Duty College Essays Samples For Students

Business Law

Karla should be liable for Leroy’s extra expenses in providing for the hogs. Karla breached a written contract with Leroy after failing to transfer the ownership of the land before the date they had contracted or rather agreed upon (May 1). Essentially, the delayed transfer of ownership should be perceived as a unilateral breach, this was apparently acquiesced. In a unilateral breach, one party between the two legally competent parties pays his or her acquaintance to perform a certain duty upon which the other party is obliged to transfer back the funds once the duty has been accomplished (McKendrick & Cohen, 2005).

...

Introduction

Criminal Procedure is the legal process of engaging state or government rules in outlying the procedures followed by law enforcing agencies in enforcing the criminal laws of the state. Criminal procedure hence encompasses the whole process of ensuring that crime offenders are brought before law and charged if found guilty and if not are acquitted (Esmein 21). Criminal law therefore includes sections such as investigative, evidence and adjudicative procedure that ensures non-tolerances to crime in the society. In this case, I am going to discuss the Investigative crime procedure.

Discussion

Investigative criminal procedure is the primary case in ...

Abstract

Video games have evolved a thousand times since their first introduction to consumers. They have increased not only in price but in intensity. Violence seems to be a central theme in some games and with that there is the consequential impact on today’s youth. This paper does not aim to analyze how kids and adults value (or fail to value) life after hours of killing in video games. It aims to simply describe two popular selections that have quite a few things in common, despite their obvious differences. Call of Duty allows for traveling through time from World War II to ...

Philosophy of Religion – Pascal’s Wager

The question of existence of God has been a bone of contention among many philosophers ever since philosophy existed. Earlier the arguments in favor of God dominated, but later, close to the time of modernity, it appears as if arguments against God’s existence have dominated, irrespective of the validity and plausibility of the arguments. However, even in the modern times, many philosophers tried to defend the existence of God. Among those Blaise Pascal was also one whose argument became famous with the name of Pascal’s wager. The main idea of the argument was that one must wager for ...

In Ayn Rand’s version of ethics, called objectivism, the individual is motivated by morality to place his/her individual interests above any others. Rand states the highest moral principle is the attainment of happiness, and that any endeavor that elevates someone or something that the individual does not value is irrational. Sacrificing something or someone of value to self in order to preserve something or someone not of value to self is an act of immorality.

In an example of objectivism, Rand tells the story of a man who has the option to save his wife at the expense of ...

Introduction

Building a reputation as a better professional, is one of the most intrinsic components that one can ensure in the world of careers. There are numerous rewards that come with building a good reputation as a professional. One of such issues has all to do with raising an individual’s potential and stature in the job market. On the other hand, working with others from different cultural backgrounds has become eminent in the modern dispensation. Due to increased diversification in the corporate world, it has become clear that people from different cultural backgrounds at one given point have to find themselves in a single ...

What is a Tort and how does tort liability differ from criminal liability?

Torts are wrongful actions that may result to injuries or harm to another person or the person’s properties. These wrongful actions may provide ground for constitution of claim by the affected party. The main goal of tort law is to provide relief in case of damages sustained and, prevent others from committing related actions (Simons, n.d.).
Tort liability and criminal liability have substantive differences. While tort liability may result in punishment that mainly involves monetary payment of damages, criminal liability may result in punishment that involves both jail terms and, monetary payments. Additionally, in determining criminal liability, ...

Facts

This is a case of Byrne (P), an ordinary citizen walking in front of a flour shop which was under the ownership of Boadle (D) when a barrel containing some baking materials fell from the defendant’s window, directly hitting the plaintiff and making him sustain serious personal physical injuries. The plaintiff filed for charges against Boadle before the court under the grounds of negligence of duty.
There were several people who witnessed the incident which caused the plaintiff to sustain injuries, including some of the defendant’s flour shop employees. Aside from the obvious and legal medical services-backed evidences of ...

