Rule Course Works Samples For Students

Bangladesh

- GDP per Capita = $2100
Real GDP growth rate = 6.1%
Population growth rate = 1.59%
- Growth rate in real GDP per capita = Real GDP growth rate – Population growth rate
Growth rate Real GDP = 6.1%-1.59% = 4.51%
- Use the 70 Rule (70/4.51)% = 15.5years

Brazil

- GDP per Capita = $12, 100
Real GDP growth rate = 0.9%
Population growth rate = 0.83%
- Growth rate in real GDP per capita = Real GDP growth rate – Population growth rate
Growth rate Real GDP =0.9%-0.83% =0.07%
- Use the 70 Rule (70/0.83)% = 84.3 years

China

- ...

The best evidence rule is codified in the Federal Rules of Evidence. Rule 1002 provides that, unless otherwise provided by the federal statutes, an original recording is required in order to prove its contents. At the same time, Rule 1003 states that the duplicate of the original recording is equally admissible unless there are genuine doubts as to the authenticity of the original piece of evidence. Rule 1004 allows not to require the original evidence if it is impossible to obtain the original by any available judicial process. The court may also admit the summary of the original evidence, ...

Statutory interpretation is the process by which courts and judges give meaning to enacted legislation and consequently apply it to a particular case. In the English as well as the Wales legal system, the doctrine of separation of powers prevails whereby Parliament is the supreme law maker. The Executive is charged with the responsibility of implementing the legislation as passed by Parliament while the Judiciary is the final arbiter which interprets legislation as enacted by Parliament. Thus, in tandem with the doctrine of separation of powers, the courts must keep within their ambit and ensure they do not arrogate to ...

The exclusionary rule was established by the Supreme Court in the holding in Weeks. United States. It was intended to reinforce the Constitutional Forth Amendment provision that guaranteed privacy rights. Its principle is to the effect that violation of procedural safeguards excluded evidence so gathered from the trial process.

However, the rule is not cast on stone and should be applied with exception, case in point the good faith exception. It is my contention that in the case of United States vs. Leon, the majority had a stronger argument. Reading the holding one appreciates the wisdom in the judgement delivered ...

The Second Temple Period marked a time during which significant changes occurred through the Jewish rule and foreign tenure. The weeping of Zion did not last for long since soon after the Babylonian kingdom had collapsed to the newly established empire of Persia, Cyrus, king of Persia declared a policy of religious freedom. This was at about 536 BCE that came about 520 years after the country had been destroyed. Cyrus at this time allowed the people who had fled from Judah to return to their homeland and rebuild their Temple. This saw only a small group of people return as the ...

Probably the main peculiarity of the warrantless vehicle searches cases is that the question of the existence of the probable cause is left to the discretion of the law enforcement officers. Police officers make their decisions on the basis of the information that is presented to them, and only they are in power to decide whether that information is trustworthy and reliable enough to constitute a probable cause for the arrest or search.

Rule of Law

In Brinegar vs. United States the Supreme Court paid a particular attention to the question of existence of a probable cause in case of a warrantless search of a vehicle. The ...

Uganda was a British protectorate. The Buganda agreement (1900) defined the boundaries of the kingdom of Buganda. These boundaries were extended eventually to include the whole of the British Uganda protectorate. This agreement gave Buganda monarchy a large degree of their internal autonomy within the Uganda protectorate.

Githaka refers to an assemblage of land, which was owned by a sub clan (mbari). The members of the sub-clan were entitled to own portions of each clan’s githaka. The Kikuyu tribe of Kenya had a system of land holding based on the githaka. The githaka was hereditary passed on from one generation to another.The ...

Souq.com is the leading online platform in the Arab world where there is free trade. The revenue model of www.souq.com leans towards both the commercial and the retail sectors. Since its establishment, it is today the largest online shopping mall in the Arab world. A large number of suppliers enable Souq.com to provide a variety of products to consumers. The company generates by selling numerous product varieties to clients. Some of the product categories that the company deals with include; electronics, baby items, perfumes and fragrances, phones and accessories, etc. The company offers several advantages to its clients including; free ...

