence V. MS & RE Kesef Corporation” with respect to the concepts of prejudice along with the moral laws. The paper yields the outcomes that the court has made a viable decision entailing the criminal and moral laws that take in the biblical perspectives as well.

Introduction

The paper intends to analyze the essential components of a criminal justice system. For this purpose, the paper examines the “11-CV-22122 Lawrence V. MS & RE Kesef Corporation” case. It was trialed in the “ ...

I. Introduction
Under the Sixth Amendment, one of the fundamental rights that a person accused of a crime holds is the right to a “public trial by an impartial jury of the state and district” where the crime was committed. Subsequent Supreme Court jurisprudence has interpreted the Sixth Amendment’s impartial jury provision to mean a jury composed of unbiased individuals in regards to how the perceive the defendant. While an important of consideration as to whether a juror is biased has focused on issues of race, ethnicity, gender, and national origin. An equally important consideration is whether a ...

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jul/08/kashmir.india
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2010/sep/30/ayodhya-verdict-hindus-muslims-india

Abstract

The paper offers the example of conflicts between Muslim and Hindus in India and what are the main conflicts in those issues. It looks into how the country and its people get affected because of those conflicts between Muslim and Hindus. The relation of mistrust between the two communities has left a deep mark on the political situation in India, and the problems are far from over as those fears and mistrust have only grown with time. The paper summarize articles on those conflicts and also looks at the possible solutions.

Introduction

Muslim-Hindu tension: Land riots bring down ...

Introduction

Same sex marriage and its acceptance in the society has been a topic of discussion for long. While the opponents of same-sex marriage argue that it is against nature, the supporters of the institution argue that the very basis of individual freedom of choice is denied by not recognizing this marriage. There are many states in USA including Massachusetts, Connecticut, New York, Washington, New Jersey and Hawaii that recognize and license same-sex marriages and treat them as equal as heterosexual marriages. On the other hand, there are states including Utah, Michigan, Virginia, Texas and Oklahoma that do not recognize same-sex ...

‘Name’

‘Instructor’s Name’
The verdict on Trayvon Martin case was out coincidentally on the year which marks the 50th anniversary of the civil rights March led by Martin Luther King Jr. Given the range of emotions the verdict attracted, the president decided to give an unscheduled speech, six days after the Florida court acquitted George Zimmerman. Obama’s speech clearly reflects that, though racism in the American society has improved a lot in the past few decades, still there is much to be done in that area. While the opinion on the verdict given by the Florida court is ...

Introduction

Kelly (n.d.) wrote that this U.S. Supreme Court case in 1896 followed on from earlier cases in the Louisiana courts in 1892, which were the consequences of Homer Plessy (a light-skinned African American) seating himself in a Louisiana train railroad car designated as “whites only”, then refusing to leave, for which he was arrested. That landmark Supreme Court case verdict had a huge impact on African Americans, as described in the following paragraphs.

The Case and its Impacts

The Majlessi Law Firm’s article (n.d.) entitled “Historic Trial – Plessy V. Ferguson” states that Plessy’s attempt to travel on an East Louisiana train in a “whites-only” car – for ...

A criminal defense attorney is a professional who mainly defends people and other entities accused of criminal conduct. A criminal defense attorney operates either as an individual or as a group of individuals. When operating as a group, the attorneys form a firm under whose name they operate. Additional defense attorneys can be employed by the legal firm and serve to present their clients in court. Most of them are in private practice although majority may start out working for the government. Their work consists of providing legal assistance and representation to people accused of breaking the law.
On the other hand, a ...

Revenge is one of the most powerful feelings that people can experience in their lives. It is not surprising that writers, film makers and other representatives of the art actively use it in their work. In the past we can find such works as Shakespeare's Othello and Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter, and the recent film V for Vendetta continues developing on this theme. By analyzing these stories, we can see how depiction of revenge and, consequently, its perception by people has changed over time. In each of these plots there is a character that is so absorbed by this ...