It is widely accepted that the men and women accepted into American’s military are upstanding citizens. They are the best and the brightest the country has to offer. As such, there are rules that they must adhere by while they are in uniform to ensure that they give off this quality. They must look neat, clean, and orderly. Hair must be cut evenly and in a timely manner. Men growing facial hair may only grow mustaches that do not exceed the width of their lips; no beards, long hair, or shaggy sideburns are tolerated. If a woman wears her hear ...

Business and Organizational Security Management

Business and Organizational Security Management

Any business and organizational security manager can attest and confirm; contracts are an extensive part of protective services. Services being provided by contract firms are increasingly diversifying into areas like scheduling and training, risk assessment, attendance, and time, the use of contracts will continue to regulate the provision of protective services. Contracts refer to agreements between two or more parties with regards to performance of a particular act and legally binding or enforceable. For these agreements to result to a contract, they must not be an invitation to negotiate or mere offers. Contracts are legally binding ...

Unethical behavior by Correctional personnel:

The correction personnel have a role to play in taking care of the well being of prisoners. Most of the times, the ethics of taking care of the inmates is always complicated. The prisoners have a low social status which makes them excluded and marginalized from the common mainstream of the society. This paper outlines the examples of unethical behavior conducted by the corrections personnel and considers how the corrections personnel are expected to behave and the procedures they should follow when handling inmates.
The correction personnel have a tendency of making the inmates experience stigma and discrimination right behind the ...

I was doing my house job at life care rehab when Sue got hired at the post of nurse in the hospital. She beckoned to be lethargic and anarchic when I met her first time. Everyone was staggered to see a nurse with non hailing gestures and chaotic behavior at first day of her job. She was charged at duty in general ward for night. Next day of her joining she came late for duty and it turned into her routine to come late every day without any excuse.
She was an irresponsible and careless nurse. She was fired ...

Compulsory voting is that system of voting in elections where voters are forced to attend to a polling place or obliged to vote in elections. In the event that an eligible voter does not vote on the elections day or does not attend the police place, he/she may be subjected to punitive measures like community services or fines or even imprisonment. The main logic behind compulsory voting is to ensure that there is large voter turnout during elections. This will be an indication that the winning candidates during the population should clearly represent a majority of the population and not only a ...

Introduction

Human right activism is the act of campaigning to familiarize and protect the rights of people within a country or internationally. Human right activism has been a lead goal of social workers and Non-governmental Organizations within American and all over the world. It encompasses all manner of protecting human rights and life. On the social aspect, human right activism tends to speaks on behalf of the oppressed who are the casualties of barbaric authorities of their motherland. In so say, human activism is identified as a unique career that is ordained respect for the risk they are exposed to. Several issues have ...

Introduction

The Taming of the Shrew is one of the Shakespearean plays that are not traditionally taught in English courses. However, its lively plot and interesting characters make for a remarkable introduction to the Bard. This is because the story is mostly about various “courting” couples, which can be a lively topic as it elicits the timeless battle between the sexes. However, there are other themes and meanings which are explored in the play. The induction scene is an important part of this play because it shows how important different senses, particularly sight, are to humans. The induction scene begins with a drunken ...

Unethical Insider Trading

Insider Trading refers to any insider i.e an individual or group of people who have material information which is not available to the general public, and engage in trading of securities, for which they seek to gain benefits. Thus, whenever a corporate insider wants to buy or sell shares withing the firm where he works, he is most likely conducting unethical behavior and following ethical issues might raise because of his activities:

Asymmetry of Information:

Whenever a corporate insider indulge in buying or selling stocks based on insider information, it is considered to be unethical because all the participants to the market do not ...

Importance of Acting Lawfully when Working as a Nurse

Arguably, nursing is one of the professions that require a lot of care not only because it entails dealing with the life of people, but also the high chances of facing lawsuits due to failure to follow rules and regulations (Burgess, 2008). Nurses are required to take extra care in the manner they handle issues that pertains to their patients. Legally, nurses owe their patients a duty of care, which could lead to legal actions if this duty is violated (Forrester & Griffiths, 2010). As a nurse, it is imperative to act lawfully in various roles and responsibilities. This requires understanding of issues ...