Revenue model is a design strategy of e-commerce used to demonstrate models of sales, company products, services and revenue forecasts of accompany. Revenue models also play an important role in value appropriation. It complements business model design just like product design can be complemented by pricing strategy. The statements of cash flow in accompany can thus be demonstrated using revenue model through the development of account receivable.

The first website, that is, www.souq.com comprises of revenue model that can be used for online shopping. It includes selling Microsoft products such as Windows ultimate and other services. The revenue model in ...

- What is Lipinski’s Rule of Five and why is it important to drug design?

Lipinski's rule of five is popular as the Rule of five (RO5) or Pfizer's rule of five. It is a standing rule that evaluates drug likeness in determining whether chemical compounds that have certain biological or pharmacological activities have properties that make it a probable orally active drug for human consumption. This rule is on observing that many medication drugs have lipophilic molecules (Anastas 56). This means that the rule is applicable in drug discovery when lead structures that are pharmacologically active optimized. This increases the activity and compound selectivity insuring proper maintenance of drug-like physicochemical properties as illustrated ...

The three-strikes rule in American law is often associated with drug users, but in reality, the rule varies from state to state. Usually, the three-strikes rule states that offenders who are guilty of more than two serious offenses-- usually felonies-- can be sentenced to life in prison (Stanford University Law School, 2013). These offenses may be violent offenses like child abuse or rape, or they may be non-violent offenses like drug possession or possession with intent to distribute (Staples, 2012). The reason why so many people decry the three-strikes rule as unfair or even potentially unethical is because the ...

Introduction

The West Tankers litigation, especially the decision of European Court of Justice, has raised many questions as to the issue of enforceability of arbitration agreements in EU Member States. The Court, by its decision, has extended the scope of application of the Brussels regulation to the arbitration agreements, and precluded English courts from issuing of an anti-suit injunction aimed at prevention of any judicial proceedings in other Member State when such proceeding clearly violates the arbitration agreement. In the following article, I would like to contemplate on the possible consequences of the court`s ruling as to the enforceability ...

Three potential ground for objections to interrogatories are: privilege, relevance, and overbroad. I think that the three stated objections are very commonly used in pending litigation for a variety of reasons. The privilege objection is common because of the sheer volume of communication with an attorney, furthermore, the evidentiary value of a privileged communication is high so something potentially privileged is likely to be asked for. Relevance is a common objection because when attempting to litigate a case, attorneys might take a ‘shot-gun’ approach to discovery in order to build their case and ask for more information than is strictly necessary to prove a ...

Amanda provides a broad analysis of evidence and the rules regarding admission of evidence in regards to relevance, relying on Article IV of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Amanda further highlights Article VIII of the Federal Rules of Evidence for an elucidation of the rules regarding hearsay evidence presented in court.

In relation to the first fact pattern, where Edward’s attorney was questioning Quincy’s physician, the analysis is correct. Rule 803(4) provides that statements made for medical diagnosis or treatments are not hearsay statements. As the causal factors leading to the fall are directly relevant for the ...

The ‘exclusionary rule’ is a rule based on the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution which prohibits unlawful search and seizure. The exclusionary rule mandates that evidence seized in violation of the terms of the Fourth Amendment is not admissible in court and should be excluded at trial; it is an attempt to deter police misconduct and prevent them from usurping the constitutional rights of citizens. It is a rule which was originally expressed in Week v. United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914); in 1961 the Supreme Court made the exclusionary rule applicable to the states in the case ...

Part 1

- In what ways did the video "The Crisis of Credit" demonstrate the failure of the banking industry's Fiduciary Relationship to investors and home owners?

The video explains a worldwide financial disaster that effected everyone. It started on the burst of the dot com bubble when the federal reserve of the United States decreased the interest rate to 1%. This value dramatically dropped the investment level because of the reduced ROI. This action made banks to take more and more loans from the Federal Reserve. The leverage increased as it became very easy to return a loan, so the demand for credit increased rapidly.

The banks took a lot of credit, and they were easily able to payback and made a lot of profits. Investors saw this as ...