Introduction

Criminal justice system is a classification of laws and institutions directed to safeguard citizens and their property by perpetuating social control, preventing and alleviating crime. It verifies whether an action is an offence or not to the community. In Australia, everyone is presumed to be innocent until proven guilty by the law. As such, the law sanctions lawbreakers with criminal penalties and rehabilitation efforts. The fundamental advantage criminal system of justice is that the accused cannot prove their state of innocence and it is the sole purpose of the state, via the prosecutor to determine the guilt (Daly, Israel, & Goldsmith, ...

Introduction

Crime is a problem that persists in every society in spite of the advancements that the society has made socially and economically. The problem of crime is a reason for major concerns for both individuals and governments. For instance a survey carried out in 2008 in the United States of America showed that 50% of the respondents were at one time or another worried that burglars would attack their homes or their cars would be vandalized by criminals. They were also worried that the crime rates in the nation had gone up considerably over the past one year.

The concerns are justified ...

What principles with respect to women battering and self-defense have been established in Lavallee's case?

Most of the case law involving female offenders depends on the Supreme Court of Canada's verdict in Lavallee, which accepted proof that an offender had encountered violence elicited by the victim, Battered Woman Syndrome (BWS)1, as applicable to the problem of self-defense. In the Lavallee case2, proof was disclosed demonstrating that the offender had been exposed to years of abuse owing to the victim, and she was acquitted of murder because she had acted in self-defense.
Battered women constitute one of the most marginalized groupings in the social order. Their relationship incidents occasionally put these individuals into ...

Review 1: Virtual Machines

Introduction
Conclusion
Is the document motivated by a use case?
The document explains the company’s need in the introduction. The company seeks to create a software but it lacks the proper machines for its development. Hence, the author comes up with suggestions towards solving the problem.

Does Author Clearly Explain Proposed Solution to Problem

Does the Author Clearly Explain How The Proposed Solution Solves The Problem?
Is the Paper Formal or Informal?
The paper follows the formal structure as per the proper tone used in the document. The author directs most of his points towards a learned person or official.

Spelling and Grammar

Can the document be used by ...

Rodney G. King was an African-American taxi driver who came into limelight after being beaten up by four LAPD officers on the night of 2nd March 1991. The incident sparked nation-wide unrest and communal riots leading to fifty four deaths, seven thousand arrests, several injuries and losses worth millions of dollars. “The events brought to the forefront concerns about racism and police brutality within the L.A.P.D.”
The incident took place at the night of March 2, 1991 when King was speeding his Hyundai car and was chased down by two patrol officers. He tried to dodge the cops for ...

Little things in life – these are not a coffee in the morning, not silk skirts, not funny posts on live journal and new pictures on the mirror, not a fast, unlimited Internet, not a fashionable cafe, not new books or old silent films. It's not that, no. Little things in life are small, simple, unicellular, kind actions marked nearly touch. One man committed, did, asked, said something important for another, when it is not needed and is not asked to do. That are - those fractional pebbles and pearls that make up the picture, mosaic, fresco of our life.
...

Shortcomings of the Jury System as a Democratic Instrument

Introduction
The jury system was incepted in the 16th century and introduced in England but practiced first by the pilgrims who settled in Massachusetts conducted the first jury trial in 1630. The jury system was seen as a fortification against the abuse of government power. The jurors helped the judiciary members in practicing democracy in the offices and law practice. Today, the jury panel is significant in the American history, this system works well but can be improved based on tackling the issues being faced. Jury decisions are usually based on the evidence presented, and they should be advised ...

Laws are established in a country so as to maintain order in the community. Laws are mainly written by leaders and failure to follow the laws leads to punishment by law enforcers or the judicial department. One may wonder whether or not citizens should follow the law without any objections. The obedience and lawbreaking issues appear to be a crucial issue in the real world as people struggle with enforcing and obeying laws stipulated in various institutions or nations. Some famous philosophers such as Socrates have played a significant role in the world of philosophy. Socrates defined and considered ...

CITATION: 276 N.C. 279 (1970)

FACTS

This article will strive to review the verdict given by the Court of Appeals regarding the case between Mason J. and Gaston County. The court declared non-suit after going through the defendant’s evidence and docketed the plaintiff’s request. The accused had finished high school in the year 1966. Later on in 1968, he got married at the age of nineteen and became emancipated. Mason needed money to complete his engineering course. His wife worked as a computer programmer, and they stayed in a rental. The two were expecting to have a baby; hence, Mason had ...