Answer 1)

Securities Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission have an important role to play in the US Economy. While the function and objetcivbe of SEC is to protect theinvestors by ensuring that all the public listed companies provide fair and accurate financial information through their mandatory SEC Filings every year. It also ensures order and efficiency in capital markets which facilitate capital formation in US economy. Thus, the approach of SEC, assure that the securities market in US Capital Market are fairly traded, which helps the investor to take high- risk gambles and allows them to make sound financial ...

The case Praesal v. Johnson.
- Issue
This case revolves an accident that saw Terri Lynn Praesel die due to Ronald Peterson fault that had an epileptic confiscation. The issue revolves the claims by the Praesel’s family that argues that the doctor who knew about the recent Peterson epileptic illness failed to notify the authorities that Peterson should not drive. As a result, her husband and mother filed a case against three of the victims physicians namely Dr. Raymond Johnson, Waller, and the Sadler Clinic. They felt that these physicians acted negligently due to their failure to warn ...

Analysis of a Negligent Tort

Introduction
On December 13, 2014, the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) posted information concerning a recall for UVEX bicycle helmets. According to the CPSC, the helmets, under the recall number 15-045, have been recalled by their German manufacturer UVEX Sports GmbH due to a risk of head injury. More specifically, the reason for the recall states that there is a problem with the helmets chinstrap which is used to secure the helmet to a riders head. The chinstrap can fail allowing the helmet to slip or fall off the rider’s head. The potential risks of this are that it may ...

Background of the Titanic

The Titanic carried 2,227 people before the ship sank. The sinking of the ship can be attributed to the negligence of the captain of the ship. Before the occurrence of the instance, the titanic ship was warned six times of sea ice on 14 April but unfortunately, it travelled at a maximum speed towards the sighted iceberg. After it approached the region, the captain’s efforts did not work since titanic failed to turn quickly as it was required.
It was not until the captains of the ship realized that the ship was to starting to sink than ...

The U.S. Government
The executive office of the president was established by Franklin Roosevelt. Its responsibilities ranges from communication of the president’s message to the people of America so as to promote the trade interests of the country abroad. It is overseen by the chief of staff in the white house. This has been a home for most of the president’s closest advisors. The executive office that will be under discussion in this paper is the Department of Defense.

The mission of the DOD is to ensure that the military forces needed to prevent war as well ...

It is wrong to steal, and children learn this from an early age. But what if a parent was unable to find work and as a result did not have any money to buy groceries for their children? Would it be okay in this situation to steal food from a grocery store even though it is wrong to steal. This question is an ethical question. I believe, as I will develop in this essay, that it is okay to steal from a grocery store. This question, in some senses, is a silly question; very few people would agree that a parent should let their children ...

Abstract

Medication errors are still experienced in clinical settings in spite of the current technological advancements. Nurses play a crucial role in the provision of care including medical therapy to patients. In line with this, they ought to be trained on how to avoid medication errors. In this paper, a case scenario in which a nurse administers wrong vaccines to two patients with similar names is assessed. In addition, it gives strategies that can be used to prevent the occurrence of such a medication error. Nursing leadership, minimization of communication barriers between patients and nurses, a decent duty delegation process and the championship of patients’ ...

The Anishinaabe is a group of native North American people consisting of the Ojibwa and Odawa. The name Anishinaabe stands for people who are on the right path to the creator or the good people or the upright people. Traditional records called the wiigwaasabak which are scrolls indicate that the Anishinaabeg speakers originated from the east coast. The Anishinaabeg says that their original homeland was a place called Turtle Island. The name was from the belief of the people that North America as a continent was the back of a great mysterious turtle. The Anishinaabe believes themselves to be the descendants of the ...

Through the succession of the six paradigms, there has been a development in the public administration field. The public administrationists have gone through the reexamination in the field. This lies with the fact that the field has been going through a drastic change from its past (Henry, 1975). Not every person is capable of following the rules setup to guide a particular function. However, the city managers have been in a position to follow the paradigm changes as put across by Henry. The paradigms that the these city managers have been able to follow include;
Paradigm 1 which related to politics and ...