According to Rule 801 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, Hearsay is a statement that is either: (1) the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing; and (2) a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement. Essentially, hearsay testimony is 2nd hand knowledge that if presented in court would violate a parties sixth amendment right to confront a witness against him. Allowing hearsay testimony would provide a backdoor for admitting evidence that could not be appropriately challenged by the opposing side.

In the first fact pattern, Quincy’s physician is testifying ...

History of the Habsburg Family

The Hapsburg domination of the Austrian republic started early in the 11th century where the house of Habsburg started developing their empire. The empire was made up of several estates controlled and ruled by the Habsburg family. The monarchy was made up of Germans, Czechs, Bohemians, Croats, Slovenes, Dalmatians, Hungarians, Poles and the Italians who made up the Habsburg Monarchy. The house of Habsburg produced the kings who ruled this empire from the early 11th century through to the 18th century when the monarchy became extinct (Armour, 2012). This was after a series of events that weakened the empire leading ...

Scenario I

According to the business judgment rule the takeover is not hostile. It is legal since the AgroVate’s board has turned down the offer of Bijoux on grounds that the organization was still on good hand to improve its widget finishing division. The business judgment rule supports the idea that the director and the board have made the final decision of turning down Bijoux offer. The business judgment rule states that any informed decision that has been reached by the AgroVate’s board and shall not be overturned by any means not unless it does not support or stands ...

The rule against hearsay provides that a statement made out of court may not be admitted into evidence in order to prove the validity of the assertion made. The Federal Rules of Evidence provide the definition, limitations, and exceptions to the rule against hearsay in Article VIII, rules 801-807.

As concerns the first scenario, Quincy’s physician is on the witness stand and is asked by Edward’s attorney whether or not Quincy told him that he fell because he lost his equilibrium as a result of dizziness. This is not hearsay for a number of reasons. Firstly, under rule 801(d) ...

Introduction

Ideally the investigating officer clearly violated the Brady Rule. The officer would instead have had relied on the fourth witness, a situation that would provide more and reliable information regarding the suspect. It will be realized any information obtained from witnesses provided that they are mentally fit and unbiased should actually be relied on since people may have differing views concerning an event.

Studies extend to reveal that the Brady Rule requires all prosecutors to reveal materially exculpatory evidence within the possession of the government to the defense. Generally, the evidence that the prosecutor is actually required to reveal with ...

The Structure of the U.S. Banking System

Introduction

During the recent global financial crisis, critics have posed the question: does the repeal of Glass-Steagall have a positive or negative effect on the banking industry? Review of the structure of the U.S. banking system has culminated in some consensus that the U.S. government should bring back the Glass-Steagall Act. This is consistent with reporting by the FDIC (Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation), that more than one hundred twenty banking institutions have failed between 2007 and 2009, and this was largely in part due to high risk investments (i.e. mortgage backed securities).

First enacted ...

1. The underlying form is basically the form that the speaker associates it with. So, for example, in English, we have several different ways of forming the plural. So, we have different plural endings for /kæts/, /dɒɡz/ and /hɔrsɨz// (cats, dogs, and horses) based on the phonetic environment that they occur in. But we still perceive the underlying form to be /s/, as reflected in our writing system. The underlying forms, in this case, /s/, is expressed as the surface forms, or variants, when they are surrounded by phonemes which directly affect how they are ...

The Miranda warning is a rule which provides that the police must give criminal suspects in the custody of the law enforcement officers, in the United States, a warning before they can ask questions about what took place during the crime. The rule is exclusionary in that any evidence that is obtained with the violation of the Miranda rules can be successfully suppressed in a court of law. The rule was mandated by the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in 1966 in the case of Miranda v Arizona. This decision was made in order to protect the Fifth ...

The term de minimis is an abbreviated form of a Latin term “de minimis non curat lex” which loosely states that the law does not care for small things. It refers to the legal doctrine where a court adjudicating over a matter refuses to be drawn into trivial matters or to consider petty matters. This common law concept was expressed in the English decision of the “Reward” in the year 1818 and also restated by Justice Robert Seigmann of the Illinois Appeal Court in the case of People v Durham.In a law suit coming for adjudication, the court applies this doctrine ...