Introduction

CSI effect has brought a lot of frustration to the American legal system as jurors have developed unrealistic hopes as television shows has always made forensic science look simple, whereby in real life, it is a complex procedure. It has been found that the CSI effect has a huge impact on the legal system, especially in regards to the situation where jurors demand forensic evidence to use in criminal trials. This has led to criticism of forensic science television programs.
CSI effect is the way in which forensic science becomes exaggerated on the crime shows in television so as to influence ...

Jury nullification refers to instances where a jury reaches a determination contrary to the judges instruction on the law. Instead of basing their verdict on the law, jurors look at the facts and deems the law wrong. Consequently, the jury acquits the accused not because they did not violate the law but because the jury considers the flouted law flawed.Whether jury nullification is right or wrong depends on what one perceives to be their duty. While the Sixth Amendments guarantee one the inalienable right to a hearing by jury in criminal cases, the amendment is silent on the functions of jurors. Jurors ...

The Verdict

As a juror on this case, there is an abundance of information, testimony and evidence to take into account. I would like to begin this case analysis by first stating my verdict and then describing why. Based on the Prosecution’s testimony, I find the Defendant/suspect of the bank robbery of Small Town Bank guilty beyond reasonable doubt. My decision was formed based on the circumstances of the crime and pursuit, forensic findings, and what evidence was found useful when reaching the guilty verdict.

Circumstances of the Crime

I do believe that the suspect is the bank robber due to numerous and varying circumstances. ...

The fourth amendment to the US Constitution provides and ensures one of the fundamental human rights. This amendment guarantees freedom against unreasonable search and seizure by public servants and officials or any other agents of the US government. In order to conduct search and seizures legally, such officials and governmental agents are required to have reasonable ground, on the basis of which they receive specific warrant.
There are many cases concerning this constitutional amendment that were considered and decided by the US Supreme Court. And the landmark decision in this sphere is Tennessee v. Garner. According to the ...

Introduction

Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman were found death outside Brown’s Bundy Drive condo in Los Angeles in the Brentwood area. It is said that Nicole Brown Simpson and the O.J.Simpson divorced two years earlier. Police believed that O.J.Simpson was the murderer due to the evidence, which were both found and collected at the scene. Nicole was found to have defensive hand wounds. He also had several stabbings on his head. The larynx could be seen through a gaping in her neck and there was an incision of a vertebra C3.
Simpsons lawyers during trial the begged for permission ...

Graham v Conner490 U.S. 386 (1989)
Graham v Conner490 U.S. 386 (1989)
Facts of the case- Graham, the petitioner was a diabetic patient who requested his friend to drive him to a convenience store as he desperately needed orange juice in order to calm insulin reaction. He rushed to the store but due to a long queue, he asked friend to drive to one of his friend’s house and left store in haste. Seeing graham entering into store, buy nothing and leaving in haste, Conner, who was a police officer, stopped both of them in order to probe. Graham was ...

In the present day society, cases of racism being expressed openly have reduced, but there are chances that it is still perpetrated in subtle and non overt ways that are not clearly discernable. This is known as “modern racism.” Over the years, there have been fears that the justice system is not impervious to racism, and this has become a subject of interest for many scholars. A good example is Johnson et al (1995) who carried out a study to determine whether race affects decision making during criminal trials. Although the research was an eye-opener in several ways, a gap still exists ...

Introduction

Rhetoric in its wider sense, deals with persuasion and the various modes of persuasion which is kind of factual demonstration. Rhetoric is the identification of the means and ends of achieving effective persuasion, be it at now or in the future. Human condition makes its mind to perceive demonstrations as more convincing and persuasive. Therefore, speech helps with delivery of information by employing words, phrases and rhetoric questions.
The conceptual arguments used in speech, determine the general logical dialect in demonstration thereby helping to bring out persuasion. It is more important that any speaker should know that whether ...