( Summary)
Justice is one pre-requisite for the common good, the others being solidarity and freedom. Common good requires an understanding that human beings depend upon one another for happiness. Common good cannot be achieved if some sections of the society are marginalized. Only a united society can have solidarity. The good of one individual depends on the good of another individual and vice versa. Hence, every individual must be just towards the other. According to Thomas Aquinas, justice is the greatest virtue. One, who has a sense of justice, directs his actions towards the good of others. Every individual has ...

Technology is a main part of our lives today. With the development of technology to improve the quality of our lives, the creation of some technology that does more unpredictable harm is inevitable as well. In the context of materials created by technology that do more harm than good, video games are one of the most appealing which has caused concern in many parents. The appeal of video games is often a result of the fact it stimulates multiple senses and can be played against other children creating a sense of mastery. Yet there are findings in the research suggesting that violent ...

The term euthanasia has Greek roots. It actually means good death, and is commonly used when someone assists other to take his life. Generally speaking there are three kinds of euthanasia. Active euthanasia implies putting someone who suffers from terminal conditions to death. Passive euthanasia does not involve an action but an inaction to prevent death of someone who suffers from terminal conditions. Euthanasia can be voluntary, and non-voluntary. Non-voluntary euthanasia implies that the patient is unconscious or incapable of making any judgment or decision about his own life and death. This paper will find out what utilitarian and ...

Article link: Andrea Yates, drowned 5 childrenhttp://www.crimelibrary.com/notorious_murders/women/andrea_yates/2.htm1. What were the differences in the media portrayal and the information we learned in this unitThe media traditionally like to simplify issues. In the Yates Murder case the central question of Katherine Ramsland is whether or not Yates was Ill or Evil. He article is not an in depth exploration of the dynamics of the case, instead it focuses on if she Andrea was in capacity of her faculties (Ramsland , 2014). If she did not, then she was ill, but if she was, then she was evil. But Psychopathy is a spectrum disease ...

India is the tenth and the third largest economy in the world as ranked in terms of nominal GDP and purchasing power parity respectively. The country is also the 10th largest importer and the 19th largest exporter according to the IMF ranking (CIA, 2014).

Political and Legal Conditions

The government has reduced the excise duty on all products in the category of Value Added food products to a maximum of 8%. It is much encouraging taking into account that previously businesses in the manufacturing category were being charged a VAT of 16% (Lucintel, 2014; Research and Markets, 2014). On legal issues, analysts note that both ...

Jury nullification refers to instances where a jury reaches a determination contrary to the judges instruction on the law. Instead of basing their verdict on the law, jurors look at the facts and deems the law wrong. Consequently, the jury acquits the accused not because they did not violate the law but because the jury considers the flouted law flawed.Whether jury nullification is right or wrong depends on what one perceives to be their duty. While the Sixth Amendments guarantee one the inalienable right to a hearing by jury in criminal cases, the amendment is silent on the functions of jurors. Jurors ...

I belief this is a question that requires a careful analysis. According to Kant, human beings consider themselves different and special from all the other creations. Historically, human beings have inherent dignity that other animals do not have. I believe that such a stand is right. All the other things ought to serve the interest of human beings either by helping them in their work or providing food like the case of animals. Form this premise, therefore, it is true that humans use animals as a means to an end and have no direct duty to protect the animals. Animal rights activist would ...

Critically assess the current legal position of auditors in the UK and Ireland. Analyse the impact the current situation has on the competitiveness of the audit market and discuss some of the methods available to auditors to reduce their exposure to expensive litigation.

Introduction

Auditors are liable for both criminal and civil offenses. Criminal offenses arise when the auditors violate a government-imposed law. It will be a dispute between the State and the auditor. On the other hand, civil offences dispute are always between the individuals and /or organizations. The last two decades have seen the large 4 auditing companies settling the ...