Procedure and Facts

The two plaintiffs, who were minors, and their parents, commenced liability proceedings against the defendant, which was a pharmaceutical company. The plaintiffs were born with limb defects which they contended was not natural but rather by their mother’s use of Benedictin, a drug manufactured by the defendants. The claim was lodged at the Ninth Circuit court. The arguments from the opposing parties in the case elucidated differing opinions as to the more just, appropriate and reliable criteria for the admissibility of scientific evidence available. There existed an earlier common law rule, the Frye rule, which held scientific evidence must be ...

Q1. Describe the term work-to-rule? How is work-to-rule utilized when employees are unhappy with working conditions? Provide specific examples of employees using work to rule in the workplace.

This is a less destructive form of strike where workers go beyond the required rules stipulate d by their contract and follow the required regulations just to cause a slowdown. Given that the employees follow the required rules they are not susceptible to disciplinary action by the employers. Some of the known examples of work-slow-to rule applies include when the police refuse to give citation or when nurses refuse to pick phone calls.

The rule is sometimes used by workers to express their dissatisfaction with the working condition imposed by their employers. The employees remain in the job and perform all ...

HIPAA

HIPAA initials for Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act enacted in 1996. It was established by the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information with the main role of protecting the health information of patients. The chief objective of this act is to protect the health information of the patients while advocating for quality health care. The act also permits proper use of information while safeguarding the privacy of individuals seeking treatment and healing.

Privacy Rules

The Privacy Rule, also Administrative Simplification Rules, relate to health plans and to any healthcare provider who transfers health data inform of electronic gadget. ...

1. Discuss the reality and significance of the Civil War in U.S. history. What were the factors that led to the outbreak of war? What were the long-term consequences of the conflict? Discuss Lincoln s role. What did emancipation mean to both sides in the war?

The reality of the US Civil War lies with the then economic and social differences between the Northern and Southern parts of the US, where Northern Federal states, grew industrialized, welcoming new cultures, while the Southern confederate states maintained an antiquated social order, and agriculture, utilizing the slaves in their farms. These socio ...

Introduction

Security systems are undergoing development with the development of cryptographic protocols that help to secure these communications channels. There have been extensive researches that have been carried out to come up with better security mechanisms that will secure information systems. A cryptographic protocol is a protocol which makes use of cryptography so that they are able to achieve their goals, these goals could include sending private or public keys over the network. There are protocols that are used for securing security systems. This paper will focus on two protocols, NRL analyzer and Bellare-Rogaway model (Tanenbaum, 2003).

NRL analyzer

How it works

It ...

1. Overview of Topic
This paper aims at discussing the question of the sovereignty of the British Parliamentary system based on the outcome of Jackson v. Attorney General 2005.According the constitutional provisions of the British legislative system there lacks a clear line between the extent of interference between the House of Lords and that of the House of Commons. The ruling of Jackson v. Attorney General 2005 supports this hypothesis based on the structure of arguments presented by the Jury in giving the verdict of this case. This paper intends to use the outcome of this case to determine ...

DNA testing serves numerous purpose the present world; these purposes are primarily medical and police work. The medical applications of DNA testing are mainly to identify probable conditions and in paternity tests. In police work, on the other hand, DNA testing obtains evidence from the investigations. Every individual's DNA is unique from everybody else, the only exception that emerges in this is the case of Identical twins. DNA is present in all of the body and even in the body fluids such as semen, saliva, and blood. As such, DNA is becoming a major part of apprehending suspects and as ...

The employment at will doctrine dictates that, employers are at volition to decide when and under what parameters to dismiss a worker. In this context, employers are at no obligation by the state to bring on board the reasons that actuated their actions into place. However, it should be noted that, the actions by the employers should not be illegal. In the United States of America, the doctrine was adopted so as to override on the circumstances that were in place in as far as the position of employers was concerned (Miller, 2009). In this regard, employers merged up and ...

The war between the United States of America and Iraq

The war between the United States and Iraq of March 2003 to 2005 is still a misunderstood aspect and is a question of what exactly caused the George W. Bush government to invade Iraq. A number of explanations have been given, but it remains a matter of intense controversy.