The Brown vs. Board of Education case was a colossal influence on desegregation of schools in the United States of America. It created a milestone of equal opportunities in schools among the blacks and whites. The ruling of this case took place in 1954 and it ruled in favor of Mr. Brown. It is among one of the important cases ever heard on racial prejudice in the American history.
The Brown vs. Board of Education case is about a young third grader girl in Kansas, Topeka city named Linda Brown (Dudley 48). Linda was subjected to trekking one mile through a railway ...

The judge vs. a jury trial is a crucial decision to be made by the defendant after a consultation is made with his or her lawyers. According to Bergman and Bergman (2011), the defense lawyers have greater access than the accused to have background information about judges, their character and attitudes, and the technical issues surrounding the case. However, it is expected that the defendant is well abreast about the mood of the community toward the police and the type of crime that was committed by the defendant to which he is charged in order to assess the emotional appeal of the ...

Introduction

The research that was conducted was aimed at checking the effect of defendant facial expression on mock juror decision-making especially the power of remorse. Researchers had an interest in the facial expression of the defendant and this led them to experimentally manipulate the exhibit of remorse and anger in the defendant pictures so that they could assess the weight that could lead to decision making b y the mock jurors. The research discovered that, the defendants who were remorseful had more lenient verdicts when they were compared to those of an angry defendant. (Christian, 2001).

There was a major relationship between ...

Reporter Joe Drape writes about the conviction of Jerry Sandusky, a former Pennsylvania State University (PSU) assistant football coach, on 45 out of 48 counts of sexually assaulting 10 boys (¶ 1-3). Sandusky was the founder of a charity for troubled youths, The Second Mile, which prosecutors said he “had used . . . as his private hunting ground scouting for potential victims” (¶ 5). The indictment of the revered coach affected the community even before the trial, with the firing of PSU’s president, Graham B. Spanier, the firing of long-time head coach Joe Paterno, and criminal charges against the school’s athletic director and ...

The issue of collective bargaining first rose into public consciousness after the Supreme Court verdict in 2007 in favour of the BC health workers and their unions. In doing so it not only awarded the plaintiffs a $100 million in compensation but also recognized collective bargaining as a fundamental right protected by the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Collective Bargaining is defined as "the negotiating process that determines the terms and conditions of employment between an employer or employers' association and a collective group of employees, or their representatives". As a concept it is designed to protect the rights of individual ...

Part 1

Objective: in this critical analysis, you are expected to demonstrate an understanding of public health ethics and legal issues. Also, you are required to actively engage with the subject and come up with a substantial perspective on it.

Introduction

This critical analysis will outline the main purpose of the public health ethics and legal issues for protecting and upholding public health. Public policies and social programs are some of the aspects that constitute a good public health. Also, some patients with distinct issues contribute to the wellbeing of the public health, especially in a situation of unethical event regarding health ...

This paper will look into the impeachment of Bill Clinton. This move was instigated by the (HoR) House of Representatives because of two charges which were perjury and the hindrance of justice. These charges arose from his adulterous acts with Monica Lewinsky who was a former intern in the White House and several charges of sexual harassment. This move changed a lot on the issue of presidency. It went on to show that the presidency could be overturned. He was acquitted of the charges by the house of Senate on February 1999 (Washingtonpost.com: Clinton Accused, 1999). This paper will ...

If the police tap into the local telephone exchange of AT&T to know when a certain phone number becomes active with users without a warrant, the case will face a very difficult suppression motion. There is a safeguard against such processes; the Fourth Amendment. Hypothetically, if the police attempt to stake out a suspect’s location and try to get information whenever someone makes a call from the property, a warrant becomes mandatory. However, it is surprising the courts find that a warrant is unnecessary. The interpretation of the law should coexist along with the context in order to ...

The issue before the court in this case was whether this standard of proof was the proper standard to be used in determining retaliation or was the appropriate standard the “motivating factor” standard. Or more specifically, whether a plaintiff claiming retaliation can win a claim based on discrimination being a “motivating factor” for retaliation or must the plaintiff show that the discrimination was the reason for the retaliation. In addressing this issue, the United States Supreme Court determined that the standard of proof used to allege a claim for retaliation under Title VII must be the but for test ...