Chapter 17: Agency

[ Course]

Three Agents
Firstly, I would hire beauticians at my Beauty Salon, who would fulfill their duty and work as per the instructions of the clients who come to the Beauty Salon. Secondly I would employ Professional Photographers for my Photography Hub; I would expect them to work on orders such as going to the event venue and capturing the complete event as per the client’s demands. Thirdly I would take on volunteers to volunteer for my vocational training institute, where they would spend their weekends training various vocational skills to homeless/ poor people who cannot earn a ...

Peter Singer is a contemporary ethicist that does not believe that geography should come into play in the modern world when one is executing his or her moral duties. In other words, if your neighbor is in need, Singer things that are just as relevant than if someone half a world away. He argues that because we have the technology to be aware of what is happening throughout the world, we have a duty that extends to other’s across the world. While it is commendable to those who dedicate their lives and resources to remedy difficult situations abroad, Singer misses the ...

The moral duty not to harm others is one the greatest moral standings of all the time. The greater good for triumphs the lesser good and as such, some actions are not permissible for the sake of the greater morals. However, such may not be applicable all the time. How does this situation arise?
If the greeter moral standing of not harming any one is upheld by all the people, there shall be no situation that would require one to protect a child or to self-defense of any sort. Such occurs since no one would harm or at least ...

A citizen is a person who lives in a specific geographical location, and he or she has a corresponding nationality. The work of Russell Dalton divides the identity of the citizen into two distinctive groups. The first one he refers to duty-based citizens, who work in order to fulfill their professional obligations only. However, the second type that he calls engaged citizen works in order to bring betterment in the surrounding society by exerting him or herself all the time. The prime concern for the latterly mentioned group is to develop themselves and others in order to facilitate the process of evolution ...

As the top health administrator for Well Care Hospital in Happy Town, USA, I place a great deal of importance on professional conduct within my particular health care setting. Because of the often life-and-death ramifications of the actions of health care professionals in all aspects of the profession, it is doubly important that these officials operate at the highest standards of ethics and professionalism. Allowing hospital misconduct to flourish under my administration would reflect poorly on myself as well as the rest of the staff, and diminish patient confidence and faith in our ability to do our jobs. Consequently, maintaining ...

The theories of both Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill have played an important role in framing conceptions of modern philosophical theories. Although most modern philosophers have critiqued these theories, they are still important since they form the very basis of philosophical understanding and thought. This essay will summarize, reflect on and respond to the theories of Utilitarianism by John Stuart Mill as well as the Deontological theory by Immanuel Kant.

Utilitarianism

John Stuart Mill’s utilitarian thought is heavily characterized by classical liberalism and positivism and is a ‘consequentialist’ theory. The utilitarian theory is a principle which believes that a right or ...

Nurses are an important need of any hospital as their main duty is to take care of the sick and help the doctors in the mission of regaining health of their patients. In order to hire a good nurse, certain criteria must be established, and definite procedure should be followed to ensure adequate hiring of a nurse. Being an HR specialist, I have made an adequate hiring method which will ensure the hiring of the best nurse in our hospital.
First, to know all the available, interested candidates for the position of nurse; I will upload an application form on ...

Segregation of duties is one of the most important aspects of internal control. For effective implementation of internal control, segregation of duty is essential. It helps enable establish responsibility among the employees as well as keeping a control on their activities. Tom Tuffnut can distribute the given tasks among the three employees in such a manner that no one person can complete the tasks on his own, each task should be so assigned that more than one person is required to successfully finish it. The critical functions of an organization are dispersed among different people. It helps prevent unilateral actions and ...

Business Contract Law: the case of Choc Delux and Kim

1. Law of Tort
The Law of Tort is considered to be an important aspect as far as consideration for legal and statutory implications are concerned (Schwartz, 2003). The Law of Tort is regarded to be a source of legal references in case any of the parties to a business contract is affected by the wrongful actions of the other (Fleming, 2005).
In the case of a situation whereby an individual, group of individuals, are affected by the action of another individual, group of individuals or an organisation, the stipulations of the Law of Tort help in provision of a remedy ...