Discussion

The events following the 11th September, 2001, otherwise known as 9/11, initiated an ideology in the Bush administration. The US government’s key policy makers concluded that overthrowing Saddam Hussein and his regime were the only way to strike a blow to radical Islamic terrorism world over. A major concern was how to eliminate ...

Self-Determination of use of Market Value by Banks: Good or Bad?

As per the new Exposure Draft of FASB, financial institutions are now relaxed from the use of fair value in their financial statements. As per this new rule, if the bank intended to keep the asset until it was paid off, it would be carried on the financial statements at cost price, and the value will not fall or rise when the market prices are changed. The proposal was welcome by the banks which were once unhappy with the proposal of 2010 regarding use of market value as they(banks) contented that since market values of financial securities had ...

- The Ibadis believed that Caliphs were tyrants.
- They disassociated themselves with all of the Caliph’s except `Umar b. `Abd al-`Aziz.
- When Mu`awiyah became Caliph a new era of Islam with Umayyad reign began.
- The independence of Oman was expected to change due to the new rule.
- Oman and the new Caliph had no relationship at all.
- The rulers of the two nations did not see each other as any kind of threat so they did not see sense in using valuable military resources in any kind ...

- There were a number of similarities between China under the Han and the Roman Empire. Why do you think that was so? Was it simply historical accident? Do those aspects of empire imply some sort of empire-building process common throughout the world? Why or why not?

China and Rome were both land empires, based mostly on agriculture, as were all other empires before the industrial revolution over the last 200 years. These two empires developed along similar lines even though they had no contact with each other, given the extremely slow communications and travel times of that era. They all seem to have had very similar caste systems, with slaves and peasants at the bottom, an aristocratic-military caste and an emperor or king at the apex (Adler and Pouwels, 2008, pp. 169-70). Both the Han and the Roman emperors also claimed to rule by divine ...

Why, according to Xenophon, are human beings so difficult to rule?

It is, indeed, difficult to rule human beings. Such is because of the fact that human beings possess the ability to reason, which enables them to become highly susceptible to their desires and decisions. In that case, they become very hard to rule because they do not follow instructions coming from others apart from them right away. For them to follow someone who is sending out orders to them, they have to use their reasoning powers to discern whether such orders are compatible with their line of thinking. Thus, an effective ruler of humans is one that possesses great ...

ECO/365

In this paper, the student discusses the different market structures with focus on the oligopoly market. The student identified he food processing industry as an oligopoly industry dominated by PepsiCo, Kraft Foods, and Nestle. Moreover, competitive strategies are presented for the maximization of profits in the long run as well as the strategies that the chosen organization (PepsiCo) might consider in maximizing profits.

I chose the food processing industry for the purpose of discussion in this paper. There are three world leading companies under this industry namely, PepsiCo, Nestle and Kraft Foods. It is stated in the book Rule ...

The primary difference between a motion for summary judgment and a motion for judgment as a matter of law at the close of the evidence is:

In considering the summary judgment record, what attitude should the court adopt in evaluating the materials offered?

Smith sues Jones for negligence and assault resulting from a car accident, where Jones hit Smith with his car as Smith was crossing the street. The case goes to trial and both issues are fully litigated. The court finds for Smith on the negligence issue, but does not rule in the assault issue. Collateral estoppel will bar Smith from relitigating the assault issue in a second lawsuit because both issues arose from the same incident, and because both ...

1. Outline the categories of violence as described by Jamil Salmi.

According to Salmi, the phenomenon of violence has many characteristics, with particular causes per characteristic and with particular causational agents per cause. Violence also exists in several forms, including direct violence, indirect violence, repressive violence, and alienating violence.

Direct violence is characterized by any physical, in-person act causing intended harm. In this category would be included A) any act resulting in death (homicide, genocide, infanticide); and B) any “coercive or brutal” (Module 6, 44) at threatening or resulting in physical or psychological damage or suffering—including rape, spousal abuse, political imprisonment, for example.

Indirect violence is characterized by ...

The case sits within the domain of evidence as the procedural law in application and of course the substantive law remains criminal law. However, as to the defence of the three, this paper shall give advice within the law of evidence and highlight the evidential issues that should be brought forward in the defence of each of three accused persons. It should be appreciated that the evidential issues shall be substantially guided by the Police and Criminal Evidence Act of 1984. However, in nexus to this Act, the evidential issues shall also be guided by the wider body of ...