NAMEUNIVERSITY

Abstract
The aim of this essay is to work on a case of the mentally ill person, Mr. Fryer who was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia and was living on the streets. Mr. Fryer committed a violent murder while being mentally unstable. In this essay I will highlight the consequences of the case and work on it as the defense for the Mr. Fryer. I will choose my way of actions and explain the logic behind them as well as providing clarification of aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the crime, addressing the issue as a forensic psychology professional and explaining ...

Moore versus Regents of The University of California is considered a landmark case because it was the first time that a court was faced with the ethical issues associated with biotechnology research and practices, which until this point, had remained mostly theoretical.
In 1976, John Moore, a businessman from Seattle was diagnosed with hairy-cell leukaemia at The University of California-Los Angeles Medical Center by a well-known oncologist at the time, David W. Golde. As part of his treatment, Moore’s enlarged spleen was surgically removed, after which his disease went into remission .
It was when Moore became aware of ...

During ancient times, the Greeks would turn to the gods for advice and intervention when presented with a problem whether it was to bring the rain to save their crops so that their families could eat or in the case of Oresteia, to decide whether or not a person accused of murder was truly guilty. The goddess they often turned to for guidance was the goddess Themis whose “ability to foresee the future enabled her to become one of the oracles at Delphi, which in turn led to her establishment as the goddess of divine justice” (Swatt, “Themis, Goddess ...

The Triangle Shirtwaist Fire Trial is one of the significant trials in the history of America’s Industrial Revolution. It involved hundreds of factory workers who were exposed to an unsafe work environment and unjustly treated within the criminal justice system. Nevertheless, its aftermath resulted in an overhaul of the legislative and policy framework governing the safety of workers in their work environment and building codes.
On March 25, 1911 a deadly fire struck the eighth, ninth and tenth floors of the Asch building in New York resulting in a death toll of 146 people, 145 of whom were ...

Golub, Mark. "Plessy as "Passing": Judicial Responses to Ambiguously Raced Bodies in Plessy v. Ferguson." Law & Society Review, 39, no. 3 (2005): 563-600.

Synopsis

Homer Plessy’s decision to purchase a ticket as a white man, and to later confess that he is indeed black, was part of “a test case” conducted by the Creole community of New Orleans. As per the terms of the Louisiana Separate Car Act of 1890, Caucasians and persons of African descent were subject to traveling in different railway cars to serve the purposes of racial segregation. In the article, Golub quotes Plessy’ ...

1. The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act is a federal law that governs the Indian Gaming in order to provide security for the industry and restrict involvement from State governments. The Act signed by President Ronald Regan, provides financial stability to American Indian Governments and sets up a regulatory standard for all tribes to follow in the interest of fairness. The Act comprises of three classes. Class I has minor games such as raffles and conducted only during local festivals or ceremonies. The prizes awarded are in any range since the State Government cannot have any ceiling. The State officials ...

English

Euthanasia has always been a controversial social issue in the cultures around the world. It is associated with ethical issues as well as social consequences. The term Euthanasia itself means, mercy killing. It is the process of ending someone's life based on that person’s own wish. When a person wants to end his life because he is suffering from a terminal disease or some other weakening condition, Euthanasia is often recommended. In most of the states of the United States, euthanasia is considered illegal. However in many states including California, physician-assisted suicides are legalized based on the requirement ...

Re: Prosecutorial Disclosure of Evidence to Defense Counsel

Beginning in the 1960s, the Supreme Court heard a number of cases that transformed the world of criminal procedure. The common theme running through all of these cases is that the Court began to focus on balancing the defendant’s rights against that of the government in a criminal proceeding. One of the areas that were specifically addressed was whether the Constitution required the Prosecutor to disclose evidence that tends to be advantageous to the defense. While the Prosecutor and the defense are adversaries in a criminal court of law, the Supreme Court maintains that under some circumstances, the ...

Introduction

Impeachment refers to a political trail that is conducted in order to remove the President of the United States from office. “In American Constitution, the term impeachment refers to a trail initiated by the House of Representatives and conducted by the Senate” (p. 654). In other words, the House decides whether or not there are grounds to impeach the President and the Senate conducts the trial in order to discover a verdict. Impeachment is not something that has happened a lot throughout history. In fact, Congress has only had serious discussions of impeachment for three presidents: Andrew, Johnson, Richard ...