How does the class system in the Unites States resemble and differ from the caste system in India? Also compare and contrast the caste system with racism.
Social class in the United States is a very arguable case. There are many disagreements that the gradation really exists. Many Americans consider that there is a three-class model of society. It includes a class of rich people, poor and middle class. Most people in America consider that more properly to do the gradation according to wealth, education, occupation of people or their belonging to different subcultures. It's the most simple model of society's ...

Introduction

The word “fiduciary” comes from the Latin word “fiducia”, which means “trust”. The term “fiduciary” is most often used to refer to a person or business that has the power and obligation to act on behalf of another person (called the beneficiary) against the background of total trust, honesty and good faith. Fiduciary duties of directors, officers and controlling shareholders play significant role in business and corporate governance, along with other duties, imposed on them by position. For the purposes of this assignment I would like to discuss fiduciary duties of directors, officers and controlling shareholders. The legislation of Ohio ...

Introduction and thesis statement

Human action and society have been molded upon generations of interaction between past inhabitants of this planet. It is upon this richness and growth that practices are recognized as best practices or as out-rightly wrong. The presence of such guiding principles is useful in leading of the present organized lives that we enjoy. In this progression, philosophy has played a key role in formulating principles or guidelines upon which we can understand our actions, their implications, their motivation and the interdependence between various actions. The formulation of philosophies such as utilitarianism has acted as a base upon which philosophers can examine ...

Jihad is a concept that originated from Prophet Mohammed, who is the founder of Islam. It comes from an Arabic word meaning "struggle" or "effort". It is the heart of contemporary radical Islamist ideology that every Muslim strives for as it means striving in the path of Allah according to the Holy Quran. According to Muslims, Jihad is a religious duty to every Muslim whereby every Muslim has to struggle in Allah’s way. Moat Muslims are always ready to fight the Holy War as long as they are defending their religion and everything that comes from Allah The word Jihad ...

Commitment

Purposes
Scope
All injured employees of ABC Company are eligible for benefit from this program. ABC Company will issue a modified transitional task to an injured employee for a period of 150 days after the injury. During this period, the progress s of the employee will be monitored and at the end a full physician report issued on the state of the worker’s health. If found necessary then more time intervals of 20 days will be given with the recommendation of the physician and signed by the supervisor (Ball, 2002).

Objectives

Duration
An employee under this program will benefit ...

A nurse requires certain qualities, and this growth is during learning. The most significant qualities are empathy, understanding and assessment for each patient irrespective of their age, gender, race or social class. In performing this, a nurse commits to “faithfully practice” her profession and to practice proper ethical values (Domrose, 2001). The nursing code of conduct permits the nurse to perform their duties as needed. The nightingale oath is an adoption of the Hippocratic Oath taken by doctors.
The nightingale oath taken by the nurses ‘I will abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous,’ Nurses are to be part ...

Jim was driving back to home. There was road construction going on. The rocks were blasted by mines for the construction of a road. When Jim was crossing the road at that time a rock due to blast came down and hit his car. Suddenly Jim’s car dropped in the trench. Jim heard a loud voice. Initially, he did not understand what happened to him as he was half unconscious. When he came into proper senses, he found himself in a hospital. Although he did not meet any serious injuries but there some wounds on his forehead and his hands. But the ...

Just war is based on the justification of the way and the reasons for starting wars. The reason may be historical or theoretical depending on the situation. The theoretical reasons are based on ethics and the principles of the war, whereas historical reasons are due to the rules and policies that were historically outlined. Historical reasons limit the warfare based on historical principles. Just war depends on the philosophical goals of the war whereas the ethical limits the duties based on the biblical principles (Steffen, 2012).
One of the ethical principles of a just war is deontology. This is ...

_________ 1
______________
_________________
__________
____________

Global Responsibility and global Justice are linked with moral, ethical and humanitarian considerations. The concept is to ensure equal right and fundamental liberty for all in the world. The theory stresses the need for equitable distribution of wealth and resources to all people of the world. John Rawls (1971, p.3) states in ‘A Theory of Justice’ that, “Justice is the first virtue of social institutions, as truth is of systems of thought.”
The existent apparent gap or chasm, in the world; between ‘have’s and have not’s’ ...