In contemporary interconnected and interdependent world, meaning comprehension of one country in the region might resolve the problems diplomacy or military actions could not resolve. Thus, it is no longer enough to know only geographical specifics of the country and formal data. Even knowledge of history of the country without a proper context would not be enough for policy and decision-makers to make the right choice between actions and noninterference. In this regard, culture becomes a crucial element for comprehension of the situation in its complexity and interdisciplinary framework.

Although, during the Cold War, culture was of little importance and the ...

Question one: Explosives

The Oklahoma City bombing occurred at nine o’clock during the day in April 1995. It saw the bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Building. Two critical safety steps that were essential in the management of the disaster entailed the establishment of a safety perimeter that would limit the extent to which the first respondents could reach and the immediate withdrawal of the trapped bodies from the danger zones. The former essentially contributes in accountability and management of the respondents. It should be noted that the respondents’ desire to save anybody in the disaster must never escalate to levels that ...

12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men, made in the year 1957 is a well acclaimed American drama giving new ideas about the workings of Jury and the psychology of jury members. Due to some constrictions imposed by American Judicial system it becomes an easier said than done task for Jury members to make a decision, their one decision can make a big effect if all the pros and cons are not probed of a case. The film has many salient features which inspired other film makers from across the world to make several movies and plays taking this idea. Several methods of consent ...

Part 1
- Race in Mexico and Peru
Native Americans were comprised of indigenous tribes such as Maya, Inca and Aztecs. They inhabited largely Mexico and Peru. Before the arrival of Spanish conquistadors, the ancient civilizations lived in peace and harmony and were able to establish local empires that were rich in culture and traditions. With the arrival of Spaniards in 15-16th century, the civilizations were deemed to suffer either from diseases brought externally or by bloody conquests. With the engagement of Europeans, the African slave trade was introduced to the American continent. The population was mixed ...

P and I Rule Book. According to the American P and I Club Rule Book, there is a clause about claims that are payable at the discretion of the Directors. Section 20 of the Rule book, titled “Ominbus” clause outlines that there may be circumstances where the Directors may choose to pay on claims that they collectively decide should be paid.

If the liability is not excluded elsewhere in any of the previous nineteen clauses, then the Directors can choose to pay a claim. This seems to be a fair way for the organization to establish that there may be unusual ...

Art is a collection of different human events and the results of those events. This project emphasizes on the paintings done by different artists in America and what the artists had in mind during the time when they did these paintings. The paintings are found in the statutory hall. There are varied emotions depicted by the artists that define the history of America before independence. These paintings are of much importance even to the current generation and help one to understand better the history of America by just having a look at the images. These places the images in their immediate ...

Introduction

With respect to law of torts, any action carried out intentionally and that results in causing either physical or emotional injury to another person qualifies as an intentional tort. On the other hand, negligence tort entails causing harm or injury to a third party as a result of personal carelessness. According to Arthur and Barner (2007), civil law requires that every individual conduct his or her activities in a manner that induces no harm to surrounding persons. In this context, the need to conduct one’s affairs in a safe manner constitutes the element of duty. Failure to act safely and within expected ...

Rob and Bunny Sherman want to file a suit against the Church of the Divine Light. They allege that one year ago, their 15 year old son called Rob Jr., was coerced into staying in the church. He was threatened by being told that if he left, he would be thrown into the eternal fires of hell. He was brainwashed and began believing that the church was his new family. He was also told to demand money from his parents to cater for his upkeep. Rob Jr. stayed in the church for a period of approximately six months. Rob Sr. and ...

According to Madison, a 'faction' is a number of citizens, who could be in majority or minority of the whole population who are united by a common passion, interests as disseminated by the authority over the rights of other citizens or to the summation of interests of the larger community.
2.
The two methods of curing the mischief of faction are through controlling its effects of removing its causes. On the other hand, the methods of removing causes of 'faction' are; through the destruction of the liberty of which the faction exists and by giving every citizen the same passions, ...

A good leader is not one thing. To be a good leader a person must be capable of being many things as the situation calls for it. In question is the decisions made by a particularly manager I once had when I worked as a waiter in a Mexican restaurant. This is an example of a bad leader, but by identifying the flaws in a particular manager’s leadership style, it is possible to use this as a counterexample to understanding what good leadership is.

One of the allures of the Mexican restaurant was the fact that patrons could get unlimited chips and salsa. On an average ...

Britons have for the longest time been opposed to the idea of being under a monarch rule. They are not proud; rather they are ashamed of their country. Most of the Britons find the hype and funfair associated with the royal family as a major inconvenience on the country as a whole. What most people outside Britain do not realize is, Britons do not oppose the monarch rule simply for kicks, but it is because of the intense love they have for their country, and the need to end the humiliation of a Hanoverian monarch that is constantly suppressing strides towards a democratic state. ...

Introduction

The report includes a speculative summary which is highly rendered by the project submitter. The report includes the rules and exemption to work with an accommodated job in United Kingdom. The summary and the report includes the rules and regulations which are necessary as per working in the UK company, and it also discuss about the Tax redemption charges as per the incomes basis of an individual. The report even includes the taxation of any employee working in a UK based company. The rules and regulations are also jotted down to make the project analyst know about the main factual finding ...

In the debate regarding Genetically Modified Foods, ethical concerns and scientific uncertainties have played different roles in the US and the European Union. While the regulatory and rule-making system in the US is centralized, the regulatory system in the EU is decentralized. However, rule enforcement among regulatory agencies of continental European states is more centralized. The European Union’s precautionary principle when it comes to avoiding technologies used in the production of genetically modified foods, particularly when the long-term consequences culture, health and the environment are unknown, is preferable. This traditional rule helps European Unions to exercise safety until ...

Nazism just as it is fascism is a political ideology based on “political behavior that is obsessed with the idea of community decline, humiliation, or victimhood by compensatory cults of unity, energy and purity.” In this ideology, there is a mass based party of committed nationalists, militants that work with traditional elites to abandon democratic ideals and employ the use of violence to cleanse the society

According to Herf, Nazism is a political ideology that took root in Europe in the early twentieth century to mid twentieth century in Europe. In general terms, Nazism is often classified as a right wing political ...

1.It is true that agriculture has been one of the greatest inventions in the history of mankind due to the impacts it has brought to the world. Due to the competition between humans and animals agriculture has brought dependence and food security against the ever diminishing natural resources. Agriculture led to the invention of fire that has had substantial positive effects on the human livelihood in terms of domestication and other uses of fire. The invention of transport and communication means has also had big and positive impacts on the human life to a bigger magnitude. These inventions have enabled ...

Introduction

Workforce analysis is the procedure that different types of business organizations are able to review their staffing trends and their data which enables them to determine their future needs to hire new staff and also their current hiring procedures. This procedure enables the organization to determine exactly what kind of experience, skills and knowledge that they require from their staff. The right kind of workforce will be able to go an extra mile to ensure that the organization meets its goals and objectives. Workforce analysis requires the backing of a strong administrative and management leadership. This management should have the vision ...

The U.S. Constitution is quite explicit when it comes to the powers of government. In the document, the powers of the federal government are enumerated, or listed, and the document then states that those powers not enumerated are reserved to the states and local governments. (Chemerinsky, 1998) This provision was put in place to limit the Federal Government’s involvement in day-to-day issues. (Chemerinsky, 1998)

The Federal government, despite the intent of the framers of the constitution to separate state and federal powers, has been encroaching steadily on those powers since the constitution was ratified. (Chemerinsky, 1998) One way ...

Criminal Law

1. Parol evidence rule refers to the evidence of previous or simultaneous oral rule that written contracts may not be varied, contradicted, or changed by any previous or contemporaneous oral declarations. Parol evidence is admitted when a written contract does not include or contradicts the oral understanding reached by the parties. Under the parole evidence rule, when the court finds that that written contract has represented the final and complete statement of the parties to an agreement, it will no longer allow either party to submit parole evidence (Miller, 2011, p.187).

2. The statute of frauds refers to the requirement ...