The essay “Resistance to Civil Government” was penned by Henry David Thoreau in 1849, in which he wrote of a new and radical idea that suggested that the moral compass of man should be able to question law, rather than the other way around. He believed that even if people cannot take part in preventing injustice, they should at least not take part in causing injustice. According to him, while it would be moral to even be imprisoned if it helps prevent injustice, but that it was not mandatory for people to do so. Thoreau believed that all that can ...

Philosophy

Dr. Immanuel Reuter Kant (1724-1804), the greatest Enlightenment philosopher, developed what is to be called Kantian Ethics (a deontological philosophy that was named after him). His ethical philosophy contains his Categorical Imperative or the ethical principle that human behavior should be determined by duty or the moral obligation that is innately in them to follow no matter what the consequences are (Johnson). Additionally, Kant regards individuals’ goodwill or innately worthy actions to do good in all circumstances no matter what the repercussions would be because that is precisely what is morally good them and the world at large. He insisted ...

Kantianism and Aristotelian are examples of theories that define the nature of thought or idea. Kantianism dictates that the mind is set to allow immediate interpretation of data presented to it on time against inclinations. Differences between the two philosophies are based on attractiveness, tension and the truth defined by each of them. A philanthropist and training baseball pitcher represent Kantian philosophy. Aristotelian philosophy may be well defined through analysis of natural baseball pitchers.
There exists an exclusive difference between the two forms of philosophies. An outstanding example of an action influenced by the Aristotelian theory is that ...

Immanuel Kant was a great philosopher during his time and has continued to be a prominent thinker in the realm of theology, history, and epistemology. He also one of the latter thinkers of the Enlightment and expanded the traditional thoughts on metaphysics by presenting sound arguments on topics such as law and history, and formulating moral values and philosophy. However, Emanuel Kant excluded religion in his philosophical ideas. Prior to the development of his philosophical theories, the ethical theories that existed were majorly based on the teachings of Greek philosophical thinkers such as Socrates and Aristotle. However, Kant was keen to ...

Singer’s goal in the article is the elimination of famine in the world. His famine relief argument has three premises and a conclusion. His first argument is that suffering and lack of basic needs like food, shelter and medical care are very bad (Singer 1972). He believes these sufferings should be eliminated all together. These premise has two principles, the first states that if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without sacrificing anything significant, we ought to morally do it. The second states that if it is in our power to prevent something ...

According to Selye (1955) stress is defined as a condition which propels a unique body response in a manner that causes changes in physiological or structural aspects of our body. Another view proposed by (Lazarus, 1966) is that stress is a condition which compels an individual to feel exhausted when the demands of that person exceed the physical and social resources accessible to him.

Stress in Aviation

Pilots are really conscious at the time of their flights because accidents can happen with tragic repercussions. These accidents are a cause of series of mistakes committed at the time. Although the executor of mistake may only do one thing ...

Business

The Issue
Since early stages of contract law developments, promises have been recognized as it is essential and important parts. It is worth mentioning that nowadays different visions of interrelations between promises and contracts coexist in terms of different legal traditions. The way promise is perceived within a legal tradition is dependent on the definition of contract it applies to. The issue under study is whether the promise, made by Jason’s father can serve a basis for him getting an obligation to transfer his car to his son.

Regulation (legal tradition, laws and cases)

In the U.S. legal tradition contract means a legally enforceable obligation, which ...

Definition of negligence

Negligence refers to the situation whereby a person fails to behave prudently towards another through actions or omissions that may result to inflicting unreasonable harm to that other person (Cornell University Law School, 2010). The essential elements of negligence include; 1) duty- this is the obligation that a person has with respect to another person, 2) breach- it is the conduct that results in failure to fulfill the duty, 3) cause in fact- this refers to ascertaining whether the actions of the defendant are actually responsible for the damage to the plaintiff, 4) proximate cause- this is the scope to which ...